Porsche unveils its latest GT3 RSR

Click above for a hi-res gallery of the 2009 Porsche GT3 RSR
Porsche has unveiled the latest iteration of its GT2-class racing car, the GT3 RSR. Visually, the biggest difference for '09 is up front, where a substantially louvered hood now resides. It's there because the car's radiator ductwork has been redesigned so as to accommodate the racer's optional A/C system. Other changes are hidden, but no less important. Aero tweaks include a rear wing angle that's more adjustable than on last year's car. The brakes and wiring harness contribute to lighter weight, and inside the pilot gets a new multifunction display. There's also a revised supply system that allows for an infinitely adjustable blink rate for the front lights. That makes for easy nighttime identification when the car pits. The oil filler has been relocated for easier access, and the GT3 RSR is equipped with a new air jack, as well.
That's all well and good, but what about the power? Displacement for the rear-mounted six-cylinder jumps from 3.8 to 4.0 liters, and it now pumps out 450 horsepower at 7,800 rpm. (Last year it produced 465 hp @ 8,000 rpm) Torque is rated at 317 lb-ft (430 Nm) at 7,250 rpm – the same as last year. The rev limiter kicks in at 9K, and Porsche says that the new car's torque curve is better-optimized than the outgoing car's. The new RSR ought to become a common sight in the Le Mans series on both sides of the Atlantic, as Porsche resumes its annual battle with Ferrari in sports car racing. Want one? Give Porsche €380,000 – roughly $494,000 USD (plus the appropriate VAT) and you're good to go. Tech specs are pasted after the jump.
Gallery: 2009 Porsche GT3 RSR
[Source: Porsche]
Technical Description Porsche GT3 RSR (2009)
Engine:
Water-cooled, six-cylinder boxer engine; four valves
per cylinder; dry sump lubrication; individual throttle
butterflies; fuel injection; air restrictors 2 x 29.5 mm.
Bore:
102.7 mm
Stroke:
80.4 mm
Capacity:
3,996 cc
Power output:
331 kW (450 bhp) at 7,800 rpm
Max. Torque:
430 Nm at 7,250 rpm
Max. revs:
9,400 rpm
Transmission:
Six-speed gearbox with sequential jaw-type shift;
oil/water heat exchanger; single-mass flywheel;
hydraulic disengagement lever; three-plate carbon-fibre
clutch; rear wheel drive; limited-slip differential 45/65%.
Body:
Monocoque body (basis GT3 RS) of hot-galvanised steel;
aerodynamically optimised front end with front spoiler;
aerodynamically optimised front underfloor; adjustable
rear wing; 90-litre safety fuel tank with fast filling function;
air jack; welded-in safety cage; bucket-type racing seat
(on driver's side only) with flame-resistant seat cover;
six-point seat belt adapted for use of the HANS
Head and Neck Support; electric fire-extinguishing system.
Suspension:
Front:
McPherson spring strut axle; Sachs four-way gas
pressure dampers; double coil springs (main and ancillary
spring); front axle arms adjustable for camber; adjustable
sword-type anti-roll bar on both sides; power steering.
Rear:
Multi-arm axle with rigidly mounted axle sub-frame;
Sachs four-way gas pressure dampers; double coil springs
(main and auxiliary spring); rear axle tie-bar reinforced
and infinitely adjustable; adjustable sword-type anti-roll
bar on both sides.
Complete suspension infinitely adjustable (height,
camber, track).
Brakes:
Brake system with balance bar control.
Front:
Single-piece six-piston aluminium fixed callipers;
inner-vented, 380 mm in diameter; racing brake pads.
Rear: Single-piece four-piston aluminium fixed callipers;
inner-vented, 355 mm in diameter; racing brake pads.
Wheels:
Front:
Three-piece BBS light-alloy wheels (11J x 18-34);
central bolt;
Rear:
Three-piece BBS light-alloy wheels (13J x 18-12.5);
central bolt.
Electrical System:
Motec display with integrated data recording; multi-function
display with integrated gearshift indicator; adjustable
traction control; battery: 12 volt, 50 Ah, 140 Ah alternator.
Weight:
Approx. 1,220 kg complying with A.C.O. regulations,
1,245 kg complying with FIA regulations.






