Review: 2009 Honda Fit Sport is still frugal, slightly less fun

2009 Honda Fit Sport - Click above for high-res gallery
Evolution's a funny thing. We like our thumbs, enjoy walking upright and are thankful Ivanka Trump doesn't have a tail (although there's some debate about where she hides her horns), but when adaptation turns to automobiles, Darwin's dictum occasionally goes astray. There's a long list of vehicles we would love to see stay the same, but we understand that consumer demand and government regulation forces automakers to add amenities and tack on the pounds. The 2009 Honda Fit Sport is a perfect case-study.
Compared to the original Fit that landed on our shores in 2006, Honda's sophomore effort is larger, more spacious and marginally more powerful. But when you sit down with the spec sheet there are only a few "improvements" worth getting excited about. After spending a week with the 2009 model, we found that while evolution is good, some things need to stay the same. Make the jump to find out why.
Gallery: Review: 2009 Honda Fit Sport
Photos copyright ©2009 Damon Lavrinc / Weblogs, Inc.
It's tough to say which Fit is more attractive. We liked the simple honesty of the outgoing version, but as fans of the Euro Civic, the 2009 model's frontward aggression is a welcome addition. The fascia is more angular and less anonymous, and matched with the sculpted swage lines, over-styled hatch and dainty spoiler, the Fit Sport has ditched most of its mini-minivan character in favor of a dynamic shape that lends some familial cohesion to the lil' runabout. Praise be to Honda for erring on the Euro side of its recent stylistic endeavors, as we can't imagine the rhinoplastic horrors that would have afflicted the Fit if a Pilot/Ridgeline facelift found its way up front.


On the inside, the revisions are just as apparent and equally divisive. The leather-wrapped steering wheel on the Sport model is suitably chunky and the perfect diameter to live up to its trim's namesake. But for those who prefer a low wheel placement to compliment the Sport's high-riding seats, be prepared for the top of the center-mounted speedo to disappear from view.

The two-tiered stereo and climate control cluster has been dropped in favor of a singular slab of clickity-clicktastic plastic to house the audio system, and the fan, temperature and directional knobs apparently suffered a bout of elephantitus when they migrated to the left side of the stereo. While their placement might be more "driver oriented," pleas from the passenger seat to turn up the heat will be forthcoming. Thankfully, Honda got it right with the five-speed manual's shifter placement, which falls subconsciously to hand and delivers the smooth and solid action that comes with anything carrying an "H".


The front seats are what you'd expect in anything under $20-large, offering enough adjustability and padding to remain comfortable on the daily commute, but lacking the serious bolstering you'd require while tackling the bends. The rear "Magic Seats" still fold up to reveal a clean pass-through and a flat floor (we managed to fit a plasma TV with ease), and with the rear 60/40 bench backs folded down, there's 57 cu-ft of storage (15 cu-ft more than the 2008 model) for moving a dorm-full of detritus when headed home for the holidays.



The 1.5-liter inline four-cylinder engine remains, with a single overhead cam manipulating 16 valves, but output is up to 117 hp at 6,600 rpm (eight over the 2008 model) and 106 lb-ft of torque at 4,800 rpm (one lb-ft more than before). Equipped with the five-speed cog-swapper, our tester was rated at 27 mpg in the city and 33 on the highway (one mpg down from the outgoing Fit), and while the fuel tank has shrunk by 0.2 gallons, the Fit's curb weight is up by 51 pounds (2,520 pounds) – a reasonable trade-off considering the additional 4.2-inches of length.


Our First Drive revealed that Honda took considerable care to give the 2009 Fit a more relaxing ride, and apart from the engine note, which drones through the cabin while motoring along at expressway speeds, the steering and power delivery remain true to the original. Bobbing and weaving through town, the uptake and clutch engagement takes some finesse to elicit smooth shifts and the upgraded rolling stock on the Sport (185/55 all-season tires wrapped around 16-inch wheels) provide a communicative – although slightly muted– sense of what's happening underneath.


When we ventured out into the backroads where few econoboxes fear to tread, the 2009 model put up a fight, but ultimately failed to provide the buzzy thrills of its predecessor. Although output is up, the Fit doesn't dart through the corners or deliver the chuckability we've come to expect. The additional weight may be negligible, but there's an odd sense of heft at the helm, and while the front MacPherson struts do their best to keep the tires planted, the Sport-specific rear anti-roll bar can only do so much to keep the solid-beam rear-end dancing like the Patrick Swayze of our youth.

