Review: 2009 Dodge Charger SXT 3.5

2009 Dodge Charger SX 3.5 – Click above for high-res image gallery
It's been almost a year since a Dodge Charger passed through the Autoblog Garage, and this go-around was very different from the last. Comparedto our last Charger, this one is positively subtle. Last time around, we sampled one of Dodge's police car demonstrators decked out in full law enforcement regalia including a roof-top light bar and traditional black-and-white paint job. Driving the cop Charger was a mix of euphoria and paranoia. This time, Chrysler sent over a civilian SXT model powered by the company's 3.5-liter V6.
While the name hearkens back to coupes of the '60s and '70s (we'll ignore the forgettable badge job Omni edition of the '80s, thank you very much!) this is a full-sized sedan in the great American tradition. Given the current economic environment, future fuel economy regulations and the likely trajectory of gas prices, this is also a tradition that may be on its last legs. Read on after the jump to find out if this is a tradition worth preserving.
Gallery: Review: 2009 Dodge Charger SXT 3.5
Photos Copyright ©2009 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.
While the Charger's looks are all-American, some of the underpinnings actually descend from the previous generation Mercedes-Benz E-Class. The Charger and its LX platform stablemates – the late Magnum, the Chrysler 300 and, of course, the Challenger – were developed under the management of former owner Daimler. This is one of two platforms with which the Germans begrudgingly agreed to share their hardware, the other being the ill-fated Crossfire. Fortunately for Chrysler, the LX was and is far more successful. The LX architecture actually underpins one of Chrysler's truly distinct products in the U.S. market, and in spite of using older German bits underneath, the Charger remains a relatively modern piece of kit.

The primary bits that came from Germany are those that manage the motion of the wheels relative to the body. The all-independent suspension demonstrated that a rear-wheel-drive car could still be viable in the 21st century and likely prodded General Motors to develop its own rear-wheel-drive Zeta platform. Unfortunately for GM, by the time the Zeta arrived for the Pontiac G8 and Chevrolet Camaro, the market was already turning and Ford's own similar effort had been canceled before even yielding a product.




The Charger became the third LX model following the 300 and Magnum when it debuted in early 2005. In 1999, Chrysler showed off a rear-drive Charger R/T concept that previewed the coming wave of four-door coupe body styles that we've seen in recent years. Unfortunately, many observers who had seen the sleek concept were disappointed that its looks had been abandoned in favor of a chunkier design that shared the front part of its greenhouse with its platform mates. The look has grown on people over the years and remains fairly unique in the marketplace. At least no one can claim that Chrysler's designers have cloned any other car to produce the Charger.

For the first several years of the LX's run, the interiors unfortunately lived up to the reputation that Chrysler had earned for shoddy driving environments. The problem wasn't so much the design and control layout, which was straightforward and functional, just the materials, switchgear quality, and fit-and-finish. For the 2008 model year, Chrysler produced a vastly improved interior for the Charger and its siblings. The materials on the dashboard are now soft touch with a more appealing texture. There are no more visible edges with unfinished parting lines from the molds. We're still not talking Lexus or Infiniti here, but this is a Dodge at a Dodge price point. In fact, the Charger's closest real competition is probably the Pontiac G8, and by comparison, the Charger interior actually looks and feels pretty good.


The seats in our SXT tester were covered in leather front and rear and clearly contoured for the increasingly broad average American backside. Following a relatively straight trajectory, the front seats were comfortable with a manually adjustable lumbar support and power adjustments for angles of both the seat back and lower cushion as well as fore-aft location. For those whose proportions of leg-to-arm length might not match whatever standard size the interior designers selected, there is also switch on the side of the driver's seat that allows the entire pedal cluster to be adjusted for distance from the seat.

The leather on the seats is smooth and relatively stiff, but won't ever be confused with vinyl. Unfortunately, the smooth finish, broad dimensions and minimal side bolsters mean that a SXT driver will have to brace themself if they intend to do any comparatively aggressive cornering. The Charger's long 120-inch wheelbase means that back seat passengers have ample leg room and can stretch out in comfort. The only downside is that the sloping roofline may cut into some occupants head room compared to a 300. Six footers should have no problem back there. There is one other downside to the Charger's roofline. The relatively upright windshield means the leading edge of the roof extends forward quite a bit. If you are at an intersection where the stoplights hang over the center, you may need to lean forward to see them.


