• Feb 9, 2009
2009 Volkswagen Jetta TDI – Click above for high-res image gallery

The car as we know it is being redefined. Hybrids have reintroduced electrons to the driving experience, and the rumble, shake and shimmy of the internal combustion engine is being muffled and, in some cases, even silenced by cars like the Toyota Prius, 2011 Chevy Volt and Tesla Roadster.

For us to continue harnessing the energy of combustion under our hoods, we need to go much further on a gallon of fuel. Enter Volkswagen and the diesel-powered passenger cars it's been selling in the U.S. since the late '70s, the latest of which is the 2009 Jetta TDI. Follow the jump to find out how VW's newest diesel fares against the electrified future of the automobile.



Photos copyright ©2009 John Neff / Weblogs, Inc.

Most U.S. customers have largely ignored VW diesels. Early examples had their quirks, including an engine rattle that sounded like a Peterbilt and the propensity to puff out black smoke like a coal miner. Still, they could go twice as far on a tank of diesel compared to gas-powered cars and their engines lasted for hundreds of thousands of miles. A cult following has kept them going and many have been converted to run on vegetable oil and other bio-fuel blends.



It will be years before we know if the new 2.0-liter four-cylinder turbocharged diesel engine powering the Jetta TDI is as bulletproof as its predecessors, but we can tell you that its fuel efficiency is as impressive as ever. The EPA has rated the car at 30 miles-per-gallon in the city and 41 mpg on the highway. VW felt the EPA test cycle wasn't accurate and hired an independent company called AMCI to run more real world tests that yielded even better results: 38 mpg city/ 44 mpg highway.

We had the opportunity to take our TDI tester, which was *ahem* obviously provided by BOSCH, on a trip from Cleveland to Pittsburgh. We were specifically curious to find out if achieving similar highway fuel economy numbers as the EPA and AMCI required a hypermiler's touch, or if our lead-infused feet could manage equally respectable numbers. Long story short: Our best average fuel economy was 46.1 mpg on the highway.



The current fuel economy champ in the U.S. is the Toyota Prius, which the EPA rates at 48 mpg city/45 mpg highway. What makes the Jetta TDI so impressive is that it doesn't require a complex hybrid drivetrain to achieve similar results. The straightforward design of Rudolph Diesel's engine and an interstate, highway or autobahn is all that's required. In fact, the Jetta TDI doesn't even require a cross-country trip to show its stuff. Hop on the highway and within minutes the trip information display will report an average of 40+ mpg. Though high-speed cruising is when this powertrain is most efficient, we also achieved results in the mid to high 30-mpg range while running errands around town.



We didn't resort to drafting semis or cruising at insufferably slow speeds, either. Our average cruising speed was around 65 mph, and the only trick we pulled was shifting into Neutral down steep grades to keep some of the momentum that engine friction would have sapped away. The simple average mpg readout in the trip computer display was all it took to get us hooked on trying to improve our efficiency.

Most Americans have never driven a diesel-powered vehicle, let alone compared one with a gas-powered competitor. We have and can tell you that the experience of driving a diesel is markedly different. Aside from being less fuel efficient, gas-powered four-cylinder engines have to work much harder to keep you cruising. They're often described as loud and "buzzy" because highway speeds require most to turn over at a rate of 3,000 rpm or more.



Volkswagen's new 2.0-liter turbodiesel, which was named one of Ward's Auto's Top 10 Engines of 2009, runs at just 1,800 rpm while cruising between 65 and 70 mph, so the Jetta TDI feels and sounds more like a car powered by a large, unencumbered V6. It's relaxed and anything but buzzy, accomplishing all of its work below a 4,500 rpm redline that ensures things never get hectic underhood. Also gone is the knock, clatter and clang characteristic of past diesels. The Jetta TDI is as quiet as a luxury car on the highway, and though the diesel can be heard while idling, the entire car is eerily vibration free while sitting at a stop light.

The '09 model is also significantly quicker than VW diesels of the past, taking a tick above eight seconds to reach 60 mph, but even that metric doesn't tell the whole story. Though rated at only 140 horsepower, the engine's 236 lb-ft of torque means there's power aplenty. While off-the-line acceleration won't scare any sports cars, the Jetta TDI exhibits an effortless thrust when the right pedal is pushed. Whiplash inducing it's not, but the wave of power this little engine produces while underway is remarkable for its size.



