Auto Alliance comes out in favor of new federal fuel economy proposals

After years of fighting fuel economy and emissions rules at both the federal and state levels, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers is finally coming out in favor of the new regulatory framework that will be announced by President Obama tomorrow. The biggest sticking point in recent years has been the move to block California and other states from effectively setting their own fuel economy standards by regulating greenhouse gas emissions.Tomorrow the president is expected to announce new federal rules that will effectively bring CAFE up to the same standard as California's proposal. Because the new rules will retain the footprint based standards from both the California and 2008 NHTSA proposals, it won't completely eliminate larger vehicles. It will, however, be a tough standard, with cars expected to hit 42 mpg by 2016 and trucks coming up to 26 mpg.
The alliance supports the proposal because it will allow automakers to work toward one set of regulations. The next big hurdle will be getting everyone to agree on a common standard for calculating the mileage of plug-in hybrid and extended range electric vehicles. The fuel consumption of those vehicles is highly dependent on the duty cycle, including how often they're charged and how far they are driven past battery depletion. But that's tomorrow's fight. The AAM press release is after the jump.
[Image: Alex Wong/Getty]
Automakers Support President in
Development of National Program for Autos
Washington, DC – On Tuesday, May 19, automakers will join with President Obama, federal agencies,
governors and environmental leaders to announce a commitment to establish a National Program that
will reduce carbon emissions and increase fuel economy.
"For seven long years, there has been a debate over whether states or the federal government should
regulate autos. President Obama's announcement ends that old debate by starting a federal rulemaking
to set a National Program," said Dave McCurdy, president and CEO, Alliance of Automobile
Manufacturers. "Automakers are committed to working with the President to develop a National
Program administered by the federal government."
"What's significant about the announcement is it launches a new beginning, an era of cooperation.
The President has succeeded in bringing three regulatory bodies, 15 states, a dozen automakers and
many environmental groups to the table," said McCurdy. "We're all agreeing to work together on a
National Program."
A National Program is a priority to automakers because a national fuel economy program allows
manufacturers to average sales nationwide, so customers in all 50 states can continue to buy the types
of vehicles they need for family, business and leisure. A National Program also avoids conflicting
standards from different regulatory agencies, and it gives automakers much needed certainty for long-
term product planning. In addition, a National Program delivers overall greenhouse gas reductions
equal to or better than those that would be realized under separate programs by different regulatory
bodies.
EPA and NHTSA intend to initiate a joint rulemaking that reflects a coordinated and harmonized
approach to implementing the Clean Air Act and the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. The
rulemaking is expected to include several elements important to automakers, including:
• Preserving Vehicle Diversity: Harmonized NHTSA and EPA standards would be attribute-
based, or based on a vehicle's "footprint." This approach allows for a range of sizes of vehicles
to meet consumer needs for passenger and cargo room.
• Providing Certainty for Long-term Planning: Automakers would know what standards will
be through 2016, which is critical in an industry where bringing a product to market typically
takes 5-7 years. The National Program is intended to give automakers sufficient lead-time to
incorporate technology as part of existing vehicle design schedules, so manufacturers would
not have to incur added costs from redesigning all their models at one time.
• Providing Flexibility in Achieving CO2-Reduction Goals: EPA and NHTSA would consider
a range of compliance flexibility measures, such as earned credits, credit trading, air
conditioning credits, and credits for using additional technologies that reduce carbon dioxide
(CO2).
"The debate over who sets CO2 and fuel economy standards for autos has been decided, but there is
still more to talk about. We have the broad outlines of an agreement, but we will need to work closely
with NHTSA, EPA and California in the rulemaking process to resolve multiple issues, trying to fit all
the elements together into one program. There is a strong commitment from everyone to move past
any hurdles that may arise as we work through differences in the way these two federal agencies set
standards," said McCurdy.
"We want to finalize a national program so we can move on to policy discussions on what the future of
sustainable mobility looks like and how we can get there faster," said McCurdy. "Alliance members
are supporting measures that reduce carbon dioxide even more, like low carbon fuels, advancements in
battery technology and consumer incentives to get more advanced technology autos on our roads."
Autos represent 17% of all man-made CO2 in the U.S, according to EPA. Carbon dioxide is created
when any fossil fuel burns, whether it is a car burning gasoline or a backyard grill burning charcoal.
Therefore, to reduce CO2, automobiles will need to burn less fuel. That means automakers will need to
sell fuel-efficient technologies that will produce less CO2.