Get a WordPress.com Blog




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
TurboPanzer 1:48PM (1/22/2009)
The RSR just keeps getting better.
This year's ALMS and LMS should be interesting.
Reply
JDMlover 3:03PM (1/22/2009)
Sweet.
Reply
superman211 4:58PM (1/22/2009)
That's what I was just going to say! And it is! VERY TIGHT AND SWEET!
John Johnson 3:13PM (1/22/2009)
Holy balls, that looks hot.
Reply
Stuka 3:14PM (1/22/2009)
I love the "Drink" button on the steering wheel :)
Reply
Cypher09 3:18PM (1/22/2009)
That's one sexy rear end.
Reply
Serge K. 3:19PM (1/22/2009)
I don't understand the reason for "more displacement, less power" situation. Anybody know?
Reply
TurboPanzer 3:37PM (1/22/2009)
The power output is regulated by air restrictors. So Porsche elected to up the displacement to 4L (same as the Ferrari now), mainly to get a much flatter torque curve at lower rpms, sacrificing just a bit of top-end power. The fatter torque curve aids the exit of corners, lessen the needs to downshift and gain more corner exit speed.
This also lowers the peak rpm needed for maximum power, hence increasing reliability and decreasing stress the engine must endure especially during endurance races like Le Mans or Sebring.
nastinupe 3:38PM (1/22/2009)
I haven;t looked at the old and new power figures, however, since the displacement has gone up, I'm sure that this car has more torque which helps with down low power, which is always useful when exiting curves. Sometimes, the extra torque can be as important, if not more important than the horsepower. In this case, I believe that the acceleration up high will remain about the same, and down low it will increase from the extra displacement.
hashiryu 3:46PM (1/22/2009)
I was wondering if that was a typo....
Craig 4:00PM (1/22/2009)
The 08 had the same restrictors. I thunk what you are seeing is Porsche being sneaky, the last thing they want is the rules makers slapping additional weight on them.
If you notice the power figure given isn't quoted as max output just output at that rpm. On the 08 the specs quote max power at 8000rpm, given that this new engine has the same 9400 rpm redline you can be sure its more powerful.
TurboPanzer 4:15PM (1/22/2009)
@Craig
Nothing sneaky at all, and you're reading too much into it.
Having a higher redline doesn't mean there's more power above the 8000rpm peak horsepower rev range.
This is a high-strung motor, and if you ever saw the horsepower/torque curve dyno-graph of such an engine, you'll see that once it hits peak horsepower at around 8000rpm, the horsepower will drop from then on until redline.
The whole point of having a higher redline is to accommodate the gear ratios, so that when you upshift at redline, you'll still fall into the torquey part of the rev range for the next gear.
B 4:44PM (1/22/2009)
Its about optimizing the shape of the torque curve to make the car more drivable.
Its like a a turbo supra, the car makes no power until it is at boost, and then its such violent power delivery its hard to drive. But if a car can apply power in a linear manner, the tires will still stick, and it can operate anywhere in the rev range.
Craig 6:25PM (1/22/2009)
@Turbo
I'm aware of power curves, area under the curve and all that good stuff.
My reference to the redline was to indicate that even though the engine is larger and still wears the same restrictors as the outgoing model it is still able to reach the same redline. With the same restictors if it could only rev to say 9000 you would think it wouldn't make more power than the outgoing model, since it matches the 08 I stand by my belief that it makes more.
When the only difference between two otherwise identical engines is size, the larger one will make more power at any given rpm.
TurboPanzer 6:50PM (1/22/2009)
@Craig
I believe you got them mixed up. If given the same sized air restrictors for both the 3.8L and the 4L engines, the one with the larger displacement will make less power relative to the smaller displacement engine.
Just as a reference, the Ferrari F430 (Porsche's main rival) also has a 4L engine. So it's fair game at the end of the day (in terms of air restrictor size versus engine displacement).
Kiiks 7:23PM (1/22/2009)
I thought they already had 4.0L last year? That's what the Lizard guy was saying...
TurboPanzer 7:42PM (1/22/2009)
@Kiiks
You're correct. I believe they had the 4L engine during mid-season. So this year the engine is carried over, but probably with improved tuning for better torque characteristic and fuel consumption.
Stumpy 3:19PM (1/22/2009)
I want one for my daily commute. No more tardies (is that a word?) for me!
Reply
Evotec 3:22PM (1/22/2009)
€380,000 WTF?
Reply
Cypher09 3:33PM (1/22/2009)
It's a race car, what were you expecting? 3 year/30,000 mile warranty & road side assistance?