Diesel engines have always been known their stump-pulling power, but they also have a reputation for being dirtier than gas engines. This became an issue a few years ago when California and the Environmental Protection Agency enacted their corresponding LEV II and Tier 2 Bin 5 emissions standards that erased the distinction between diesel- and gas-powered engines.

The modern diesel engine required major work to meet these new standards and gain access to markets in all 50 states, and most companies resorted to injecting a urea-based solution ahead of the catalytic converter that specifically targets the most harmful particulates like Nitrogen oxides (NOx). This solution, so to speak, was less than ideal because of the extra effort required to refill the solution at regular intervals. Volkswagen, in partnership with BOSCH, has developed a diesel engine for the Jetta TDI that's clean enough for sale in all 50 states without the use of a urea-based exhaust treatment system.

The trick is the use of a particulate filter in the exhaust system that requires zero maintenance from the driver. When the filter becomes full of harmful particulates, the engine's ECU will adjust the air/fuel ratio to raise exhaust temperatures high enough to burn them off. This process occurs every 300-500 miles and is all but transparent to the driver. Since raising exhaust temperatures requires a richer air/fuel ratio Fuel economy suffers slightly during this process, which we experienced on our way to Pittsburgh when we noticed a sudden but temporary 1.5-2 mpg drop in fuel economy.



The Jetta TDI isn't all about saving us from buying a few extra barrels of foreign oil. It also happens to be a dynamic small car with above average moves. The independent suspension with 16-inch alloys at all four corners exhibits typical German tightness with a solid ride that's not easily shaken. The standard, gas-powered Jetta has always been ahead of the economy car curve in this regard, and the TDI version is that much more so compared to cars like the Prius with its myopic focus on fuel efficiency at the expense of driving pleasure.

Another thing you're not going to get with a hybrid is transmission choices since most use a highly efficient CVT, or continuously variable transmission. Volkswagen offers two transmissions for the Jetta TDI: a good, old six-speed manual and six-speed DSG dual-clutch transmission with manual and Sport modes. Operating the row-your-own version is an above average experience for a small car, but the DSG is where you want to put your money. The latter will act like an everyday automatic if left to its own devices, but slip the stick over a notch and you're in control of precise shifts that occur quicker than you could make them yourself. VW deserves a double ding, however, for the lack of steering wheel-mounted paddle shifters and arranging the DSG's manual control as forward for up-shifts and backward for down-shifts.



There's still more decisions to make if you're considering the Jetta TDI, as VW also offers a SportWagen model in addition to the sedan. The four-door offers a 16-cubic-foot trunk, but the wagon goes above and beyond with 33 cu ft behind the rear seats and 67 when they're folded. While you may pay a small mpg penalty for the extra weight, the SportWagen TDI offers an unrivaled combination of utility and fuel efficiency in the marketplace. The EPA, however, reports the same results for SportWagen TDI as the Jetta TDI sedan: 30 mpg city/41 mpg highway.



For most, the decision to buy an exceptionally fuel efficient car like the Jetta TDI has less to do with making Mother Earth your BFF than saving money on fuel costs. The irony is that breaking the 40-mpg barrier adds a significant price premium to the up front cost of a car. In the case of the Jetta, the TDI version carries an MSRP of $22,270 versus the comparably equipped, gas-powered SE model that starts at $20,095. You may have noticed, however, that the Jetta TDI also qualifies for a $1,300 tax credit that more than halves the up front price premium, though that will only apply for the first 60,000 units VW sells.

Then there's the cost of diesel fuel to consider. When we topped of our tank, the price of diesel at our local station was $3.70/gallon versus $2.60/gallon for regular unleaded. Prices for both fuels have fallen since then, but the national average for diesel is still higher at $2.24/gallon versus $1.89/gallon. You will, however, go much farther on a tank full of diesel. Using EPA numbers, a Jetta TDI with 14.5 gallons of diesel could conservatively travel 595 miles on the highway before hitting empty, whereas our real world experience of over 46.1 mpg equates to 668 miles. A manual-equipped Jetta SE using a gas-powered 2.5-liter five-cylinder engine with 14.5 gallons of regular unleaded would stop on the highway after 450 miles.