"All industries will be called upon to reduce carbon emissions," said McCurdy. "Automakers play an
important role. Today, there are more than 50 auto technologies on sale that reduce emissions,
increase mileage and run on clean fuels." Automakers are selling 130 models of automobiles that
achieve 30 mpg or greater on the highway. Consumers can now test drive 35 models of hybrids or
clean diesel in dealer showrooms. More technology is on its way to market.
"We will need to use every engineer we have and every investment dollar available to make our vision
of sustainable mobility a reality. And, we are going to need Americans to buy our clean, fuel-efficient
autos in large numbers in order to meet this climate change commitment," said McCurdy.
The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers is a trade association of 11 car and light truck
manufacturers including BMW Group, Chrysler, Ford Motor Company, General Motors, Jaguar Land
Rover, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi Motors, Porsche, Toyota and Volkswagen. For more
information, visit the Alliance website at www.autoalliance.org.
________________________________________________________________________________
Historical Information
In 1975, the U.S. Congress assigned responsibility for setting automobile mileage standards to the
National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA), which is housed within the U.S.
Department of Transportation.
In 2002, the State of California passed AB 1493, legislation which regulated auto carbon dioxide
(CO2) emissions and fuel economy.
In 2004, the State of California finalized carbon dioxide regulations for automobiles. Automakers
challenged the state action in federal court, saying only the federal government can set mileage
standards to ensure a consistent fuel economy program across the country.
In April 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) should
review possible dangers from CO2 emissions.
In December 2007, automakers supported Congress passing the Energy Independence and Security Act
requiring automakers to increase fuel economy by at least 40% to 35 mpg -- thereby reducing CO2 by
at least 30% -- by 2020.
In 2008, the Bush Administration denied California's request for a waiver from the federal Clean Air
Act to implement its own CO2 program.
In January 2009, President Obama directed EPA to review the waiver decision.
In March, NHTSA raised Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for cars in model year
2011 to 30.2 mpg, and a combined standard for cars and light trucks (minivans, SUVs, pickups) to 27.3
mpg. (The standard is based on what consumers purchase. That is, the standard represents the average
mileage achieved by all vehicles sold by a manufacturer.)
In April, EPA issued a proposed finding that CO2 poses a danger to health and welfare, opening the
door to federal regulation of CO2 from all sources. The U.S. House of Representatives also began
hearings on climate change legislation during April.












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
500 9:05PM (5/18/2009)
Insane. Malaise Era II.
Reply
Sea Urchin 9:53PM (5/18/2009)
Why insane, Auto companies have 24 billion reasons to support this.
Michael 11:32PM (5/18/2009)
Exactly. This is a great compromise with input from auto manufacturers themselves. This is what they wanted - one set of fuel economy standards, as opposed to the patchwork initially proposed by CARB - and it preserves large vehicles through the "footprint" system.
Dave 2:01AM (5/19/2009)
"Why insane, Auto companies have 24 billion reasons to support this."
I doubt its that simple. But its probably the best they were going to get.
Unless things have changed, any CAFE increase benefits Honda and Toyota - they have CAFE credits saved up from when they used to make small, fuel efficient cars.
GM/Chrysler (or whatever becomes of them) will have the only full size trucks and SUVs that can meet the standards unless Ford / Toyota build a full size hybrid system very quickly.
*****Note - Don't forget that CAFE is calculated using pre-08 mpg ratings *****
Patrick 11:35AM (5/19/2009)
How does this 'footprint' system work? It's not explained above. Is it a passenger density, relating vehicle size to carrying capacity? Thanks.
novanglus 12:58PM (5/19/2009)
Ehh, these guys are effin' retards. Let see, lets move from a realistic average of 35 to an unrealistic 42. How many cars sold right now meet 42 mpg avg in US gallons? 3? 4? 5? The Fusion Hybrid doesn't even meet 42mpg combined. So, you can drive a Prius or Insight, whichever PenanceBox the UrbanDruids would have you drive. Of course, anyone with a functioning cerebral cortex knows, the only thing these new regs will do is push even more Americans into trucks. 26mpg average? I think Ford can hit that with a 2.0L EB Explorer.
So, how many people do you think will line up for Explorers and how many do you think will line up for Honda PenanceBoxes?
The silliest thing is how many people don't find it an issue for NanSSi PeloSSi to fly around in her Gulfstream V while they line up for their PenanceBoxes. So, the pigs get the truffles and we get the dirt? Well, some pigs are more equal than others. I wonder what the Presidential Limo gets? 6mpg? LOL.
