Chrysler brass sends letter asking CAW workers for concessions. Workers burn it.

It boils down to this: In 12 days, Chrysler's fate is likely to be sealed, one way or another. Both the United States and Canadian federal governments have told the automaker that in order to get continued funding, it must restructure dramatically. After consulting with his task force on the auto industry, President Obama made it abundantly clear at the end of March that this meant a Fiat deal needed to be in place within 30 days, otherwise it's basically curtains for Chrysler as we all know it. Without the inter-continental partnership, bankruptcy is a lock. It's just a matter of which number follows the letter C.
Complicating matters further for Auburn Hills is the fact that the Fiat deal is by no means guaranteed, either. This week, Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne said that taking a stake in Chrysler is only a 50-50 proposition right now, and that for a deal to happen, Chrysler's labor costs would need to be cut down to a point where they're in line with the Asian and European transplant automakers, who happen to run non-union shops. With the April 30th deadline hanging over Bob Nardelli and co. like the Sword of Damocles, the Chrysler execs made a plea for concessions from the Canadian Auto Workers via a letter delivered yesterday. These include cost-saving reductions in health and prescription coverage, the elimination of life insurance, and the elimination of other "non-traditional" benefits such as tuition reimbursement, among other things. (A copy of the letter is pasted after the jump.) The letter also includes dire language that essentially states the concessions are required for the company's survival.
The Windsor Star reports that the letter was not well received by some CAW workers at the Windsor, Ontario assembly plant, who responded to it by gathering outside at lunch hour on Friday, whereupon they proceeded to burn the letters during an impromptu rally. And so the stage is set for what are sure to be contentious negotiations between Chrysler and union brass, which are set to begin on Monday. As Bob Nardelli and Tom LaSorda said in their letter to the CAW rank-and-file: "The clock is running."
[Source: The Windsor Star]
Letter from Chrysler to CAW employees:
Dear Employees,
Today, we are at a crossroads in the history of Chrysler. Let's take a look at what's happened in the past few weeks.
On February 17 and February 20, Chrysler submitted its Viability Plan to the U.S. Treasury and U. S. Administration; and to the Canadian governments, respectively.
On March 30, U.S. President Barack Obama stated that Chrysler's Viability Plan was unacceptable. "It's with deep reluctance but also a clear-eyed recognition of the facts that we've determined, after careful review, that Chrysler needs a partner to remain viable."
He went on to state: "I'm committed to doing all I can to see if a deal can be struck in a way that upholds the interests of American taxpayers. And that's why we'll give Chrysler and Fiat 30 days to overcome these hurdles and reach a final agreement -- and we will provide Chrysler with adequate capital to continue operating during that time. If they are able to come to a sound agreement that protects American taxpayers, we will consider lending up to $6 billion to help their plan succeed. But if they and their stakeholders are unable to reach such an agreement, and in the absence of any other viable partnership, we will not be able to justify investing additional tax dollars to keep Chrysler in business."
U.S. President Obama has made it clear that our company must attain competitive labour rates: "Now, what we're asking for is difficult. It will require hard choices by companies. It will require unions and workers who have already made extraordinarily painful concessions to do more ... It will require efforts from a whole host of other stakeholders, including dealers and suppliers."
Also on March 30, the Honourable Tony Clement, Minister of Industry, said, "While the restructuring plans represent progress, they do not go far enough to ensure the long-term viability of these companies. Therefore, we are not certifying their proposals. Together with our U.S. counterparts we believe that further fundamental changes are needed."
Just this week, Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne has made it clear that an alliance is contingent on the UAW and CAW meeting transplant all-in labour rates: "Absolutely, we are prepared to walk. There is no doubt in my mind," Marchionne was quoted as saying. "We cannot commit to this organization unless we see light at the end of the tunnel."
The Canadian government has been very supportive of our viability, providing a loan of $1 billion (CDN, $750 million drawn to date), with an agreement to provide additional support in proportion to the loans received from the U.S. Treasury.
On April 14, the Canadian governments, both federal and provincial, invited the CAW and Chrysler to attend a meeting in Toronto where they laid out four specific guidelines that must be met for providing further financial support. Their "asks" were:
1. That labour costs be reduced to a level equal to those of Toyota Canada. We believe that a Canadian benchmark is the appropriate one for you to achieve. We ask that you jointly demonstrate to us that the agreement you reach attains this benchmark.
2. That Chrysler complete an alliance with Fiat that, in return for equity participation gives Chrysler access to Fiat management, Fiat technology, Fiat sales and distribution outside of NAFTA, and distribution of Fiat products inside NAFTA.
