Review: 2009 Toyota Land Cruiser - A SUV good enough for Dr. Evil and his wife

2009 Toyota Land Cruiser - Click above for high-res image gallery
Once upon a time, if you were expecting company and they drove a Toyota Land Cruiser, you'd have Teva prints in your carpet and the smell of patchouli filling your house. Their refrigerator cheese selection probably included one with the word "Whiz" in it, and if things got too warm, your guests would unzip their Vatican pants at the knees and stuff the legs into their oversized shorts pockets. No more. With a starting price of $64,755, the 2009 Toyota Land Cruiser is a certifiable luxury proposition that only gets close to grime when tackling a grass-covered hill at the local little-league soccer field. Yet in spite of its juggernaut proportions and new personality, after a week in the 'Cruiser, it's obvious why Toyota's biggest SUV sells: it's a giant Camry that seats eight and eats volcanoes.
Gallery: 2009 Toyota Land Cruiser
Before we begin we should probably put the eigth generation Land Cruiser in context. With a price matching that of a Cayenne S (once you option the Porsche comparably), U.S.-spec Land Cruisers are usually bought by people who won't treat it like U.N. peacekeepers. In fact, much the same way as its upscale Lexus LX570 cousin, not only do Land Cruisers not get dirty, they often look brand-new years after they've been bought. That encourages some folks to call them out for being one of the chosen chariots of suburban moms, the kind who fill their 5,700-pound, eight-person earth-mover with nothing more than a purse and a bottle of water.

But that's the wrong way to look at it, because the U.S. 'Cruiser isn't about utility anymore. Oh, it remains obscenely spacious and monstrously capable, but utility isn't the bulls-eye it once was. Crazy as it might sound, it's better to think of the Land Cruiser as a Range Rover, or even a Ferrari or Bentley. It's a halo vehicle by Toyota's own admission, cashing in on the decades of unstoppable credibility it earned back when wealthy mothers wouldn't have anything to do with it. It even sells in halo vehicle numbers: there were 3,801 examples sold in 2008. That's roughly three months of Range Rover sales, and about 500 fewer units than Ferrari and Bentley's combined sales. And with that comes halo-car reasoning – anyone spending $65K on an SUV isn't doing so because he or she really needs it...


So what does a Land Cruiser buyer get for all that dosh? Off-road, they get a vehicle that strides through the wilderness as ably Mother Nature herself. The 'Cruiser remains a body-on-frame truck, and the frame has been bolstered with beefier, high-strength-steel longitudinal sections. Between the frame and the road are double wishbones with coil-overs up front, and a four-link coil-spring with a solid axle and Panhard rod out back. Suspension travel is 9.05 inches up front and 9.45 inches in the rear.

The real coup, though, is the Kinetic Dynamic Suspension System (KDSS). Two interconnected hydraulic control cylinders are located in the front and rear of the vehicle. They take their inputs from the vertical positions of the front and rear wheels, and they control the engagement of the stabilizer bar. When the Land Cruiser is on the road and the front and rear wheels are level, the pressure in both cylinders is equal and the stabilizer bar remains engaged in order to cut down on body roll. Off-road, on uneven terrain, when the pressure in the cylinders is unequal, the mechanical movement of the hydraulic pistons effectively unhooks the stabilizer bars, allowing more roll, but giving the wheels a chance to stay in touch with the Earth. As we experienced during the Land Cruiser versus H2 comparo last year, the system works a treat; with 27 inches of vertical rear-wheel articulation, when we had the H2 rocking on two wheels, the Land Cruiser just stuck its leg out a little further and found solid ground. It's basic and extremely effective.


Another basic but extremely effective off-road feature is the CRAWL control. Put the truck in low-range and select one of three speeds, and the 'Cruiser will make its way over the most unseemly obstacles by controlling engine speed and braking. No need to figure out which differential button to press, no worries about your feathering technique with accelerator and brake. The crawl mode even works in reverse at three different speeds. Yet for all its convenience – and we admit to using it a couple of times – if you enjoy off-roading, it really does kill the thrill. Successfully navigate a nasty stretch of impediments and all you can really congratulate yourself on is that you managed to keep breathing and stay alive, because otherwise you did absolutely nothing. Frankly, unless there's a risk of getting beached or going over a cliff, you don't even need to steer. The truck will find its way through. Admittedly, in other countries at least, that's exactly what a Land Cruiser is for: to get you through whatever stands between you and the goal. It does it now just as well, and much more simply, than ever.

On-the-road and coddled inside is where the 'Cruiser makes its case to the moneyed matron. It might as well be an immense Camry that's nicer to be in, albeit one that has a lot more features along with an "it's safer because it's bigger" feeling.
The engine, with 381 hp and 401 lb-ft, is massively overpowered for off-road duty. But we couldn't help thinking that on-road it wasn't going to be enough for a 16-foot-long vehicle with a gross weight rating of 7,275 pounds. We were wrong. The six-speed adaptive transmission is quick to downshift, after which the truck simply picks up and goes. It's a bit like sitting on the back of an elephant and wondering, "How fast could this behemoth possibly go?" Then when it takes off, running faster than you ever could, you think "Oh. Well. That's not bad."


