Honda Fit dominates Consumer Reports subcompact test

Click on the image above for a high-res gallery of the 2009 Honda Fit Sport
The folks over at Consumer Reports have ranked the Honda Fit Sport top among tested subcompact cars in their March 2009 issue. "We found the new Fit the most practical and enjoyable car in this month's group," says Consumers Union. The world's largest independent consumer product testing organization, who don't claim to be enthusiasts, ran the small Honda against the Suzuki SX4, Nissan Versa, Toyota Yaris, and Chevrolet Aveo.
Compared to the rest of the group, the Honda Fit Sport 5-speed was the quickest to 60 miles-per-hour (an asphalt-melting 9.2 seconds) and sipped the least amount of fuel during testing (a not too shabby 33 miles-per-gallon overall). The CU testers were pleased with the Honda's versatile and flexible interior, but not with its dismal headlights. Of the five, only the Fit and SX4 were recommended. The Yaris and Aveo scored too low in testing to make the cut, and the Renault-based Versa sedan has proven too unreliable. Better luck next year, guys. Official press release after the jump.
Gallery: First Drive: 2009 Honda Fit Sport
[Source: Consumer Reports via PR Newswire]
PRESS RELEASE:
Redesigned Honda Fit Tops Consumer Reports' Ratings of Subcompact Cars
Fit easily outscores competitors including Toyota Yaris, Nissan Versa, Chevrolet Aveo and Suzuki SX4
YONKERS, N.Y., Feb. 2 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The newly-redesigned Honda Fit outpointed competitors including the Toyota Yaris and Nissan Versa in Consumer Reports' tests of six subcompacts and small sedans for the March issue. The Fit remains CR's highest-rated subcompact.
The Honda Fit became a hot-selling vehicle when gasoline prices topped $4 a gallon. A redesigned and slightly larger Fit arrived last fall, and it improves on the space-efficient formula that made the last one such a hit with buyers.
"The Fit seems roomier on the inside than you might expect, with an interior that is unusually versatile and flexible--and cargo capacity rivaling that of a small SUV," said David Champion, senior director of Consumer Reports' Auto Test Center in East Haddam, Connecticut. "Lightness and agility make the Fit fun to drive, the powertrain is smooth and willing, and fuel economy is enviable."
Consumer Reports tested two trim lines of the Fit, a base model with an automatic transmission and a manual upscale Sport model, both of which earned "Very Good" overall road test scores. CR also tested two other subcompacts--a base model Toyota Yaris and a Chevrolet Aveo5, both of which scored "Good" overall, and two small sedans--the Suzuki SX4 and Nissan Versa, both of which were rated Very Good overall.
Prices for the six cars in CR's tests range from $16,020 for the base Fit to $17,378 for the Suzuki SX4.
Full tests and ratings of the test group appear in the March issue of Consumer Reports, which goes on sale February 3. The reports are also available to subscribers of www.ConsumerReports.org.
The Fit and the SX4 are the only vehicles from this month's test group that are Recommended by Consumer Reports. CR only Recommends vehicles that have performed well in its tests, have at least average predicted reliability based on CR's Annual Car Reliability Survey of its more than seven million print and web subscribers, and performed at least adequately if crash-tested or included in a government rollover test.
The Versa sedan's reliability is much below average; reliability for the hatchback Versa has been average. The Aveo and Yaris scored too low in CR's tests to be recommended.
CR's engineers found the new Fit the most practical and enjoyable car in this month's group. It has easy cabin access and a panoramic view out. It also comes well equipped and has comfortable seating. The base Fit ($16,020 Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price as tested) and Fit Sport ($16,730 MSRP as tested) are powered by a 118-hp, 1.5 liter four-cylinder engine that delivers quick takeoffs but doesn't brim with power. The Fit Sport's easy shifting five-speed manual transmission adds sportiness; the five-speed automatic in the base model is more relaxed, with lower engine speed on the highway. Braking was rated Very Good. Fuel economy is an impressive 33 mpg overall in the Fit Sport and 30 mpg overall in the base model with the automatic.
The SX4 LE was conceived as a subcompact, but its price and 26 mpg overall fuel economy makes it compete more closely with cars one size bigger. The SX4 has a stiff, choppy ride on rough and smooth roads. Steering isn't quick or communicative. The SX4 LE ($17,378 MSRP as tested) is equipped with a 143-horsepower, 2.0-liter, four cylinder engine that is mated to a fairly smooth four-speed automatic transmission. Acceleration feels a bit lethargic. Braking performance is very good.