3. That Chrysler and Fiat submit revised plans to Canadian governments and U.S. Treasury based on appropriate assumptions that show clearly Canadian production, product mix, capital investment and R&D.
4. That Chrysler and Fiat commit to maintain Canada's proportion of North American production and to invest over the medium term that same share of total capital investment and R&D expenditure in Canada.
Let's keep in mind, the all-in labour costs at Chrysler Canada are $76 per hour while the Toyota Canada all-in rate is approximately $57 per hour.
While we have made some progress with the CAW, it falls significantly short of closing the $19 gap. And yet, as recent as Wednesday this week, the CAW continues to ignore this clear mandate from the government stating that they will not go any further. This unwillingness to work within the government's guidelines jeopardizes the future of Chrysler and our operations in Canada.
We have made several proposals to the CAW to offset these costs, without affecting base wages and pensions. Some specific examples include:
Prescription drug dispensing fees, by eliminating the cap results in estimated savings of $2.16 per hour.
Elimination of out-of-province health care coverage (snowbirds), with employees and retirees assuming responsibility for any coverage results in a cost savings of $1.00 per hour.
The change from semi-private hospital room coverage to "ward" coverage saves an estimated $0.97 per hour.
Elimination of life insurance for current and future employees results in a cost savings of $1.54 per hour.
The reduction of shift premiums to 2.5 percent results in a cost savings of $.80 per hour.
By increasing health care premiums would save an estimated $1.04 per hour.
The elimination of non-traditional benefits such as child care, legal services, tuition reimbursement, dependant scholarships and extended health care coverage (chiropractic services, massage therapy, naturopath, orthotics, etc.) results in a cost savings of $0.73 per hour.
Unfortunately, the CAW has been opposed to these solutions – however, we are open to alternative ideas. Next week, we plan to meet with the CAW to attempt to reach an agreement that is acceptable to Fiat and the Canadian government.
The clock is running. Without labour concessions, Chrysler Canada's manufacturing operations will not survive long-term. Thousands of good-paying jobs are in jeopardy, as well as the economic health of communities such as Windsor and Brampton.
Canada has always been an important manufacturing and sales market for Chrysler LLC. It represents the largest vehicle sales market for Chrysler outside of the U.S. and no other vehicle manufacturer has a larger portion of its total manufacturing in Canada than Chrysler.
However, these are not normal business circumstances and all Chrysler constituents have been asked to "break pattern" – employees, retirees, dealers, suppliers and others.
Time is very short. We have only two weeks before a final decision must be made. Let me be clear, our negotiations are about saving Chrysler Canada. We are coming down to the wire in the fight for our company's survival – and we need your support.
Bob Nardelli
Tom LaSorda






Get a WordPress.com Blog




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 7)
Rev Junkie 9:59AM (4/18/2009)
Way to go, ya stupid Canucks. "Hey, I can't get a pay cut, my kids need maple syrup, eh!"
Reply
ksmith 10:07AM (4/18/2009)
There's some stereotypical bashing if I've ever seen it. If you read the letter, they're not even asking for a pay cut, just a reduction in benefits.
Steve 10:32AM (4/18/2009)
You're a ---king loser.
kingtaz0 11:02AM (4/18/2009)
What benefits will you have when you are unemployed.. the UAW and CAW are killing their futures. They could easily agree to concessions with a time limit on them and say in 12-24 months they get their benefits back when their company is not about to go under.
The auto unions lately have been making a case for all of the companies that fight unionization.
Coolio 11:11AM (4/18/2009)
I live in Canada and as far as I am concerned, I don't know anybody that says "eh". It is an American sterotype.
Way to insult (a) America's largest trading partner and (b) your largest source of oil (yes, you get more of your oil from Canada than ANY of the Gulf States.
some1 11:14AM (4/18/2009)
you know what makes me love this the most... most of these people are line workers, who (usually) have been doing it forever, and dont have a college education while they make this level of pay... and they cant take a cut? really?
the auto industry is one of the few area left, where you can get a job on a line, make a nice chunk of change, without much more then a GED.
the word selfish comes to mind.
Sam 11:54AM (4/18/2009)
Apparently, if you read further into the Windsor Star's website, ONLY 100 out of the 1400 people present actually participated in the protest. The rest were disgusted by their co-workers' near greed.
http://communities.canada.com/windsorstar/blogs/vanderblogger/archive/2009/04/17/canadian-chrysler-execs-beg-caw-to-save-company.aspx
BigWill 12:08PM (4/18/2009)
"If you read the letter, they're not even asking for a pay cut, just a reduction in benefits."
