Nissan slaps $56,915* Monroney on 2010 QX56

2008 (2009, and 2010) Infiniti QX56 - Click above for a high-res image gallery
Infiniti has announced pricing on the 2010 QX56 full-size luxury SUV. Essentially a carry-over of the model that was last updated in 2008, the base MSRP for the 2WD model is $56,050 (*plus destination and handling of $865), while the 4WD model arrives at $59,150. Loyalists of the brand will recognize this as a $1,000 bump in pricing when compared to last year's model.
All QX56 models share a 320-horsepower 5.6-liter V8 mated to a five-speed automatic transmission. As has always been the case, the flagship truck arrives heavily laden with technology and creature comforts, leaving just a few items on the options list. These include a Technology Package ($1,150), Mobile Entertainment Package ($1,700), and the Tow Package ($350). A split bench seat package is a no-cost option. Infiniti dealers will also gladly sell you splash guards, wind deflectors, and chrome lashes for everything but the front windshield. Check out the press release after the jump.
Gallery: 2008 Infiniti QX56
[Source: Nissan]
PRESS RELEASE:
Infiniti Announces Pricing on 2010 QX56
Infiniti today announced pricing on the 2010 Infiniti QX56 full-size luxury SUV, which is on sale now at Infiniti retailers nationwide. The QX56 is available in two-wheel and four-wheel drive models, both equipped with a standard 320-horsepower 5.6-liter DOHC V8, 5-speed automatic transmission, leather-appointed seating and a long list of luxury and technology features. The Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) for the 2010 Infiniti QX56 2WD is $56,050 and $59,150 for the Infiniti QX56 4WD.*
About the 2010 QX56
The 2010 Infiniti QX56 continues to offer an outstanding combination of refinement, roominess, advanced technology and power – providing maximum utility and all-season versatility in a stylish, fully equipped full-size luxury SUV. The QX is anchored by an advanced drivetrain, featuring a high-strength steel frame and standard 5.6-liter V8 engine rated at 320 horsepower and 393 lb-ft of torque. Its sophisticated body design is marked by a distinctive chrome "waterfall" style grille, High Intensity Discharge (HID) xenon headlights, Infiniti-style LED taillights, power sliding moonroof and power-operated rear liftgate.
Inside, the exceptionally roomy QX interior features class-leading 2nd row legroom and seating for up to eight with the optional 2nd row split bench seat. Occupants are treated to an array of standard and available technology and luxury equipment, including leather-appointed seating, an Infiniti Hard Drive Navigation System with 7.0-inch LCD screen, XM® Satellite Radio and XM NavTraffic® with real-time traffic information (XM® subscription required, sold separately), 12-speaker Bose® Premium Audio system with Burr-Brown DAC and 9.3GB Music Box Hard Drive and power-folding 60/40 split 3rd row bench seat.
Optional features include a Technology Package with Intelligent Cruise Control and front Sonar System for parking; and an Infiniti Mobile Entertainment System (MES) with DVD player, 8-inch color screen, two wireless headphones and remote controller. A Tow Package (standard on QX56 4WD) is also optional on QX56 2WD.
The QX's 4-wheel independent suspension includes an auto-leveling rear suspension. Maximum towing capacity (when properly equipped) is rated at up to 9,000 pounds. A 5-speed automatic transmission with tow mode, 4-wheel power-assisted disc brakes and 9-spoke 20-inch chrome-finished aluminum-alloy wheels are standard on both 2WD and 4WD models.
About Infiniti
Infiniti offers a full-line of luxury performance automobiles that inspire at every turn, including the G Coupe, Sedan and first-ever Convertible, M sedan, EX and FX crossovers, and the QX full-size SUV. More information about Infiniti and its Total Ownership Experience® can be found at www.InfinitiUSA.com.







