Chicago 2009: SHO Starter - Ford Taurus SHO kicks off Chicago

Click above for high-res image gallery of the 2010 Ford Taurus SHO
We've just dashed back to the media center from the first press conference of the 2009 Chicago Auto Show where Ford unveiled the new 2010 Taurus SHO to the whoops and cries of SHO enthusiasts. We sat directly in front of a group of identically SHO-shirted "inner circle" faithful that Ford had brought from 11 different states to mark the occasion, and we were privy to more than a few honest-sounding gasps and slack jaws when the horsepower figure (365) was officially announced ("Jesus. Rock #$%@ing on!").
In the metal, the Blue Oval's highest-performance SHO builds very discretely on the standard Taurus's muscular new bodywork, with a unique dark-gray grille and matching 19- or 20-inch alloys, along with distinct parking lamp bezels, a modest decklid spoiler and obligatory badging. Much to our editor-in-chief's chagrin, Ford chose to roll out the new model in maroon and silver, oddly foregoing the SHO-only Atlantis Green hue, but both examples looked attractive in their respective paints.
If Ford has missed an obvious aesthetic trick with the SHO, it's with the engine, which is hidden under an innocuous black plastic cover. SHO enthusiasts have practically made scale jewelry out of the first- and second-generation Taurus SHO's Yamaha V-6 engine and its prominent intake runners, and the new Ecoboost engine looks utterly undistinguished. Thankfully, the twin-turbo 3.5-liter V-6 should provide enough performance to win over the diehards.
Given how many Tauruses (Taurii?) are likely to populate America's roads over the next few years, the SHO is likely to be a first-class sleeper, so subtle are its visual modifications. In any case, Ford isn't shying away from comparing their new baby with flashier, more expensive cars, casually noting that the car's performance figures should compare favorably with BMW's 5-Series and Chrysler's 300C all-wheel drive, the latter of which marketing and communications vice-president, Jim Farley, proudly notes is $900 pricier. Check out our gallery of live shots below, and then jump back to our Officially Official information post by clicking here.
Gallery: Chicago 2009: 2010 Ford Taurus SHO
Gallery: 2010 Ford Taurus SHO
Live photos copyright ©2009 Drew Phillips / Weblogs, Inc.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
MemphisNET 11:52AM (2/11/2009)
This car IS awesome, BUT perhaps its time for the SHO name to become a modern day PVO/SRT or SVT etc. Next in the SHO lineup? Fusion, Fiesta, Focus?
Reply
M. Pickles 1:14PM (2/11/2009)
Having owned a 1st gen (89) SHO, I'm a little excited about this one. I think it looks pretty hot in its understated form, though I think I'd also find it too big. But if I were looking into the future say when I'm old and need a fat ass car, this might be a great used buy in 3-4 years and the last car I would need to own for the next 30 years (yeah right). Kinda like grandpa's old 70 Chevy Impala I always wanted as a kid, my future grand kids might want my old ride. I'd be more excited if they'd stick that turbo 6 in the Fusion with AWD though that's fersure.
Mazda FTW! 11:53AM (2/11/2009)
Thats a HUGE car!!! But I guess so is the 300C.
Reply
MemphisNET 11:56AM (2/11/2009)
Agreed, it's a good competitor, and a fantastic car, but they really do need a smaller 'SHO' car.
Derek 6:46PM (2/11/2009)
+1, this thing is a boat next to the original SHO which had been right in the size range I like.
ichime 11:57AM (2/11/2009)
FO SHO
This is now the new nickname for this car (Fo, short for Ford, as in FoMoCo) and the rest is pretty obvious.
Reply
BoneHeadOtto 3:48PM (2/11/2009)
Personally i vote for
FoMoCoSHOMoFo :)
Jared 11:58AM (2/11/2009)
The rear spoiler looks cheezy and the interior is pretty drab. I'm not a fan of the fake carbon fiber dash.
Reply
typhoon5000 12:29PM (2/11/2009)
That's not supposed to be fake carbon fiber because it is real aluminum
Jared 1:44PM (2/11/2009)
I stand corrected on the dash appliques being carbon fiber. I think they still look ugly and drab in the pictures. Hopefully they'll look better in person.
Alex 11:59AM (2/11/2009)
I really want this to be a success for Ford. We are long overdue for a new SHO and this one looks to fit the bill nicely.
Reply
Jei 1:02PM (2/11/2009)
I agree. I don't what Ford to "try" to put too much high-end-looking details/materials into the SHO unless they do it RIGHT. Otherwise, they end up having this street-sleeper car with bad/cheesy finishes that will decrease its overall credibility.
David 2:00PM (2/11/2009)
I still can't get over the "lifted straight out of grandma's 500" style steering wheel and gauge cluster. Come on Ford - it looks downright pedestrian and unacceptable in a SHO product, especially considering the competition.
Reply
psu48187 4:01PM (2/11/2009)
The wheel and gauge cluster are not lifted out of a 500. Go look at some interior pictures.
Chris 12:05PM (2/11/2009)
Never thought I'd hear the words Ford Taurus and twin turbo (stock) in the same sentence
Reply
MajorGeek 12:09PM (2/11/2009)
There is a group of people waiting for an SHO? Thats sort of weird really. However, its a really nice looking car. As you guys said, a small version might be nice. I really wish (again) people would look at Jeep and see how they made 3 or 4 models of the same style, all with different size, purpose and trail rating (or lack of). Don't know why the still fugly Ford Ranger can not take on the shape of the F150 for example.
Reply
mww0614 8:37PM (2/11/2009)
There is a huge following for the SHO. I think its a little funny that you didn't know that. You must not follow the automotive world at all.
Matt 12:42PM (2/11/2009)
Because the F-150 is hideous...
Javanese 12:17PM (2/11/2009)
Great looking car and 360 odd bhp would come real handy when dealing with kids in hondas.
Reply
Erik 12:30PM (2/11/2009)
Great looking car - should be a real sleeper. Huge Boooooooooo on the transmission though. I'm sorry, but no matter where you put the gear selector, an auto is an auto. A ride like this deserves a real stick.
Reply