While we're keenly aware that its smoother ride and softer suspension will please the public at large – particularly those who opt for the automatic – we missed the tactility and balance the first-generation Fit delivered. But despite the 2009 model's limited (driver) engagement, the Fit is still the most entertaining runabout in its class, easily putting the Toyota Yaris, Nissan Versa and Chevrolet Aveo to shame. Factor in the $18,000 sticker our tester carried, and the only question left is whether or not the slightly devolved 2009 Honda Fit Sport is a natural selection for you.
Gallery: Review: 2009 Honda Fit Sport
Photos copyright ©2009 Damon Lavrinc / Weblogs, Inc.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
why not the LS2LS7? 12:07PM (3/09/2009)
I have not driven the Fit, but I lament that it grew so much, or even at all. I'm not sure why car companies cannot see the value of keeping a given car in its size class.
In 2020, the Fit will be a full-size like the Accord is now.
Reply
Aprime 12:12PM (3/09/2009)
What?
Have you seen the old one next to the new one? I can hardly differenciate them from the side when I'm close... And if it really grew, it's a question of milimeters, IMO. It just isn't that grown up, if anything it *looks* fattier (which a lot more to do with its new design), but no, it just hasn't grown noticeably enough to complain.
...And it gets better mileage on the Canadian cycle now, same goes with the new Mazda 3.
Aprime 12:19PM (3/09/2009)
Oh wow, it grew 4.2 inches longer (seemingly splitted on both sides).
I'd complain more about the weight gain personally especially considering they slightly shrunk the size of the fuel tank, but at least the engine compensates for that.
If they keep doing it overtime there's a reason to complain, but the additional fraction of a weenor it has in lenght really doesn't matter (it's probably for safety reasons if anything since this is a world car and all, same wheelbase as the previous model I think after all).
Sea Urchin 12:20PM (3/09/2009)
Aprime, Fit grew 6 inches in length so that is a lot.
Why not, the only car that i heard to become smaller from old model to an all new one is Nissan Z350, it lost 3 inches.
MikeW 1:03PM (3/09/2009)
No, 4.2.
The US already had a special long Fit.
Sean 2:02PM (3/09/2009)
You might be calling this guy crazy, but take a look at this:
1973 Honda Civic:
http://www.hondaclassiccars.co.uk/images/Dcp_0985.jpg
139.8inches long
2009 Honda Civic:
http://www.egmcartech.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/2009_honda_civic_image001.jpg
177.3inches long
Aprime 1:31PM (3/09/2009)
I don't think you're crazy, you can see it simply by comparing 90s cars to cars of this decade. My subcompact is bigger in EVERY dimension than the Ford Escort I had, yet interior passenger space barely differs (and favors the Escort, IMO).
But honestly the gain isn't that considerable, cabin space hasn't improved to my knowledge (I haven't looked at the data, FYI, just from seeing the two USM Fits), it hasn't gained in either height or width.
Kumar 1:57PM (3/09/2009)
I figured there were two major ways to keep people buying cars from your company. Get them to buy another larger model that would suit them when their needs grow, or grow the current model if the buyers are more attached to the model name than the manufacturer.
I though the Fit was just a little too small for us fat..err..big boned Americans? ;)
I don't think the seat was fixed though. Not being adjustable enough was/is the car's achilles heal.
Sean 5:48PM (3/10/2009)
@aprime
I wanted to an interior volume comparison (cubic feet or whatnot), but I couldn't find any info on anything but the current generations.
Xcountryflyer 2:19PM (3/09/2009)
Completely agree that it is a trend that afflicts nearly all vehicles nowadays. The Honda Accord being the most egregious of the company's cars. That thing is a boat nowadays with a driving feel that is getting closer to Buick than it was in its early days.
I hope the Fit doesn't morph bigger and bigger until they need to bring in some new car to be "small." It is also too bad it seems to have lost the spunkiness of the first generation in order to be more generic.
naggs 3:03PM (3/09/2009)
over 5 inches is not nothing dude
ive driven both, like my 08 better
Aprime 3:14PM (3/09/2009)
Ugh - it's under 5 inches and it had nothing to do with the wheelbase, it's just plastic.
manuelmondragon 11:27AM (3/11/2009)
Totally agree. I hate the same. Remember what size was the original vw rabitt in the far 1977? Marketing sucks, and we are not the best consumers.
Mazda FTW! 12:09PM (3/09/2009)
Love the interior. I actually like it more than the Civic's. But it's kinda pricey tho.
Reply
Seminole 3:13PM (3/09/2009)
I was helping my girlfriend car shop and was quoted $16,555 for a Fit Sport with Automatic (MSRP of $17,1780) which was well under invoice. In the end she went for a Civic LX instead, but the fit was a great little car.
chconline 12:10PM (3/09/2009)
On the other hand, from real 2009 Honda Fit owners, I've only heard great things about its practicality and significant improvements over the first generation model as well as being just as fun to drive, if not better.
Reply
Aprime 2:07PM (3/09/2009)
It is peppier than its predecessor, it also feels faster, more agile and responsible than a Civic.
Aprime 4:37PM (3/09/2009)
... make that *responsive
Rev 7:18PM (3/09/2009)
"Peppy" and "responsive" were not things that came to mind when driving the McFit "sport". "Slow", "unresponsive" and "appliance" were about the nicest things I could think of...
naggs 3:03AM (3/11/2009)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...ugh...
it is responsive, the engine is actually very responsive. if you have a manual you can take advantage of that. compared to anything else in its class right now, choice is obvious