If you re-read the letter you'll notice that 1) Marchionne is asking for a $19/hour cut and 2) the reductions in the letter add up to $8.24/hr. Where do you think the extra $11/hr is coming from?
I'm far, FAR from a union supporter, but if I were I wouldn't be supporting this either for the simple reason that nobody knows what the terms of the Fiat deal are. Theoretically, the union could capitulate and the plants end up shut down anyways. And if anyone asks Jim Press, his standard response is to drive up in a Fiat 500 and moan "Oooooooh, look how shiny!"
Mr.Oak 12:13PM (4/18/2009)
Coolio: Cool your heels. This is not a USA vs. Canada issue, it is a labor issue. That Canada is our largest TRADING partner is more a matter of geographic convenience than anything else, and it is a symbiotic partnership. BOTH countries benefit immensely from this partnership.
Most folks tend to forget that the US also has substantial oil and natural gas reserves. If put in a dire situation where we had to choose between us and the elk, caribou or seals, the wildlife will loose.
P.S. : If Obama has his way, trade picture in the Americas will be very different. Canada is our #1 trading partner largely because we've been such dicks to the rest of Latin America in the past. Canada also stand to benefit from Obama's overtures to Lat. Am. since many US corporations also have plants in Canada.
Again this is not a USA vs. Canada fight, give it a rest.
MGBYG 12:15PM (4/18/2009)
Here comes the Union bashing from all the secondary school drop-outs...
It is a two-way street. You all AUTOMATICALLY side with the CORPORATIONS like young monkeys want to know where the dominant male is. Read about it.
If Fiat whine and cries and DEMANDS to LOWER THE STANDARD LIVING OF AMERICANS AND CANADIANS so they can MAKE A PROFIT, and the Unions say "Hey wait a minute" all you punks are like "You won't have a job so take a pay cut" Yo, Chrysler shareholders will hold worthless paper if Mopar goes under, but THEY have the right to demand concessions from the Unions???.
THAT'S THE WORST THING EVER! That is TOTALLY counter to the American way. Slippery slope that to "Well, some off-the-boat immigrant will do yer job for $2/h, so we are only going to pay YOU 2 bucks" What are YOU worth? Really, what are YOU worth? Ye who has not sinned....
You have all been trained by rich people and THEIR media outlets to side with rich people and not the working folks of America and Canada...which is YOU!
You are NOT going to be a billionaire so stop worshiping and taking it up the bum from them.
EB 12:25PM (4/18/2009)
Coolio: You really don't know anyone who says 'eh'? I am a Canadian and I say 'eh', and I've been living in the States for about 2 years now.
Tool 3:50PM (4/18/2009)
Chrysler R.I.P.
We all know its coming. It's sad, but true. Get ready for it.
asng15 5:39PM (4/18/2009)
The system needs "change",
not just put the tax payer's money
to the Bottomless Pit
jetrithart 7:06PM (4/18/2009)
Fire everyone of them and put them on the street!!! There are lot's of unemployed workers out there that will work for less than they are.
GOT 8:46PM (4/19/2009)
Eradicate the unions!
RamblinReck89 10:02AM (4/18/2009)
Don't they understand that if Chrysler dissolves that they'll be out of work? And if they're out of work, they won't be able to pay their bills? Eventually their power will get shut off. And everybody knows Canadians are afraid of the dark. Just do what Fiat says dammit!
Reply
Steve 10:33AM (4/18/2009)
LOL you think so far ahead, but you may have a point. I'm sure the workers have just gotten to the point where they're sick and tired of being poked and prodded. No one can really blame them, they're just doing their job, while their bosses ride in the Maybach's and drink wine at the Commissioners parties.
Sea Urchin 10:50AM (4/18/2009)
Well i think that Chrysler better come up with an alternative to Fiat deal, ASAP.
jon 11:09AM (4/18/2009)
I don't see why fiat would take stake in chrysler now, when they could wait for them to file bankruptcy, restructure and then become a better company. once thats in progress fiat could then take stake in them and make a better profit with out having to initially worry about shelling out billions of dollars.
ksmith 10:07AM (4/18/2009)
I'm reluctant to blame the unions for ALL the problems GM and Chrysler are facing, but in this instance, the CAW has made their bed, and now they'll have to lie in it. It just looks like it'll be their death bed this time.
If you read the letter, Chrysler is just asking for parity between the CAW and Toyota of Canada. And they're not even asking for pay cut, just a reduction in benefits! They're not trying to hose them like Delphi's CEO tried to do their workers a couple years ago. If asking for parity is wrong, then my sense of right and wrong in this world is severely off kilter.
Reply