2010 Toyota Corolla, Matrix get standard stability and traction control
It's not every day that you get more for the same money. Yet that's what Toyota is offering with the 2010 Corolla, which will come with traction control and vehicle stability control and no price increase over the outgoing model. The MSRP of that car remains $15,350 for the base model 5-speed sedan. The Matrix also adds the two features as standard, but the price on the CUV goes up by $201, to $21,960. Both cars will arrive in dealer showrooms at the end of February, and for more pricing info you can check out the press release after the jump.[Source: Toyota]
PRESS RELEASE
Vehicle Stability Control and Traction Control Now Standard Equipment in 2010 Toyota Corolla and Matrix
- Toyota Announces Prices for Both Vehicles -
TORRANCE, Calif., Jan. 23 /PRNewswire/ -- Toyota Motor Sales (TMS), U.S.A., Inc., announced manufacturer's suggested retail price (MSRP) today for the 2010 high mileage Corolla compact sedan and Matrix crossover utility vehicle, which now include Vehicle Stability Control (VSC) and Traction Control (TRAC) as standard equipment.
There is no price increase for the 2010 Corolla. Corolla's base MSRP will range from $15,350 for the standard sedan with a five-speed transmission to $20,050 for the sporty XRS with a five-speed automatic transmission.
Matrix carries a base MSRP that will range from $16,550 for the standard sedan with a five-speed transmission to $21,960 for the sporty XRS with a five-speed automatic transmission. The new Matrix MSRP represents an overall increase of $201 or 1.1 percent.
The new prices will take effect when the 2010 Corolla and Matrix arrive in dealer showrooms beginning in late February. MSRPs do not include a delivery, processing, and handling (DPH) fee of $720. DPH fee for vehicles distributed by Southeast Toyota (SET) and Gulf States Toyota (GST) may vary.
Both models bring a fun-to-drive experience with impressive fuel economy. The Corolla's 1.8-liter DOHC four-cylinder engine with dual variable valve timing with intelligence (VVT-i), featured on Standard, LE and XLE models, has estimated EPA fuel economy ratings of 26 mpg city/34 mpg highway. The Corolla XRS' 2.4-liter DOHC engine with VVT-i has estimated EPA ratings of 22/30.
The Matrix Standard is also powered by the 1.8-liter DOHC four-cylinder engine with dual VVT-i and has EPA mpg estimates of 26/32 for the manual transmission, while the four-speed automatic has ratings of 25/31. The 2.4-liter engine, also shared with the Matrix S and XRS, has EPA mpg estimates of 21/28 for manual, 21/29 for the five-speed automatic and 20/26 for the AWD.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Majarvis 11:13AM (1/24/2009)
Damn, no 2.5L for the XRS models that replaces the Camry's 2.4L (which is the same 2.4L that is in the Corolla and Matrix XRS).
Reply
Mazda FTW! 11:13AM (1/24/2009)
The Matrix is not a 'CUV' is it?
Reply
carcomptoy 12:21PM (1/24/2009)
I didn't think it was either. Aren't CUVs wannabe-SUVs on car platforms? The Matrix is just to be the 5-door hatchback version of the Corolla, no?
Esemtee 11:34PM (1/24/2009)
When my wife and I bought her Matrix in 2003, it was referred to as a CUV back then - Compact Utility Vehicle. Sure, it's a 5-door Corolla, but when the rear seats fold flat you get a LOT of room! We have impressed many people with what we've carried back there!
firstplace 11:20AM (1/24/2009)
not surprised, soon all vehicles will have mandatory stability control.... this is a moot point.
Reply
zamafir 11:35AM (1/24/2009)
Yup, considering companies like VW have made features like this standard for years, it's nice to see Toyota catching up.
Ryan 1:52PM (1/24/2009)
@ zamafir ("Yup, considering companies like VW have made features like this standard for years, it's nice to see Toyota catching up.")
I don't see how it's an issue of catching up. The closest VW competitor to the Corolla has been the Jetta, and it has been historically priced a few thousand dollars higher than the Corolla. The fact that Corolla is offering TC and SC at its lower price point is an important difference.
mapoftazifosho 11:21AM (1/24/2009)
I believe for 2008 Chevy Cobalts were given Stabilitrak and traction control at no extra cost...
What took Toyota so long?
Reply
Vig 3:11PM (1/24/2009)
Hey, what are you doing?
Don't you know that in this comment section you're supposed to be blindly critical of anything an American company does and absolutely supportive of the Japanese automakers?
I mean, Toyota was wise not to introduce valuable safety options onto their vehicles for a whole two years. That's why their business models are so much better than those foolish Americans.
Well, that and the fact their government recognizes the industry's inherent value and doesn't try to embarrass them with outdated stereotypes and turn their plight into a campaign issue during tough times.
Jon 4:41PM (1/24/2009)
I would get one if it did, I'm pretty sure you can only get it on the SS model (well, at least according to the Chevy website)
Jon 1:43AM (1/25/2009)
After a little googling, looks like it was offered on other trims in 08, but is only available on the TurboSS model in 09
so let's not trip over ourselves patting the American company in the back, who for some reason moved backwards in this regard...
P.V. 11:36AM (1/24/2009)
I don't care that the Civic only gets SC/TC on the EX-L model, that would still be my top compact car choice any day (especially over the Corolla).
Reply
Seminole 1:13PM (1/24/2009)
I do. There is no reason it can't be offered on the lower models too. I frankly am not going to spend around $22,000 MSRP for a Civic with leather. If I'm getting a Civic it is not going to have leather in it, no need to. And for that kind of money I would just get a Si. Stupid move on Honda's part.
firstplace 1:53PM (1/24/2009)
Have to agree with you, any car with abs would just need 2 extra sensors and minor software change for abs system. It would probably cost them $10 per car if any manufacturer made there entire line up like this. Soon they will be required to anyway.
Jon 10:33PM (1/24/2009)
Completely agree with Seminole, these games they play with options is a big turnoff for me and is why I haven't bought a Honda. I hate leather seats, why should I be required to get leather seats to get stability control? Meanwhile on the Fit, you need a NAV. The Civic just went through a new 'refresh' and the Fit is new for this year, come on now...and they still do that stupid thing where certain features are only available on the coupe compared to a sedan, just annoys the hell out of me
gerrrg 11:42AM (1/24/2009)
Since 2007 when the second gen xB was introduced, you could get both the 2.4L engine with stability control for less than $18,000 (all inclusive).
Reply
Joe K. 12:46AM (1/25/2009)
The Vibe (while sharing the platform and engine, and basically everything) has stabilitrak and such standard, while also having XM standard, all for less money than the Matrix. How much does an logo cost too stick on the nose, rear and steering wheel?
dcaswell16v 12:01PM (1/24/2009)
How exciting!!!!!!! Tell me they added an new silver to their colors too......
Reply
Cire 12:06PM (1/24/2009)
I guess the 2010 Pontiac Vibe will follow suit and will arrive on the market shortly after the Toyota products. I am a little more excited about the Vibe (which means I am only slightly more excited about it as compared to the zero excitement I am experiencing about the hideous Toyota products) since it is by far the best looking of the three platform mates. I saw a 2009 Matrix out on the road yesterday (which was the first time I saw one that wasn't sitting on a dealer lot); it is truly a strikingly deformed mess of a design. I must admit that I see 2009 Corollas out and about quite frequently; seeing them quite often hasn't made me appreciate their horrible appearance though.
Reply
Casey 1:25PM (1/24/2009)
The 2009 Vibe already has StabiliTrak as a standard feature on all trim levels. The Vibe cost less and has a better warranty. Seems like a simple choice to me