The Versa has a nicely made, well-appointed interior. It rides pleasantly and quietly, and the powertrain feels refined. The rear seat is enormous for a small car. Handling is sound but not really agile, and it's tricky at the limits. Its 27-mpg overall fuel economy is not impressive. The Versa 1.8S ($16,130 MSRP as tested) is powered by a 122-horsepower, 1.8-liter, four-cylinder engine that accelerates adequately; the four-speed automatic is smooth and responsive. Interior storage is modest, but trunk space is quite generous. Braking is very good.
The compactly-sized Yaris is ideal for tight spaces, making it a good city car. Its gets very good fuel economy at 30 mpg overall and has some nice interior touches such as a rear seat that adjusts fore and aft and three glove compartments. Handling is responsive but can be tricky at the limits. The base model Yaris ($16,095 MSRP as tested) is equipped with a 106-horsepower, 1.5-liter, four-cylinder engine that feels lively enough around town but lacks reserve power for the highway. The four-speed automatic shifts smoothly. Braking is excellent.
Despite recent updates, the Aveo remains unpleasant, outdated, and overpriced for what you get. Acceleration is slow, the engine is rough and noisy, handling is clumsy, and the ride is jumpy. Fuel economy at 26 mpg overall is poor for its class, and reliability has been below average. The Aveo51LT ($16,470 MSRP as tested) is powered by an anemic 106-horsepower, 1.6-liter, four-cylinder engine, and the four-speed automatic transmission isn't very responsive. Braking performance is very good.
With more than 7 million print and online subscribers, Consumer Reports is one of the most trusted sources for information and advice on consumer products and services. It conducts the most comprehensive auto-test program of any U.S. publication or Web site; the magazine's auto experts have decades of experience in driving, testing, and reporting on cars. To become a subscriber, consumers can call 1-800-234-1645. Information and articles from the magazine can be accessed online at www.ConsumerReports.org.
MARCH 2009
The material above is intended for legitimate news entities only; it may not be used for commercial or promotional purposes. Consumer Reports(R) is published by Consumers Union, an expert, independent nonprofit organization whose mission is to work for a fair, just, and safe marketplace for all consumers and to empower consumers to protect themselves. To achieve this mission, we test, inform, and protect. To maintain our independence and impartiality, Consumers Union accepts no outside advertising, no free test samples, and has no agenda other than the interests of consumers. Consumers Union supports itself through the sale of our information products and services, individual contributions, and a few noncommercial grants.
SOURCE Consumer Reports












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
AntBee 11:37AM (2/03/2009)
Still can't get a sunroof on 'em, eh?
Reply
Sea Urchin 11:38AM (2/03/2009)
This car is GREAT, but sadly it is priced a tad too high. They need to bring the price down at least by 1K.
Reply
Tang 11:40AM (2/03/2009)
So it is sort of safe to say anyway that the Aveo just sucks, but jeez, looking at the terms CR used, maybe there's a bias?
Reply
Sea Urchin 11:54AM (2/03/2009)
I have YET to read a positive review of Aveo.
Even the politest show on TV, Motor Week said to stay away from the new Aveo. Fit on the other hand gets great reviews everywhere.
You accuse CR of bias, but is that so inconceivable for GM to make a horrendous car……………given they condition?
cdwrx 11:56AM (2/03/2009)
I guess they're biased against cars that do everything badly.
Rocketboy 2:00PM (2/03/2009)
Oh god, I always thought that a car would have to burst into flames and kill someone during the 'review' on Motor Week before the said something bad.
Even then they would still say something like how it's nice to be able to collect on a life insurance policy.
Don 3:07PM (2/03/2009)
lol--It's always a "bias" with CR, isn't it?
Nevermind they have the most thorough testing facilities on God's green earth.
Rocketboy 7:20AM (2/04/2009)
Don.. Mail-in surveys?
CR is great for household goods. Terrible for anything that can't be boiled down to pure numbers.
jac1d 11:46AM (2/03/2009)
I am seriously considering one these, but when I checked, in Canada at least, I could get the base Civic sedan with air for only about $1000 more after taxes, and the Civic is larger with a more powerful engine and great resale.
I am also considering a much older German sedan, possibly a 2000ish 540i or even a nice 740i I've found for similar money (C$12K-C$15K). The fit with air is around $17K-$18K in Canada.
Does anyone know of a good forum for relability and pricing information on used cars? Especially european and japanese cars?
-Jeff
Reply
PeterG 12:03PM (2/03/2009)
I agree if you don't mind a Sedan, the Civic is the better car, bigger, more powerful, and it still gets better highway mileage.