The Jetta TDI has won us over because it offers what no hybrid on the market does: flexibility. Not only does it come in sedan or wagon form with your choice of transmission, but its mere existence represents an alternative for car shoppers who want fuel efficiency, but not at the expense of enjoying the car they drive.

Volkswagen will add to this equation by offering a TDI version of its Rabbit hatchback this fall using the same 2.0-liter TDI engine, and may also sell a street version of the Jetta TDI race cars that compete in the Jetta TDI Cup. There's also the Touareg V6 TDI on sale now and the Aud A3 TDI arriving later this year for those who need more utility or want extra luxury.

The 2009 Volkswagen Jetta TDI is a push back against our future of electrified motoring, and VW/Audi will soon be offering more diesel-powered models in the U.S. than ever before. A world that has silenced the sound of pistons pumping is not preordained, and the Jetta TDI proves that there is a way to meet stricter fuel economy standards without sapping the fun of driving from point A to point B with as many turns in between as possible.



Photos copyright ©2009 John Neff / Weblogs, Inc.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 35 Comments
      • 5 Years Ago
      I'm still a bit curious why we haven't heard any push for diesel to be more in line with gas on the price. We've got the 3 tiers of gas that are pretty close together, but you don't hear much if at all about pegging diesel to the premium fuel price (or something similar).

      Does that old excuse of supply/demand for home heating out still work now that cars use ULSD?
      • 5 Years Ago
      Great review, I've yet to find a more frugal and fun car for highway cruises... just curious though, how much is GM paying for little quips like this:

      "Toyota Prius, 2011 Chevy Volt... Tesla". Last I checked, the Volt hasn't been driven i production form and isn't on sale, and that 2011 date is the result of continued back pedaling on GM's part. Isn't it a bit early to mention it matter of fact as heralding electric driving when the car's not out yet, and won't be out for a year or so at the earliest?
      • 5 Years Ago
      It is not the diesel engines that have been unreliable. The engines are exceptionally good. It is the rest of the VW that had a history of reliability. VW has been getting better reliability reviews lately [as of the last few years].
      • 5 Years Ago
      Does anybody know which VW diesel engines the author thinks were bulletproof? I've read nothing but bad things about Volkswagon reliability.
        • 5 Years Ago
        It is not the diesel engines that have been unreliable. It is the rest of the VW that had a history of reliability. VW has been getting better reliability reviews lately.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Tom - you have an 05 GTI and 06 Jetta and have had "very few issues" with BOTH?

      That means there is a reliability problem! Just because it's fixed under warranty doesn't mean it's not reliable.

      A REAL reliable car (Camry, Civic, Corolla, Accord) can go 80k + miles without so much as an oil change/tire rotation.

      When my best friend had his 03 gti and I had my 03 tiburon we both ALWAYS had problems. It was who is going to pick up who from the dealer this week. His coil pack went, window fell into the door, his seat adjustor broke and his seat would slide forward at every stop light..lol.. it was a nightmare!
        • 5 Years Ago
        I would not recommend waiting 80K miles to do the first oil change on a vehicle. ;) Not even if it is a Toyota or Honda.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Amazing review: it was very detailed and well-thought out in its comments. I honestly don't think hybrids will ever be as fun as diesels due to the relative lack of torque and the power-sapping technologies used in the name of fuel efficiency (both in hybrids).
      • 5 Years Ago
      For the last time - downshifting and coasting in gear while utilizing engine braking to slow the car down DOES NOT PREMATURELY WEAR OUT THE CLUTCH. I don't know where this preposterous idea came from but it's simply not true. The only thing that wears out the clutch is the process of engaging and disengaging it(disc slipping when engaging and TO bearing when disengaging it). Once the clutch is fully engaged, there is NO WEAR ON IT!
      • 5 Years Ago
      Great review and lucky are the new owners of a TDI. While the upfront cost of this car may be comparably higher to some, consider also the resale values are great. In Canada at least, every time I see a TDI in the used car pages, it is priced between $3-4K above gas Jettas', even with significantly higher mileage. I wouldn't lease one, but to actually own it absolutely.
      • 5 Years Ago

