Future Classic: Jeep XJ Cherokee
_580.jpg)
Jeep XJ Cherokee - Click above for high-res image gallery
It's easy to deride American Motors Corporation as mediocre to the point of failure. Legions of fans will argue vehemently that the last independent was a nimble innovator that consistently outflanked the competition with creative, clever products. In fact, the final vestiges of the company have just been worn away by the sands of the current decade, even though Chrysler hungrily swallowed up AMC for its Jeep property in 1987.
Jeep's value is undeniable. Just as it was the crown jewel in AMC's portfolio, it's likely the most valuable asset Chrysler has right now, too. There's been further depth to the Jeep line virtually since the beginning, with offerings like the Willys Jeep Wagon, Jeepster, Cherokee/Wagoneer, and J-series pickups expanding options for buyers. While those vehicles all trended toward larger, more deluxe offerings, one Jeep vehicle helped start a movement that's still with us.
Gallery: Jeep Cherokee Future Classic
The Jeep Cherokee, designated the XJ, was a deft move in the early 1980s, and was a major factor in making SUVs the modern family car over the last 15 years. In the late 1970s, plans got underway at AMC for a new Jeep vehicle, one that shared only the Cherokee name with its older SJ sibling. The chiseled styling was so handsome and well-balanced that Jeep's current Patriot and Liberty are still aping it in an attempt to close sales. Two- and four-door models made up the initial offering, joined shortly thereafter by the shorter-lived Comanche pickup.

Fitting in the lineup between the CJs and the much larger Wagoneers, both classics in their own right, the Cherokee was just the right size in 1984. The Cherokee's arrival on the market coincided with Ford's introduction of the Bronco II, and Toyota's rolling out of its 4Runner. Just a year prior, General Motors launched its S10/S15 Blazer/Jimmy twins, and Nissan would chime in with its Pathfinder in 1986. Competition in the segment was less fierce, and there were fewer choices, but the Cherokee was considered by many to be the standard bearer.


Consumers flocked toward these newly debuted SUVs as a replacement for the family wagon. Manageable size made the Cherokee as easy to maneuver as a car, and it did so while packing serious off-road prowess. Most of the engineering for the Cherokee's running gear had been worked out in earlier AMC vehicles like the Concord and Spirit; sedans and wagons which carrying transfer cases up their sleeves. In the swaths of the country that experience winter weather, the Cherokee was a safe haven from tail-wagging family trucksters, able to surefootedly press on in nasty conditions. Heading off road, as very few original XJ buyers did, was another revelation. The Cherokee is a billy goat.
Engines were the largest stumbling block for the early Cherokees. AMC's own 2.5-liter four-cylinder was present, and an optional GM-sourced 2.8-liter V6 was also available for a bit more oomph. Neither motor set the Cherokee back on its heels with accelerative force, and it wasn't until the arrival of the revered 4.0-liter inline-six in 1987 that there was finally adequate grunt from the engine room. Interestingly, a Renault turbodiesel was also offered early on, between 1985 and 1987. Today, they are as rare as hen's teeth and a perfect candidate for a greasecar conversion.

AMC became newly chic with the Cherokee as troublesome European wagons were traded in for this broad-shouldered progeny of Toledo. The ride and handling had an edge of Jeepyness, feeling stiff-kneed, and exhibiting some mild head toss, but buyers found the tradeoffs acceptable and Jeep was smart enough to dress up the XJ in a few ways to entice customers, too. The Wagoneer name migrated down to the XJ, and those were trimmed more luxuriously. Wagoneer and Wagoneer Limiteds have four headlamps, and there's also the classical woodgrain applique on the flanks of the Limited models. The interior design is a product of its time, though it is clean and straightforward. Legroom wasn't gigantic in any seating position, but overall, the Cherokee accommodated four people happily, five with a little grumbling.
Detail changes abound throughout the Cherokee's nearly twenty year run from 1984-2001. 1997 brought revised styling with a softened nose and retrimmed rear hatch and taillights. Older examples are more likely to have some rust, and the age of the bodyshell's design may make the structure more susceptible to rot than more modern efforts. The XJ's winter prowess probably makes it more challenging to find one that hasn't tasted road salt, but there are still good Cherokees to be found.