The controls are cotton candy light. Toyota seems to have geared them on the chance that you had only one finger and one toe available to drive the vehicle. You could probably turn the steering wheel by blowing on it, but there is enough slack between it and the wheels turning that you wouldn't hurt yourself doing it. The accelerator, like the crawl mode, appears to have three settings: nothing; okay, we're moving; and go, go, go, go, go! There isn't much in the way of feel while driving, but again, Land Cruiser buyers aren't in the hunt for feeling. When they want to change lanes, they really only care about turning that round thing in front of them and then turning it slightly the other way when the task is accomplished. The 'Cruiser passes that test, and the KDSS keeps things admirably level while doing it.

The Land Cruiser is also pleasantly quiet. The A-pillar has been filled with foam to reduce wind noise. The bushings between the body and the frame have been redesigned to keep road noise and vibration in check. A molding between the windshield and hood keeps air flowing over the vehicle and away from the windshield wipers. When stationary, it is genuinely hard to tell if the engine is running without checking the tachometer. Even when moving, it will only make its presence known when you punch the gas. From the driver's seat, the only thing you'll is the 14-speaker, 605-watt JBL sound system and, perhaps, a bleating child roaming somewhere among the prairie-sized cabin.


Full Disclosure: Toyota's own Sequoia is actually bigger than the Land Cruiser, but the latter is still expansive enough that it should have its own Department of the Interior. Three rows of leather-wrapped seating fit inside, and there remains room for some soft-sided bags even with the third row in use. The first two rows are warm and welcoming; the third – while much better than some ill-thought-out offerings from other makers – is still no place to put your adult friends if you can help it. If they do get sent back there, however, they'll at least have an easier time making the trek because the second row slides forward four inches, and the passenger side has a one-touch tumble mechanism so you can get it out of the way quickly. And when you decide to stack luggage back there instead of your friends (as it should be), the seats fold up and flip away courtesy of another one-touch button.

Up front, the center console has a reduced button count because of the touchscreen, but don't let that fool you – it's mission control and you're the NASA engineer. The screen has excellent resolution and all-condition visibility – the rearview camera is like watching television -- and provides controls for the aforementioned sound system as well as the telephone, calendar, navigation, maintenance, HVAC, and entertainment system. Beneath that are push-button controls for the four-zone climate system, the effects of which will be issued from the 28 vents spread like buckshot throughout the cabin.


Nor will the Land Cruiser be left out when it comes to whipped cream conveniences and safety. It's got keyless go, a moonroof, HomeLink and heated, power front seats, and you can get a heated second row, back-seat entertainment, parking sensors, headlamp washers, and a towing convertor to power trailer lights among numerous other options. Then there are the 11 airbags, active headrests, three-point seatbelts for all eight positions, traction control, stability control, brake assist and electronic brake force distribution.

So, is it worth the $65,000 cover price plus options? With a vehicle like the Land Cruiser - specifically, this American-spec model - that isn't really the issue. But if the Porsche Cayenne is too flashy, the Mercedes GL too dainty, and the Lexus LX570 too... Lexus, then the Land Cruiser is probably hulking over your sweet spot. It's ability to haul anything anywhere and let you forget you're doing it is a fine feat, and there are other vehicles that charge more to do less. The question is: Do you want to buy a Kilimanjaro on wheels that comes with a built-in lair that seats eight? If so, the mountain has come to you. All you'll need now are henchmen...