Unlike the HEMI-equipped cop car that we drove last year, this SXT was powered by the increasingly long-in-the-tooth 3.5-liter V6. From a power standpoint, the engine is reasonably class competitive with 250 horsepower and 250 lb-ft of torque at an acceptable 3,800 rpm. The Charger is certainly no flyweight at 3,783 pounds, but the 3.5L provided perfectly adequate acceleration. You won't be drag racing an SRT-8, but 0-60 miles-per-hour in the mid-7s should be more than enough in day-to-day driving. Where the 3.5L is somewhat lacking is in refinement. The balanced 60-degree block means smooth operation, but the engine is a bit noisy when working hard. The V6 only comes paired with a four-speed automatic transmission, so the engine often revs higher and has a more pronounced drop between gears than you will experience with other cars that have 5-,6- or 7-speed units. Having said that, the powertrain is fully acceptable when driven sedately.
The LX's double wishbone front and multi-link rear suspensions have always been very capable. This test unit was equipped with a preferred option package that included a touring suspension setup, which provided a very nice balance of ride and control. Unlike a V6 Challenger we drove a few months ago that felt decidedly soft, this Charger felt tied down with excellent damping that never felt floaty. The only real complaint would be the no-feedback steering. There is just the right amount of resistance when turning the steering wheel so that it doesn't feel light, but the weighting seems entirely relative to the steering angle and not the cornering force. At least there is no dead spot in the center; turning the wheel brings an immediate change of direction.

The Charger came to the Autoblog Garage at the end of the week following the Detroit Auto Show previews, which also happened to coincide with some extremely cold sub-zero temperatures and still more snow. On a trek from my Ypsilanti home to Detroit for Hyundai's annual post show pool, bowling and live music decompression session, the electric stability control got a thorough workout on I-94. While many other drivers found themselves stranded in the ditch along the route, the Charger felt in control even on its 18-inch Continental all-season tires and despite its rear-wheel-drive setup. For those who like to have a little fun with their winter time driving, the ESC is actually quite cooperative. Rather than the totally nailed down, over-aggressive control that some systems provide, the Charger actually lets the rear end slide out just a bit around corners before gently nudging it back without ever jerking the chassis around.


The navigation system in the Charger was also equipped with SIRIUS traffic information, which came in handy during our mid-snow-storm run to Detroit. With so many cars off the road, the system automatically re-routed us along surface streets for a while before sending us back to the freeway.
For those so-inclined, Chrysler also offers an all-wheel-drive option, but we would suggest just buying a second set of wheels with snow-tires instead if you live somewhere with nastier winters. That, combined with the electronic stability control, will probably nearly match the traction capabilities of the AWD without the somewhat ungainly looking extra inch of ride height.

Those cold temperatures did take their toll on fuel economy. We achieved about 18 mpg with a mix of city and highway snow driving while the EPA rates the 3.5L SXT at 17 mpg city and 25 mpg highway. The Charger SXT has an entry price point of $26,150 but our tester had a healthy options list that drove the bottom line, including delivery, to a more substantial $32,335. It's not inexpensive, but for a large rear-drive sedan with capable dynamics and a uniquely American look, it's worth considering. Chrysler has promised a redesigned 300 and Charger for 2011 that the few who have seen say looks gorgeous. If Chrysler is still with us in 2011, it may well have this segment back to itself again. The Charger actually gives some reason to hope they do make it.
Gallery: Review: 2009 Dodge Charger SXT 3.5
Photos Copyright ©2009 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.