Get a WordPress.com Blog




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Assass1n 6:05PM (5/13/2009)
God that thing is fugly, since 2008, Infiniti couldn't find the funds to update that bulbous front end?
Reply
cdwrx 6:18PM (5/13/2009)
That whole thing is a mess, right down to the Quonset-hut-with-a-canopy greenhouse.
Tool 7:38PM (5/13/2009)
It's amazing how these SUVs -- which used to be so popular -- are now like a dinosaur.
Probably a combination of the economy and fuel prices.
Patrick 1:20PM (5/14/2009)
The front end is bad. I can't quite describe why but the headlights make it look retarded.
Aloysius Vampa 6:08PM (5/13/2009)
Darn, I was going to buy one, too. I can't swing that extra $1k, though.
Reply
Other Man 6:18PM (5/13/2009)
All I can say is that I hope they replace this with a 2011 QX based on the new Nissan Patrol, but outfitted for Infiniti duty. An updated 5.6L with direct-injection and other advancements could easily push this thing to nearly or more than 400 hp, and allied with a 7-speed, economy could even stay about the same.
Reply
why not the LS2LS7? 6:20PM (5/13/2009)
I wouldn't set the line production rate too high if I were Infiniti.
Reply
~D. 6:31PM (5/13/2009)
here's how ridiculous that vehicle is: i have NEVER seen one of those on the road. I've seen more BMW X6's, more Chrysler Pacificas, more Lexus LX (whatever the hell the tarted-up Land Cruiser is) on the road and in the flesh than that rebadged bulbous gauche monstrosity. It is so clearly a rebadge of a Nissan model that in-and-of itself is too hideous and boring to sell in any meaningful quantity. The fact that they charge so much for it to boot is laughable, only the French would buy something that looks like that, and even then just to confound the rest of us.
Reply
konatown 7:36PM (5/13/2009)
I see atleast 5 every single day. And the nearest Infiniti dealer is 2.5 hours away.
You probably see them and think Nissan Armada. Not any difference except the badges.
Aloysius Vampa 7:37PM (5/13/2009)
They are around in Tampa, but the Escalade is probably 654 times more popular (rough guess).
n939at 6:34PM (5/13/2009)
I actually saw 3 of these on the road within 5 minutes today. I'd be embarrassed to drive one...
Reply
noodlz 6:37PM (5/13/2009)
I don't think it looks bad, but at the same time I would rather an Armada. I've seen quite a few of those here in Utah.
Reply
Shiftright 6:50PM (5/13/2009)
Makes the Cayenne and X6 look good...yuk...
Reply
anthony 7:19PM (5/13/2009)
I've hated this truck since it was introduced. Infiniti jumped on the luxury body on frame SUV trend too late in the game with an ugly entrant. The bumpy roof-line and strangely shaped rear doors are nasty.
Reply
Slade 7:30PM (5/13/2009)
They are still selling huge disgusting messes like this?
Reply
Adamb 8:03PM (5/13/2009)
Ugly, yes, but just the front, I do own an Armada, I'm the only one in my neighborhood, I cant stand this front end, but I LOVE my Armada.
here in the buckhead area of Atlanta, I see these all the time, my neighbors, own two of these both 2009, one is black the other is a Beige color.
Interior, is identical to my Armada, but the difference is about 15k, so I am totally fine with mine
Reply
Venom 8:46PM (5/13/2009)
If they gave out Oscars for ugly vehicles this would get Best Most Ugly Car on the Planet.
This is the most hideous vehicle ever, ever made.
Reply
adc9787 9:08PM (5/13/2009)
I will never understand everyones hatred of this SUV. It is far from the ugliest thing on the road and just sit inside. Try it.
Reply
Dan 2:42AM (5/14/2009)
The confused roofline seems inspired by a VW bug with a straight camper shell grafted on behind it.
The hood and grille are a bubble about to burst, news of which didn't reach the the squared off front fenders and headlights.
The C pillar door handles that made an old Pathfinder - feet smaller in all dimensions and a full ton lighter - look like a two door ute don't work on a fullsize vehicle.
Sitting inside it is great, it's the one place you can't see how terribly wrong the exterior went.
Hamhock 9:20PM (5/13/2009)
Last I looked TMV for a new one was invoice (per Edmunds) but I have seen Demos as low as $45k
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2009/infiniti/qx56/101082178/optionsresults.html?action=2
Reply