_280.jpg)
_280.jpg)
The running gear, whether it's the four-cylinder, the inline-six, or even GM's V6, will not be hard to find parts and pieces for, although some powertrain combinations are more desirable than others. Watch out for the 2.8-liter mill and Peugeot gearboxes. The unit body with integrated ladder frame reinforcement was also further stiffened for the '97 update, but all Cherokees go down the road with a solid confidence, especially when there's a torquey 4.0 underhood. There were two variants of four-wheel drive systems - Command-Trac and Selec-Trac, and all versions used Quadra-Link front suspension. The chassis is a little trucky, but it's quite well behaved for the class, especially considering its capabilities.
Other markets have known the joy of the Cherokee. European XJs were available with a VM Motori diesel, and a commercial version was also made with metal in place of the rear side windows, like a sedan-delivery. China, too, has had the Cherokee move in. AMC had blazed the trail with automotive partnerships in China, and Beijing Jeep kept the XJ alive as the Jeep 2500 until 2006, 19 years after AMC disappeared from the face of the planet – impressive legs for a company that always had to do more with less while competing on the big stage with better funded Detroit competition.
_580.jpg)












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
anthony 8:13PM (4/14/2009)
My parents have a 1994 Cherokee Sport 4 door with the 4.0L, a five speed manual, and the off road package. It has about 200,000 miles on it, the engine runs well, but the rest of the car is falling apart around it. It was a reliable workhorse for all the years we had it, and never gave us any significant trouble.
I still like the simple, no nonsense lines of the exterior.
Reply
Wunderbird 8:58PM (4/14/2009)
I can vouch for that Tony.
I had a 92 Cherokee with the 4.0, 4spd auto and selec-trac 4wd system. The engine, trans, and xfr never gave me a lick of trouble, but the rest of the truck was falling apart.
Got rid of it a few years back with 200K for something bigger (and less fun). My understanding is that it is still being used as a daily driver.
Jared 11:14PM (4/14/2009)
I still think dollar for dollar reliability and utility... the 3rd generation 4runners where better. Although the v6 is the 4runner isn't as legendary as the inline6 in jeeps, the quality of built and materials, along with the cost of ownership puts them above jeep SUV in my book.
although... nothing made by any other manufacturer can compare to the Wrangler.
car doctor 8:17PM (4/14/2009)
As the proud owner of a 2001 Cherokee Limited - I appreciate this great vehicle everyday! The styling and functionality have a clarity of purpose that vehicles today mostly lack. Yes, the interior is tight, the steering lacks feel, and the ride is rough but it's light weight, has good power, timeless styling, and great off-road performance. The fuel economy is the same as our 2008 Escape V6 4x4! Most of the XJs I see are pretty beat up or tricked out but they made so many of them that it's still pretty easy to find a clean one.
Reply
LeMuRfArT 8:16PM (4/14/2009)
i LOVE this car. im actually in the process of trying to find another.
this was my first car, a white 89 with maroon interior.
these cars are cheap and cheap to fix and run forever, the perfect transportation
Reply
Assass1n 7:35AM (4/15/2009)
No doubt- my sister has a 93 four-door. Its been upside down in a ditch, in a couple fender benders, and basically thrashed since she got it. But she can't kill it- it just keeps going. Oh and the 4.0L HO is, IMHO, still a better motor than anything chryco offers now.
taylorv 8:26PM (4/14/2009)
I'm on my 3rd Jeep Cherokee. It won't be my last.
Love the inline 6 engine and the XJ body style.
Reply
Nude Love 8:26PM (4/14/2009)
I have a 95' Jeep Cherokee Country as my DD.
I put a new water pump, a new radiator, I changed the power steering pump, I had to rivet down sheet metal where the floor rusted through, the engine mount broke, I don't know what the hell happened with the wiring, I replaced 2 power window motors, the rear speakers don't work, the radio was giving me trouble, and the exhaust is about to go, and right now, I am at 77k miles. I can't believe what a terrible train wreck that was and is. Some douchebag keyed it, but even besides that, the paint looks terrible, and I have these crappy looking steelies on it. You can see where I had to cut through the dash to get to some wires, and when you get in it in the morning, it is musty as hell, and I don't know why.
