Review: 2009 Chevy Tahoe LTZ 6.2L 4x4

2009 Chevy Tahoe LTZ 6.2L 4x4 – Click above for high-res image gallery
For a long time, gas prices in the United States were literally cheaper than dirt. Seriousl – check out the price of a bag of top soil at your local home improvement store. With such low fuel prices, the cost of operating a motor vehicle was really not much of an issue for most Americans. As a result, the only cost that concerned Americans when buying a vehicle was the monthly payment. People bought what ever they could afford on a monthly basis, not at the pump.
The result was the rise of the personal use truck, and in particular, the sport utility vehicle. It started slowly in the 1980s with the Jeep Cherokee and really picked up steam with the launch of the Ford Explorer. As the Nineties wore on, people moved into even bigger full-size SUVs and the Chevy Tahoe was among the most successful up until the last few years. That's when sales hit a brick wall as gas prices finally started to climb.
We recently got to spend some quality time with a 2009 Chevy Tahoe LTZ and its big 6.2-lliter V8. Follow the jump to see if this behemoth still has what it takes to charm consumers now that gas prices have ebbed.
Photos Copyright ©2009 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.
2008 was a horrible time to be in the business of making big trucks, with every brand getting hammered hard first as gas prices went to $4 per gallon and then during the financial collapse in the Fall. Sales of the Tahoe dropped by more than 37 percent last year to just 91,578 units. Even at that level, the Tahoe was still the best-selling full-size SUV in America by a wide margin. Among those were several thousand hybrid models as they became widely available for the first time.

For this visit to the Autoblog Garage however, General Motors sent over a loaded LTZ model with a 6.2-liter V8 cranking out 395 horsepower at a surprisingly lofty 5,600 rpm and 417 lb-ft of torque at 4,300 rpm. General Motors likes to advertise that it offers more models that achieve over 30 miles-per-gallon on the highway than any other automaker, but with all of that power on tap, this Tahoe is understandably not one of them.


At a distance, the Tahoe's styling belies its dimensions. Its overall proportions with its short overhangs and tidy detailing give a handsome impression. Compared to the now euthanized Trailblazer EXT, the Tahoe doesn't look as top-heavy and clumsy. At the front, there's no doubt that this is a contemporary Chevrolet thanks to the dual port grille. Unlike the hybrid, this one doesn't have the deep front air dam and at least looks like it could handle crawling over some boulders without getting into too much trouble.

As you walk up close, it becomes immediately apparent just how big the Tahoe is. At 16.8 feet long and 6.4 feet tall, the Tahoe towers over its little brother, the Aveo. For those who like the whole command seating approach where you can see over traffic, at least the traffic that isn't driving a Tahoe or something similar, this thing fits the bill. The test unit we drove also had optional 20-inch chromed wheels that fill out the wheel wells. Given the step up into the Tahoe, the standard running boards also come in handy for entry/exit.


The first two rows of seats in the high-zoot LTZ version are clad in tan-colored leather, and the seats themselves have heating and cooling circuits. During our time with the Tahoe, overnight temperatures here in southeast Michigan dipped low into the single digits. Fortunately, the Tahoe was equipped with a remote starter on the key fob allowing the SUV to be started from the comfort of the author's home. One particularly handy feature given the frigid morning weather was that the remote start also triggered the seat heaters, preventing a frozen bottom upon hitting the cold leather.
The second row captains chairs are also heated and flip forward to allow access to the third row. They can't be completely removed but the seatbacks do fold flat. Because the Tahoe has a live rear axle, the rear floor has to be fairly high to allow clearance for the motion of the differential. Since the third row seats sit on the floor, occupants end up in a knees-up seating position that isn't particularly comfortable for adults. Those who really want to utilize the third row would be better off opting for the longer wheelbase Suburban.

The third row seats also don't fold flat into the floor, so maximizing rear cargo space requires completely removing the seats. That's accomplished by pulling up a lever and then grabbing the handle and pulling the whole seat back and out. With the third row seat removed and the middle row folded forward, we were able to load an old sectional sofa in the back to haul it to the local reuse center. Of course, we had to do it one section at a time, but nonetheless, it's a task we couldn't have accomplished with in a passenger car.
How you feel about driving the Tahoe will depend on how you feel about driving in general and how you plan to use it. Anyone who prefers a sporting drive will be disappointed with the Tahoe, or any other similar SUV for that matter. The nearly 400-hp V8 provides plenty of grunt and moves the 5,500-lb Tahoe without breathing hard. The brakes are vastly improved compared to GM trucks of a decade ago. The pedal still feels a bit over-boosted, but the brakes are fairly easy to modulate and there doesn't seem to be the six inches of free play that older models exhibit.


The steering also lacks any noticeable free play right off center and motions of the wheel translate directly into directional changes. The effort required to turn the wheel, however, is too light and there is no real feedback... but GM doesn't market the Tahoe as an alternative to the Porsche Cayenne, right? When the snow falls, however, the Tahoe shines. Its four-wheel drive system allows it to plow right through several inches of fresh powder with a reassuring sure-footedness. The ABS, traction and stability control systems work together smoothly without feeling overly intrusive.