      This must be the only non-luxury Diesel in the US right now.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Good review, for a tame fuel efficient car, it definitely seems like a wise choice. But I'm curious to see what the Street TDI Cup Racer will bring, because this one seems just a little too boring to drive every day. I know if you're considering a diesel, most people sacrifice performance fun, but it would be nice to have both and hopefully the TDI Cup will offer that.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Yeah, the cup cars have the same motor, and its simply not a performance motor. VW makes some more powerful I4 diesels, but its likely that we will never see those.
        • 5 Years Ago
        If we get the TDI Cup version of the Jetta, I'd assume that it would take the form of something like a TDI version of the GLI. In which case, it would likely get an upgraded suspension and such.

        Depending on the pricing they would go for, I think it would more prudent to buy a stock TDI Jetta and perform any upgrades yourself. Surely companies will be offering chips for the new TDI as they did for previous versions(likely to boost the engine to at least the 170hp of the Cup version). Aftermarket suspension upgrades are readily available as well.

        quote from LS2LS7: -
        "A stock Integra (or TSX-S) would run rings around those cars, and it gets quite good mpg also." -

        I assume you meant the RSX-S and not TSX as there hasn't been a Type-S version of the TSX yet and it wouldn't be in the same class as the Integra(even though it was considered the successor of both).

        So, you've resorted to comparing out of production vehicles in order to prove a point? What does it matter if the RSX-S or Integra would be a better track car than a TDI Cup car? So would a lot of vehicles, that's not the point.

        The idea is that a consumer version of the TDI Cup car would likely make it the fastest and best-handling vehicle which is also focused on high MPG's as well. Name another vehicle that can achieve 40MPG hwy(which neither the 28mpg RSX-S or 28mpg Integra would come close to based on their EPA figures) which would handle as good as a Jetta TDI Cup car would? There is nothing else short of a sport bike(if that), Tesla, or kit car(Atom or the like possibly) which would even come close.

        It's a high mileage car for drivers who don't place handling at the bottom of their list of wanted attributes in a car and it's also affordable(see Tesla).
        • 5 Years Ago
        I did mean RSX-S.

        I could have used in-production vehicles like the 31mpg GTI or the 30mpg Cobalt SS. I didn't, because I was trying to use a very common vehicle.

        I doubt a consumer version of the TDI Cup car would outhandle the BMW MINI Cooper S, nor out accelerate it. And it is an mpg-oriented car, making 34mpg highway, which is energy (and efficiency and CO2) equivalent to a 39mpg Diesel (given the extra energy in a gallon of Diesel fuel).
        • 5 Years Ago
        Judging by the TDI Cup races (I watched all of them), you're not going to get a ton of performance even if you had an actual TDI Cup car from the track. A stock Integra (or TSX-S) would run rings around those cars, and it gets quite good mpg also.
      • 5 Years Ago
      A couple things. First of all, we need to go farther on a barrel of oil, as such the energy content of the fuel itself must be taken into account. This wipes away 15% of Diesel's advantage.

      Second of all, the idea that the clatter and such is gone is RIDICULOUS. Yes, these are much quieter than before, there's no doubt. But when I was walking from my car into work the other day, there was a new Jetta near the door (parked across two handicap spots) letting people out. I could hear from 80 feet away it was making more clatter than usual (at idle!) and walking up to it confirmed it was a Diesel. There's no doubt these are more livable than before, but when you can tell what kind of fuel it is using before you can read the badges on the car, the clatter is not gone.

      And finally, although not as complex as a hybrid, this vehicle is not straightforward like Diesel's design. 29,000psi injectors are not straightforward and nor is the addition of a turbocharger and intercooler. These are very complex engines, just not as complex as a hybrid.