You get the Fit if you really want a hatch.
cdwrx 11:58AM (2/03/2009)
Yes, Consumer Reports.
rsfourever 12:04PM (2/03/2009)
just know that if you buy the 540 or the 740, you are taking great risks as far as paying big bucks for repairs. That is the one defect of german cars - once the warranty period runs out, it's literally cheaper to just go buy a new one so you don't have to deal with repair costs (which can easily go into the $10,000s per year)...
Luis 12:59PM (2/03/2009)
The interior of the Fit is much more versatile than any Sedan's. It's downright cavernous with the rear seats folded flat. No Civic or 540i can match it.
And why compare Civic mpg to Fit mpg and then not hold the 540i to the same standard.
akboss302 1:04PM (2/03/2009)
I'm not the only one! Everybody expects that when I tell them I'm looking for cars and comparing new compacts/subcompacts to older German or Asian super-sedans, they think I'm nuts! Since I've done a lot of looking in this type of segment, the best thing I could suggest is look for something in between - a car that isn't quite as premium as say a 740i, but significantly newer and more reliable, and still much more satisfying to drive than a new Fit. A few off the top? Infiniti G35 (RWD!!!), Nissan Altima 3.5SE, 2004+ Acura 3.2TL or TSX, even a 2004-2006 Caddy CTS with the 3.6 (Also RWD) if you don't mind North American. The older German cars are beautiful and fast, but after you figure out your maintenance and owernship costs, it could be a nightmare. If cost is a factor, price out the insurance before you jump in, it can vary by thousands depending on your choice.
jac1d 1:50PM (2/03/2009)
akboss302:
No, you're the only one.
I'm not hung up on a 7 or even a 5 series, if I go the older, larger sedan route. I'm also intrigued by the older 400E Mercedes, which packs a hell of whallop for around $10K. Yes, repair costs can be bad. Buying older cars of any stripe, especially luxury ones, requires a lot of research about the cars and very thorough inspections. You can still get hit with problems, but if you get a well cared for 1-2 owner car with books and records, and you do the proper required service and maintenance, they can also go for 300-400K KMs quite happily.
As it turns out, I'm going to be working from home, so I just need a car to run about in. Which plays to either argument about what model.
I have been eyeing the 4-5 year old G35 and G35x as well but they are a bit cramped. If I want to buy in that size class a 3 series from 6-7 years would get me in the same place.
I'm less sold on older Acuras, although I did find a lovely black/red NSX for $32K that is very tempting, although impractical with two kids.
The older Altima is a bit of a coin toss, I've heard they don't hold up all that well. I look seriously at a newer SE-R but the reviews were only so-so.
The Caddy is an interesting choice, although I need to see if the older CTS has the fancy direct injection engine or not. I'd happily take a new one in 6 or 8 cylinder version.
Insurance class is also an issue with anything, of course. As I expect to drive half the normal mileage, working from home, I don't want to go over board on insurance. Also, may not get collision if I buy an older luxury sedan.
Any other suggestions out there?
-Jeff
oinky 9:28PM (2/03/2009)
Did you consider a used Acura TSX? These cars run extremely reliably as they are based on European Accords. They also have more power and all the lux options like heated seats, sunroof etc which the Fit does not have. The used prices are great too, not too many people are aware of them, why get a Civic or Fit when you can get a used, fully loaded TSX for about the same price that's a heck more fun to drive.
The wife was considering a Civic until she found out she can get a used TSX for just a bit more, so we are now the happy owners of a 2008 TSX with only 2000 miles on it.
Gas consumption is not bad too, when you compare these to 540i or the Mercedes. Also if anything breaks, the replacement parts are a whole lot cheaper than BMWs and Lexuses.
AntBee 8:19AM (2/04/2009)
Yeah, the Fit is way overpriced in Canada. They want 15K for a base model, on up to 19K for the "sport" model. I put "sport" in quotation marks, because there is nothing sporty about the Fit "sport" save for 15" alloys, a rear spoiler and fog lights.
They want 4K more for little more than cosmetic changes. You'd be better off getting something else for the money. I hate how Canadians are gouged on car prices by all of the manufacturers!!
Alex 11:46AM (2/03/2009)
I can't wait for the Fiesta to hit our shores. I really do believe that Ford will have a segment killer when it gets here.
Reply
MikeInNC 1:01PM (2/03/2009)
Did anyone see the Fiesta review on Top Gear. Absolutely classic!
Chiefstang 1:34PM (2/03/2009)
+1
It's already winning every award they can throw at it in Europe. Even Clarkson loves it!