Get a WordPress.com Blog




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
jinsei888 12:03PM (4/16/2009)
epicly unnecessary...
Large SUV for teh FAIL!
Reply
The Luigiian 12:25PM (4/16/2009)
At least this one has some real off-road chops...
"The real coup, though, is the Kinetic Dynamic Suspension System (KDSS). Two interconnected hydraulic control cylinders are located in the front and rear of the vehicle. They take their inputs from the vertical positions of the front and rear wheels, and they control the engagement of the stabilizer bar. When the Land Cruiser is on the road and the front and rear wheels are level, the pressure in both cylinders is equal and the stabilizer bar remains engaged in order to cut down on body roll. Off-road, on uneven terrain, when the pressure in the cylinders is unequal, the mechanical movement of the hydraulic pistons effectively unhooks the stabilizer bars, allowing more roll, but giving the wheels a chance to stay in touch with the Earth. As we experienced during the Land Cruiser versus H2 comparo last year, the system works a treat; with 27 inches of vertical rear-wheel articulation, when we had the H2 rocking on two wheels, the Land Cruiser just stuck its leg out a little further and found solid ground. It's basic and extremely effective."
This is pretty awesome. If anybody wants to build a truly capable off-road SUV and still have it nice on-road, this would definitely be the way to do it.
why not the LS2LS7? 12:30PM (4/16/2009)
The Luigiian:
It is a good way to make an off-road capable vehicle work better on road, this is why Range Rovers have had a similar system for several years.
But it's still pointless. You only need this feature if you actually go bouldering, these vehicles never see anything but soft-roading.
The Luigiian 12:34PM (4/16/2009)
@LS2:
I know. When I say "If anybody wants to build a truly capable off-road SUV and still have it nice on-road" I mean "Toyota FJ Cruiser"
I don't know how expensive that would be, or whether it would raise the price a tremendous amount, but I would think it would be a pretty cool addition nonetheless.
JDMlover 12:40PM (4/16/2009)
Its not unnecessary because it is built for people who live where the pavement ends or people who live out back. its does not hide or pretend to be something else. Its a big SUV for serious terrain...unlike the shiny Escalade and babied Land Rovers.
This SUV is way better then any Land Rover or other SUV that can go off road.
IMO the best Luxury SUV on the market is the Lexus LX570. It still has all the Land Cruiser off road capabilities but with Lexus Luxury and build.
Paul P. 1:15PM (4/16/2009)
Maybe we would see more of these things off-road if they were less expensive. Who want to buy something for $60,000+ and then go beat it up. Or, worse yet, lease it and have to give it back damage free.
If they offered stripped-out low cost models I'm sure we would see more of them doing what they're supposed to.
With that said, if I was planning on getting one of these to off-road with, I would wait a few years until I could pick one up used for a small fraction of the original price. Then I would have no problem beating up a, formally, $60,000 SUV.
Jared 1:56PM (4/16/2009)
If you go over to ih8mud.com forums, you'll see a lot of folks who actually do take their 200-series Land Cruisers off road.
I take my 4Runner off road. If I could afford a Land Cruiser, I'd buy one in a minute. Great truck.
Randy915 7:18PM (4/16/2009)
@ Paul, a Saudi prince.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fhpm3qnTu9s
Frylock350 9:02AM (4/17/2009)
@JDMLover,
H2 is more competent offroad. And the Lexus version is a rebadge, it wears virtually identical sheetmetal. However the idea of using a full-size SUV offroad is insane. A cheap basic FJ cruiser or even better a Wrangler Rubicon will leave the Land Cruiser or H2 for dead.
lu1de 10:04AM (4/17/2009)
WHAT DOES "TOO LEXUS" MEAN??
Matt 2:28AM (4/21/2009)
Hey JDMlover, that stock in Consumer Reports doing well these days?
People being so absolutely blatantly biased makes me want to punch a baby in the face. Their baby.
MajorGeek 12:07PM (4/16/2009)
Wow, that is so ugly. I would look at an Escalade for that price. I just don't think the exterior has a luxury look.
Reply
tekd 3:29AM (4/17/2009)
But that's the point-it's not supposed to look luxurious. Anybody who wanted this with a luxury look and brand would have gone and bought the Lexus version anyway.
This is basically the exact opposite of an Escalade-it's literally the least bling $70,000 SUV you can possibly buy. It's for people who don't want to rub their wealth in people's faces with a luxury badge, but enjoy knowing that their SUV is every bit as advanced as any of those blinged out SUVs, and more capable under the hood than them.
And the people who pay this kind of money for it are also paying for the history tied to the Land Cruiser name-this is a strictly niche product that sells on it's history and capability, so if you want hot looks or 22 inch rims or whatever it won't ever have it.
But seriously, it's kind of great in how incognito it is-you can drive it around everywhere and the vast majority of people won't even realize you're driving a $70,000 SUV because most people have no clue how much a Land Cruiser costs, and it's looks are so anti-bling nobody would turn to look. Drive around in an Escalade or Cayenne (well, in a normal neighborhood anyway) and people will notice, and not everyone wants that.
Frylock350 10:25AM (4/17/2009)
Uhhh. the Escalade has more capability under its hood than the Land Cruiser.
MajorGeek 2:04PM (4/17/2009)
Regardless.
Its a Toyota.
Its ugly.
Make all the excuses you like :)
longbeachguy516 12:08PM (4/16/2009)
60K for this garbage? Give me a break.
Reply
VP 12:10PM (4/16/2009)
After reading the first paragraph i have to stop there and respond, you sufficiently justified the Land Cruiser as a "halo" vehicle. Why is it that when you guys are reviewing let's say a Suburban those same words don't come out your mouths? That vehicle from GM has the same level of "history". Yet the SUV's that the Americans make are symbols of not understanding the consumer.
Reply
downhill.specialist 12:41PM (4/16/2009)
um, because a GM will NEVER have the interior of any other quality of a Euro or Japanese manufacturer when it comes to luxury. Even the Cadillac, while nice, still smack of GM's pretty awful interior design.
PJ 1:08PM (4/16/2009)
The Suburban is as old as the Land Cruiser, but in terms of "history," safari guides, relief workers, U.N. officials, researchers, prospectors, etc. have all relied on the Land Cruiser since the '50s. If you go off-roading in Africa, India, Mongolia, Nepal, and so on, you're probably doing it in a Land Cruiser.
The Suburban does a fine job carting horse trailers and elected officials around North America, but it's not a global icon.
Luis 2:01PM (4/16/2009)
GM's halo vehicle is NOT the Suburban, it's the Corvette.