      And finally, on a more personal note, I still find it disgusting that companies are allowed to advertise fuel economy figures other than the EPA ones. If I competed against VW I'd retaliate by hiring someone to report more advantageous fuel figures for my vehicles too.
        • 5 Years Ago
        I don't know that EPA figures for hybrids are terribly inflated anymore. The Prius hasn't been rated at 60mpg for years.

        The EPA has not admitted that Diesel figures are inaccurate. You really need to read the source material. Click on my name and look for some of my Diesel rants. This 18% figure only shows up in one place, and that is when comparing EPA figures to an internet poll. This same poll says high mpg gas cars (not hybrids, just gas cars with >30mpg) are also 10% underrated. These figures (either of them) are not corroborated by other figures that come from more controlled studies in the same report.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Are you sure that was the new diesel? vw sold the new jetta with their older diesel in 2006-07, stopped in 08, and now came out for 09 with the new engine. I know the previous engine was quite loud, but if everybody says this engine is quiet then it most likely is, at least from the inside of the cabin.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Nice to see somebody actually point out how really complex the new diesels are. The last Ford F350 I tested, when I raised the hood I couldn't even find the block! At the same time, hybrids are getting a bit simpler (and the Prius actually has a very simple transmission and engine, and really low maintenance requirements). A Mercedes engineer I talked to went on for 10 minutes about how they build identically sized V6s, one diesel and one gas, and the Blue Tec is light years more complicated.

        Great post.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Will:
        Listing figures is useless if everyone gets to make up their own figures. If companies are allowed to advertise figures other than the EPA ones, then they might as well not advertise EPA figures at all. Well, close to it.

        What I'm saying about with efficiency is that efficiency is "energy put to work" divided by "energy put in". To change the bottom to "gallons of fuel put in" is to misstate what efficiency is. In a Diesel, when you put a gallon of fuel in, you are putting in 15% more energy than when you put a gallon of gas in. This must be accounted for in any real efficiency figure, in that the Diesel would have to go 15% further on a gallon of Diesel to even be as efficient as the gas car. Of course, Diesels usually go more than 15% further on a gallon of fuel than gas cars.

        montoym:
        If the EPA really figured that YourMPG was the way to go, wouldn't they have raised the fuel efficiency figures for high mpg gas cars (which were shown to be half as far off in that comparison as Diesels were)? But they did not.

        To say that the EPA changing their figures endorses YourMPG is to completely ignore every point that doesn't favor Diesels. People are concentrating on a single data point in that report, somehow trying to say it is the one that defined the EPA's strategy.

        Do I think hybrids would have been as popular with different mpg figures? Yes. In the timeframe that the old EPA figures were used, people were buying hybrids more for image than anything. Or they were buying them to get into carpool lanes during rush hour while driving alone. I don't feel that reduced EPA estimates would have impeded them from selling as well as they did, because people weren't buying the cars for the EPA estimates.

        Last time you accused me of being anti-Diesel when I expressed a general skepticism of internet poll figures. This despite me pointing out that other figures (high MPG gas cars) also are a bit suspect. And if you want to box me as pro-hybrid, know I don't own a hybrid and my next car won't be a hybrid either. I do have friends who are very happy with their hybrids. Many even exceed the new EPA figures (but not the old ones), but I can tell you it is clearly because they have adopted techniques to increase their mpg, techniques which would apply to regular-old cars too. And finally, most are happy with their hybrids most of all because they can drive home at rush hour in the carpool lane.

        As to me not bitching that other companies are advertising non-EPA figures, you couldn't be more wrong. There are very few companies that do so, but one is Ford with the Fusion hybrid, and I complained about that too. To be honest, I'm having trouble finding it with google, but I have more than once pleaded with autoblog to not be a party to helping ANY company promote non-EPA figures for any vehicle of any sort (hybrid, Diesel, horse-drawn, etc.)

        Here's me bitching about it for Ford trucks:
        http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/26/video-mike-rowe-takes-on-dirty-job-of-comparing-full-size-picku/
        I looked back two months and I cannot find my other posts about this. You'll just have to trust me on this. We need standardized testing so people can compare vehicles more accurately. Otherwise, companies will just all make their own standards which favor themselves.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Are you sure that the noisey Jetta that you saw was a 2009 model? The 2006 has the same sedan body style but uses the older PD engine. The only way to tell from the outside is to look at the TDI badge. The new ones have a blue I, whereas the letters on the older ones are all silver.
        • 5 Years Ago
        I find it far more disgusting that the hybrids' fuel efficiency is so incredibly inflated by the EPA test cycle. Those cars never would have gotten a market foot hold if it wasn't for the EPA's grossly overestimated numbers.