Man, some people...
Doug A. 9:12PM (5/18/2009)
Just kill the car/truck/vehicle now. We've let the greenies strangle us enough, might as well just give up.
Reply
AMcA 9:57PM (5/18/2009)
Translation: The Obama Administration has a firm grasp on our balls, and they're starting to squeeze. We'll say anything they want us to say.
Beastage 7:55AM (5/19/2009)
Bollocks AMcA, I think it is damn time that the excellent technological resources of the USA will start to work and get direction from the government opposed to direction by profit.
Obama has a clear strategy of solution by technology, it is unacceptable that the US will be behind the modern countries in terms of public transport, internet bandwidth/prices/access, cellular infrastructure, health care and education (that doesn't cost 100k USD a year).
John 8:07AM (5/19/2009)
"USA will start to work and get direction from the government opposed to direction by profit."
Sadly, when people think ideas like this are good for our country, it's further proof our capitalistic roots are withering and dying.
matt 9:14PM (5/18/2009)
whatever, I'm going to buy from companies who'll ignore the CAFE and pay fines for it.
Reply
zamafir 9:43PM (5/18/2009)
Good, judging by their declining market share, Mercedes needs your dollars.
Joe K. 9:15PM (5/18/2009)
No one against it because at the current rate (and with current decisions being made) the total car sales in 2016 will be 4. So most of the manufacturers won't even sell one that year...
Reply
Archane 12:22PM (5/19/2009)
Honestly, even as a car enthusiast, I don't necessarily think that this is a very bad thing. Gas guzzler tax has been around for a while, its fundamental principle is still unchanged. Buy a Hummer? Gov't taxes you big time. Buy a Prius? Gov't gives you a nice tax break.
If you want an enthusiast car you'll have to pay a premium. A lot of people that I know, that are extremely wealthy, could give two f***s what's under their hood. It's all about brand name and luxury. Why do you think the C230 (1.8 SC I-4) was one of the biggest sellers in terms of luxury sports sedans? It was affordable yet classy enough, and pushed out pretty good numbers for an inline four.
Unfortunately due to the average consumer's knowledge, they love the principle of "There's no replacement for displacement." Sure, while having an 8.3 liter V10 in your Viper will give you roughly 500RWHP, it's still complete overkill and just there to show off numbers. We young ones love to see a 75 year old retired geezer driving down the road in a S63 AMG, surely, you KNOW he will be harnessing all the ponies in that bi-turbo V12. (right?)
To sum it all up, a Audi will be an Audi even if it doesn't have a V10 TDI engine in it. My mom could care less weather she owned a L4 or a V6, the difference to her would be a Toyota or a Lexus. So there, mandate luxury brands to include smaller, boosted engines that are more efficient. By creating a system where manufacturers are forced to include smaller engines, people will effectively put out less emissions. Though the system is broken, in the end it will work.
Joe K. 9:56PM (5/18/2009)
Actually since Hummers are over 6600 pounds they don't get hit by the federal gas guzzler tax.
some1 10:24PM (5/18/2009)
@Archane
no one buys a car to be "green"... the only green they have on their mind is how much money they will save at the pump. now that everyone has to pay more, they want to be cheap, but they dont want to say they are cheap, so they play it off as doing something good for the environment. thats about the extent of it. if gas was still a $1, everyone would be driving their SUV's.
The only reason the environment has become important, and the greenies have gotten support, is because people are cheap
i love having the government tell me what is *bad* to buy. i also love to hear it coming from a state that is totally bankrupt...
ill buy my gas sucking jeep, and v8 mustangs, as long as they are built
Jake B 4:05AM (5/19/2009)
Small cars are a waste.
I look for the best deal by the pound!
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHAW!
ij70 9:15PM (5/18/2009)
The return of the steam car. Who woulda thunk?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_car
Reply
Hike15 9:27PM (5/18/2009)
And my hatred for California and the current government continues...i am going to miss those high performance cars which wont be able to make those standards.
first government ruins cars by continuously adding safety and weight, and now they ruin the engines by making the so efficient. o well....by then ill be shopping the used car lot for a nice c6 corvette coupe.
Reply
zamafir 9:44PM (5/18/2009)
Very true, Look how much crappier cars got post '80s, I miss the true performance cars, and times when nothing American made could eclipse 400hp.
Wait. No. Take ur sky is falling doom and gloom elsewhere.