Get a WordPress.com Blog




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Sofa King Fast! 12:05PM (1/26/2009)
The "coupes of the '60s and '70s" are rolling over in their grave at this shameless abuse of brand equity.
This car is the reason Chrysler can't stand on its own feet. This product is not competitive with either the full size or mid-size offerings from competitors and survivies only where buying american trumps buying quality.
Reply
John 12:11PM (1/26/2009)
I'd have to disagree, the Charger is a great car. It's reliable, very comfortable car that for its size, gets good gas mileage. Plus, while the MSRP of their tester may have been $32,000, you can buy it for $25,000 or so, making it a great deal as well.
Dodge sells a very healthy number of these cars and everyone I know who owns one is very satisfied with it. I personally cannot wait for the next generation of LX vehicles, I have seen them and they are gorgeous.
Rob 1:00PM (1/26/2009)
I agree. My first car was a 68 Charger, and this thing is a piece of crap. Four doors? Seats for fat people? And a 4spd automatic? Ugh. The faster ones are okay, but way way way way WAY overpriced.
MemphisNET 12:41PM (1/26/2009)
The cars are fantastic at a good price point. When these cars were introduced, you'd be hard pressed to get a 3.5 V6 for under 36k CND, Hemi's starting at 44k. With near-parity in pricing, and all vendors south of the border raising prices, I think you guys in the good old U S of A are just not used to the sticker shock yet.
Having said that, incentives usually drive the price down. But I do agree with the above statement that the sticker ''price'' may scare some away.
Tom 3:29PM (1/26/2009)
Oh yes, because they didn't roll over when the Charger name was plastered to a FWD Four Banger made in Japan. I can't believe that after all these years people still hate the Charger's four doors, even though it's still a RWD HEMI powered Muscle Sedan. I guess if you don't like it, don't buy it, but stop complaining about something so irrelevant.
Brad 4:32PM (1/26/2009)
@Tom
Challenger was the name that was put on the 4 banger from Japan. It was the Dodge version of the Plymouth Sapporo.
Charger was put on the sportier version of the Omni 2dr (024).
jp 12:13PM (1/26/2009)
The charger is one of the worst cars EVER made. I needed a rental and they gave me one of these... after 1 day I went back and demanded a different car. I can't express in words how horrible the Charger is.. I'm surprised you guys spent time writing up a review of it.
Reply
caddy-v 12:31PM (1/26/2009)
I've rented several of them and I have to trump your opinion. I think they're pretty good cars. Far better than the Camry's and Hyundai's flooding the airports now.
MemphisNET 12:44PM (1/26/2009)
I could never use a rental as a point of reference. They're not the most well cared for vehicles.
Before I purchased the Magnum, I rented on that had just been purchased by an Avis Rental center. A 20-30min test drive never really gives you a clear impression, so the fee for a week long rental was well worth it for me.
MemphisNET 12:57PM (1/26/2009)
To expand on this and avoid confusion, a friend ran the agency, and the car had less than 100km on it when it arrived. Thus it had not yet been abused. :D
Randy 12:05AM (1/27/2009)
I own a 2006 Charger R/T with 61K
Outside of brake pads, oil, cleaning my air filter and new tires I had one factory issue with the car. I also bought it used with 20K on it and it had been raced! So I think it's holding up very well! I just hat sat radio installed too because I'm keeping it! I love this car! I'm thinking about buying another one in two year and keeping both!
And I'm a Ford guy! Though, I do agree the Crown Vic is a better car! The styling on the Charger is awesome! Actually my car and the one in the pics look almost identical! I have dual exhaust though.. whatever right? lol
Dan 12:14PM (1/26/2009)
That 3.5 V6 came with a 5 speed for the first two years. For the first year, that was the base powertrain even in the strippers stickering $22K.
Now the base engine is the throughly overmatched 2.7 V6 / 4 speed, and the 3.5 starts at $27K MSRP.
Reply
mapoftazifosho 12:29PM (1/26/2009)
The biggest problem with the American companies is their MSRP. They over inflate it and then throw tons of incentives at it...so the consumer sees the $32k sticker price and just walks away...
They need to get off this kick...
Reply
jps 12:40PM (1/26/2009)
@ caddy-v
are you kidding me? Give me a Camry or Altima rental ANY day. Hell.. give me ANY japanese car over that American POS. The Charger is a good example of why American automakers are in such shambles. It really is one of the worst cars ever made. It is GIANT, gets horrible gas mileage, has a weak engine for the horrible gas mileage it gets, is uncomfortable, feels like a giant boat, has horrible steering input... i could go on and on. I hated every second driving that car. There isn't one good quality about it.
Reply
Jim 1:44PM (1/26/2009)
We get it. you don't like the Charger. You think it's the worst car ever made.
Noted.
By the way, you know that thing you like? It SUCKS.
Jim 1:47PM (1/26/2009)
"The Charger is a good example of why American automakers are in such shambles."
O RLY? Then why did the 300 and Charger sell so well?
JF 1:51PM (1/26/2009)
"It is GIANT, gets horrible gas mileage, has a weak engine for the horrible gas mileage it gets, is uncomfortable, feels like a giant boat, has horrible steering input"
Being GIANT isn't a bad point in itself, as some people like having a large spacious car. I'm disputing your point on fuel mileage, the 375 hp, 400 lb-ft R/T gets 16/25 on the EPA cycle, so please name ANY large car with more power and torque that gets that kind of mpg. You can't because there are NONE, the G8 GT and Genesis are the only ones that come close. Uncomfortable is subjective, feels like a giant boat can mean that it has a smooth ride, and horrible steering input is subjective.
Bottom line: don't base your opinions on a beat-to-hell base model rental, and please be more objective.
Other Man 3:29PM (1/26/2009)
I understand anyone who dislikes the Charger, and it's far from perfect.
But anyone who says it's a piece of garbage is simply stupid and biased.
Slizzo 3:20PM (1/26/2009)
@JF
The Charger really does handle like a boat, it's one of the worst performers of any rear-drive platformed car.
And as for the R/T package, yes, it gets OK mileage. My G8 GT is rated for 15/24MPG but is much roomier on the interior, handles better, weighs much less, and accelerates/brakes much better.
Not only that, but my G8 GT w/ leather, dual-zone climate control, 6 disc in dash CD changer, 11 speaker sound system, heated power seats cost more than $1000 less than this Autoblog tester...
Oh, and I consistently get better than 25MPG highway.
Other Man 4:12PM (1/26/2009)
@ Slizzo:
My father has a Charger R/T, a 2008. He gets over 25 mpg on the highway easily as well. I find the interior more pleasing than the G8 thanks to the extra equipment available. It's not a sports sedan in the hills like the G8 (although the optional Road/Track Perf Group comes closer), but it doesn't embarass itself the way you're saying. It's much quieter and more comfortable in its ride. I prefer its sound and style as well, and it comes very well equipped for the base 31.5 grand. The G8 V-6 can be optioned into G8 GT and R/T territory just as the SXT can as well.
So I prefer the Charger, nice as the G8 is, but they're different cars really.