        Why should a manufacturer be forced to market numbers that the EPA themselves have admitted to not being very good estimates?
        • 5 Years Ago
        quote from LS2LS7: -
        "I don't know that EPA figures for hybrids are terribly inflated anymore. The Prius hasn't been rated at 60mpg for years.

        The EPA has not admitted that Diesel figures are inaccurate. You really need to read the source material. Click on my name and look for some of my Diesel rants. This 18% figure only shows up in one place, and that is when comparing EPA figures to an internet poll. This same poll says high mpg gas cars (not hybrids, just gas cars with >30mpg) are also 10% underrated. These figures (either of them) are not corroborated by other figures that come from more controlled studies in the same report." -

        I agree that hybrid ratings are far more accurate now than they ever were before thanks to the EPA's '08 updates. However do you think hybrids would have become as popular if their accurate mileage had been advertised originally instead of the 60mpg claims they originally were listed with? That's what MBS was speaking of from my understanding.

        Secondly, the Prius was rated at 60mpg as recently as the '07 model year. The new EPA guidelines didn't take effect until 2008. I guess 2yrs does qualify as "for years" but you make it sound as though it's been much more than the 2 years it actually has been.

        In regards to your last section, I've posted about this same topic before in response to you.

        That same source material also mentions that the YourMPG data has been used in the past to help determine inaccuracies in the EPA testing and was part of the reason the EPA updated their testing to what we have now. You'll note that the data for hybrids is now much more in line with what is reported on YourMPG because of the changes the EPA made in their testing.

        So, obviously the EPA feels that the YourMPG data is valid and meaningful and it may help to rectify the diesel disadvantage that currently exists.

        Basically, you definitely have a strong bias and double standard that is readily apparent in any post you make regarding diesels. I admit that I am biased as well, but I do not feel that I am inserting a double standard because of it.

        For instance, you claim disgust with any company that utilizes 3rd party testing to refute EPA claims(of which VW is hardly the only culprit), yet you do not seem one bit concerned that the Prius(and other early hybrids) benefitted from inaccurate testing which greatly enhanced their mileage figures. EPA or not, the figures were a gross misrepresentation of the actual mileage that a buyer could expect. I'm fairly certain Toyota knew it as well but they obviously weren't going to say anything about it. Diesels are currently experiencing the same problem, but on the other end and I think that is far more damaging to VW than any damage that Toytota's sales took due to the Prius's inaccuracy.

        • 5 Years Ago
        camper - isn't the extra energy that diesel has per gallon more than taken into account with its price differential?
      • 5 Years Ago
      Great review. I recently bought a TDI sportwagen. It really is as close to the perfect family car as I could find. It is really quite luxurious from heated seats to satellite radio to one touch power windows all around. Our only option was the super full length sunroof. The wagon also has really great trunk space.

      A few points. In Missouri, regular gas is $1.77, but premium gas is $1.97. Diesel is $2.07. So worth it when I look at the gas powered cars I was considering. Gas mileage however really is affected by how much you stomp on the gas. It's even tougher that this car really is a lot of fun to stomp on the gas in. In town I'm only getting 29-30 mpg for this reason, but that's much better than the 16 -17 mpg we got on the minivan we traded in. And is probbly better than what I get in our 2002 mini cooper in town. If you drive on the highway at 80+ as I usually do you (don't tell the guy from BC with his legal issues) you will only get about 36 mpg. This may get better as the car is still only 700 miles old.

      Regarding the huge number of very educated comments on coasting vs just letting up on the gas: In this car the real time fuel economy meter blanks out when you drive downhill with just enough gas to maintain speed. As the grade evens out it starts out by reading 130+ mpg and then rapidly lowers. I took this to support the view that it's just fine to keep the car in gear downhill.

    • Load More Comments