But I won't get rid of it until it dies, and that is a long way off. I love it too damn much.
Reply
tuna 8:26PM (4/14/2009)
I had a 97 loaner for a week while my 96 grand cherokee laredo (with the same motor) was at the dealer for a mysterious water leak (one that would soak and fill the driver's footwell when parked on an incline during rain). I was surprised by how terrible the fuel economy was since I was always filling it during that week. It really wasn't any better than my ZJ, which was never fixed by the dealer to the day I traded it for a GTi a year later.
Reply
Stuka 8:27PM (4/14/2009)
The XJ was a great vehicle. The first models with the GM 2.8L V6 were horrible. Terrible power. But when AMC placed the 4.0L i6 into them (A smaller EFI version of the 258), it became a truly great SUV. A solid chassis, they cost much much less than what the other auto makers had, and lasted for a long time (you still see plenty of 80's models on the road).
Another vehicle that put AMC ahead of its competition was the Grand Cherokee (ZJ), which was to be a replacement of the Grand Wagoneer. It was originally designed in 1984. But was pushed off due to funding. When Chrysler bought Jeep, they took the designs for the Grand Cherokee and put them into production. And used that design all the way up until the WJ came out.
And the 4.0 i6, they used that all the way until 2006.
Reply
Nude Love 9:19PM (4/14/2009)
*Pouts*
*Sniffle* My S10 has the GM 2.8L... *Sniffle*
Thanks a lot...Jerk...
*Goes into a corner and cries*
CSmit 7:48AM (4/15/2009)
@ NudeLove,
I'm sorry, I had an '84 Cherokee with the 2.8 and it sucked...really...really...bad. It was borderline dangerous on the Interstate in Virginia due to the hills...nothing says "Hmm...I wonder if I can shoehorn in a 4.0" like a Peterbilt badge rapidly closing in from behind while going up a hill.
Stuka 9:28AM (4/15/2009)
@Nude: Sorry dude, but 115hp in an SUV just doesn't cut it. There were versions of the engine with 150hp, but neither Cherokee's or S10's got them :/
MM 8:30PM (4/14/2009)
These things are the cat's a$$. The 4.0L inline 6 goes forever. Why did Chrysler stop building this... oh, I know because our lame country requires safe cars like the Smart for Two and ecologically friendly vehicles like Hybrids that have so much mercury in them that they will destroy our water supply.... Sweet!
Reply
JZeke 8:46PM (4/14/2009)
Thats a rough statement, and false.
Focus groups, Chrysler's inept management, and insatiable consumers with tons of credit killed this great machine.
Chrysler could've elected to evolve this vehicle, instead of coming up with the goofy Liberty after all. Last I checked tho the CJ series is still going strong, so I'm not sure what yer talkin about with Smarts and hybrids.
MM 9:12PM (4/14/2009)
@jZeke
You know they don't use the inline 6 4.0L anymore. The new engine is the V6 3.8L because it is supposed to be more eco friendly, even though its a POS
geoff 2:19PM (4/15/2009)
Hey JZeke,
You say the last time you checked, the CJ series was still going strong???
The last of the CJ's (the CJ-7 and CJ-8) ended production in 1986....
You better do some more checking one of these days!
amg 8:39PM (4/14/2009)
I really don't understand the fascination...
The interior is a bit cramped (especially the back seat), it handles poorly, brakes suck, MPG sucks, mine fell apart and cost a fortune to fix. The Liberty is a much better vehicle.
Reply
inline6 8:55PM (4/14/2009)
AMG,
Consider that the BMW 1-Series coupe is 3" longer overall than the XJ Cherokee. Now say that the XJ's interior is cramped.
And fuel economy was competitive with the competition. Sorry yours fell apart, but that doesn't mean that the XJ wasn't an excellent vehicle.
mikecanada 10:07PM (4/14/2009)
You're comparing a vehicle that was relased in 1983 to a model released 20 years later. The Cherokee was a true innovation, the Liberty is an also-ran that mimicks every other SUV.