We didn't have an opportunity to test the towing capability during its weeklong stay, but the spec sheet lists an 8,200-pound towing capacity for the 4X4 Tahoe with the 6.2L V8 engine. The rear-wheel-drive model increases that to 8,500 pounds. Based on our past towing experience with GM trucks, we have no reason to doubt those numbers. The Tahoe also has a tow/haul switch that changes the standard programming of the 6-speed automatic transmission. Activating tow/haul holds gears longer, prevents hunting and triggers downshifts to incur more engine braking.
All the capability of the Tahoe brings with it a thirst for refined petroleum. The EPA rates the 6.2-liter LTZ at 12 miles-per-gallon city and 19 mpg on the highway. During our week with the Tahoe, it managed a mere 12.4 mpg, a figure certainly not helped by the chilly temperatures. Warmer temps and a light throttle foot could probably bring that number up to 15-16 in combined driving. For 2009, the 6.2L engine also has flex-fuel capability, so highly subsidized corn-based fuel becomes an option if you have an E85 pump in the neighborhood.


While the mileage figure was low, the price tag wasn't. The 4WD LTZ starts at $50,900 and ours had an out-the-door bottom line of $57,335 delivered. That includes the $4,790 Sun, Entertainment and Destination package, which will guide you to where you want to go with the in-dash nav system and keep the munchkins entertained with the rear seat DVD system, among other items.

Fifty-seven grand is a lot of money in these harsh economic times, so it's no surprise that sales of the Tahoe and its ilk are suffering. For many people who don't often have a use for such vehicles, a truck or SUV is a great thing to borrow from a friend. Others, however, have a real need for vehicles like the Tahoe that can tow and haul more people and cargo than a passenger car or a comparably-sized crossover. If you don't need the towing power offered by the 6.2-liter V8, there are also 4.8-liter and 5.3-liter models with less of the luxury goods that start around $37,000. Those who need the space and utility but want better fuel economy can also go for the two-mode hybrid model. Of course, all of the aforementioned prices border on the hypothetical since the Tahoe and its siblings are loaded down with incentives these days. So if you're the person who really needs what the Tahoe has to offer, now may be the best time to buy. Just make sure you can afford the payments at the pump.
Photos Copyright ©2009 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.








Get a WordPress.com Blog




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Rob 12:12PM (2/05/2009)
LTZ= Lutz? Man, that guy definitely has some sort of complex.
Reply
cs 12:26PM (2/05/2009)
It seems that way doesn't it? Though LTZ is a model designation Chevrolet's had for years. I think it originated around the early 90s, with a Caprice and Corsica in the trim. It fades in and out...there was a late 90s Lumina LTZ, and then it returned around 2006.
Sea Urchin 12:37PM (2/05/2009)
With his EGO anything is possible.
From My Cube 12:15PM (2/05/2009)
i really like the look...but so expensive
Reply
lu1de 7:01AM (2/06/2009)
I love the exterior but the interior and gas mileage are horrible.
TKE 12:17PM (2/05/2009)
Seen stickers on the sides of new Avalanche/Tahoe/Suburban lately advertising a genuine $17,000 off - that's without harming good financing rates or tacking on some 84 month payment plan. Very hard to judge cars based on MSRP these days.
Reply
Mazda FTW! 12:18PM (2/05/2009)
I love the look. I'm from India and this sort of vehicle has that "American" look to me. And compared to the X6s and new Acuras, it's clean-cut. A very refreshing vehicle.
Reply
Rick 12:45PM (2/05/2009)
Why?
Reply
Seminole 12:56PM (2/05/2009)
Why not?
MajorGeek 12:23PM (2/05/2009)
The Tahoe and all its variants have always been great looking trucks. Im suprised they have not made a crossover based on the same look with a 4 and\or 6 cylinder. Jeep did it.
Reply
Chris Carey 12:26PM (2/05/2009)
I'm probably one of the few people who could afford and need a Tahoe. While shopping we noticed one big flaw with the Tahoe. The rear row while handy is just about unusable. Entry into the third row is hard compared to other SUVs and once you are in there is no place for your legs, even little kids. Also once the 3rd row is up there is no room behind the seats for cargo. So lets imagine you have four kids...and are going on a trip. First off the rear passengers will be really grumpy and you better pack lightly because once you have those rows up you can't take much with you.
We ended up getting the Dodge Durango instead because you can fit people back there and there is room for cargo. Also since we choose the 4.7 with the 5 speed we get 19mpg with a vehicle that has a full frame underneath for towing.
Reply
cm 12:41PM (2/05/2009)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the central console of the Tahoe looks as if it came straight out of a Korean car, from the early 90s.
henrykrinkle 12:41PM (2/05/2009)
"I'm probably one of the few people who could afford and need a Tahoe."
Congratulations on your ample wealth and importance!
StickShift 12:50PM (2/05/2009)
Did you take a look at the Ford Expedition? With the independent rear suspension, the packaging aft of the second row is superb - even though I'm 5'10" I rode with reasonable comfort in the third row of a friends.
Dan 12:59PM (2/05/2009)
Yes, IRS makes all the difference for rear packaging.
The midsize Explorer has a more useable 3rd row than a fullsize Tahoe.
G-Meister 3:27PM (2/05/2009)
Chris- with 4 kids, GM has your answer in the Suburban.
Henry- you left some thing out- sounds like..... (crap, nothing rhymes with arrogance)
andy 3:49PM (2/05/2009)
im not so sure about your comment, i don't think these are hard to afford anymore. My 21 y/o brother just purchased a new one and they cut about 20K off the sticker. He only paid about 25K out the door. I think it would be more realistic to say that your one of the few people that are actually in the market for one of these things as opposed to being able to afford it.
Brent 5:53PM (2/05/2009)
HAHA! You couldn't afford the Hemi! You are poor!
Torrent 12:25PM (2/05/2009)
Great review. It's nice to see you guys are still reviewing SUV's. Too bad you guys have a lot of snow. Yesterday I went to the beach. (Cali) T'was a nice 70 degrees.
Reply
sydbot 1:51PM (2/05/2009)
You can't snowboard at the beach though.