Performance Test: 2008 Toyota Tundra TRD
We don't do much performance testing of the vehicles we review here at Autoblog, partly because we don't have the resources and also because our seat-of-the-pants-meter usually gives us the pertinent information we need about how a car (or truck, in this case) performs. There are times, however, that we do get the urge to get real, actual numbers. Take, for instance, this 2008 Toyota Tundra TRD. Last month, Motor Trend put it to the test and claimed it could muscle its way from 0 to 60 mph in just 4.4 seconds. While we have no doubt that this time could theoretically be achieved assuming unlimited amounts of traction, we called shenanigans and vowed to get our hands on the truck to record our own numbers. Fortunately, Toyota was game and provided the same exact Tundra TRD used in Motor Trend's test with a fresh set of rear tires. We're not here to debate the point of a performance truck or argue with those who think vehicles like this are the cause of global warming. We just want to see what it'll really run. So along with our pal Mike Levine of PickupTrucks.com, we set out to play drag racer for a day and find out. Read on to see the results.
Photos copyright ©2008 Drew Phillips / Weblogs, Inc.
The Goods
First thing's first. What's the deal with the Tundra TRD? While you won't find one listed for sale on Toyota's website, you can actually order a Tundra with most of the TRD parts from the factory and have the remaining bits installed through a dealer. All TRD parts are covered by a factory warranty, meaning you can have your aftermarket fun and not have to worry about a dealership denying warranty claims.



Our tester came fully accessorized with the high performance brake kit, cat-back dual exhaust, 22-inch forged wheels wrapped with Toyo Proxes S/T tires, and a beefier rear anti-roll bar. Oh yeah, and a supercharger. The Eaton Roots-style blower pushes 8.5 pounds of boost into the 5.7L V8, yielding 504 horsepower and a tire-shredding 550 lb-ft torque. Along with the supercharger, the kit comes from TRD complete with a new intake with a reusable filter, high-flow fuel injectors and fuel pump, intercooler, Denso Iridium spark plugs, a retune of the ECU, and all necessary plumbing and hardware. Did we mention it comes with a factory warranty?



The Venue
With keys in hand, we made a beeline for Irwindale Speedway, or "Toyota Speedway at Irwindale" to be more precise. Southern California's most popular 1/8th mile drag strip is coincidentally sponsored by Toyota, and some well-placed signs at the track made for some unexpectedly great photo opportunities.

Whether it was the name on the back of our truck or just the politeness of our phone call, we were allowed free reign at the strip a half hour before their Thursday evening test-and-tune opened to the public. The track was very well prepped and the sticky pavement was a better launching surface then we'd ever find on the street. Our thanks go out to Bob Klein, the track's director of operations who helped make things happen.
The Results
While the facilities at the track included timing equipment for the 1/8th mile, we were mostly interested in the 0-60 mph time. To record our data, we used a Passport G-Timer GT2 from Escort that provided us with consistent data over several runs. We made a total of eight passes with Levine behind the wheel, and as you might expect, we initially had trouble finding the best way to get the tires to hook up.



The first run involved plenty of rubbery smoke and hitting the rev limiter, as the tires feebly attempted to transmit torque to pavement. With 7.50 seconds showing on the display, we headed back to the starting line for another attempt using lower rpm's at launch. The second pass went much better, although still with plenty of spinning tires, yielding a time of 5.55 seconds. After letting some air out of the tires and fine tuning the launch to include a short rollout to maximize traction, we slowly worked the times down – 5.45, 5.32, and finally a 5.20. We believe the Tundra TRD had at least another tenth or two in it, but a line of 50 drag racers were anxiously waiting in line behind us and our time was up.

So can the Tundra TRD hit 60 mph in 4.4 seconds like Motor Trend says? Providing for altitude, temperature, and humidity adjustments and a John Force perfect launch... we doubt it. The supercharged V8 has sufficient horsepower and enough torque, but traction is most definitely the limiting factor. If we were to perform the test again we'd bring a tire pressure gauge and weights to stuff in the bed, but we still don't think we'd break into the fours. So yes, the Toyota Tundra TRD will lose a drag race to any of the world's modern day supercars, but our seat-of-the-pants-meter says it's still one hell of a fast truck.
If you liked this story, click over to PickupTrucks.com for Mike Levine's account.
Photos copyright ©2008 Drew Phillips / Weblogs, Inc.








Get a WordPress.com Blog




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Bigfork 12:21PM (12/30/2008)
This comment is my entry into the 2008 Autoblog Holiday Sweepstakes - Day 14 ;)
Reply
ack154 12:45PM (12/30/2008)
WTH?
Badass truck though. I'd take one in a heartbeat if I had the $$.
AMcA 7:15PM (12/30/2008)
TRD.
Fill in a vowel to make a word. I think that says it all.
Mobius_1 7:51PM (12/30/2008)
TROD? That makes no sense. :P
Matt 12:26PM (12/30/2008)
So you're saying you applied rollout to your fastest numbers? Typically that gives you about 0.3-0.5 seconds off the "real" time, and is generally why MT records the 'fastest' numbers among other magazines [and why Edmunds usually is the 'slowest' (read: the most accurate)] - because MT's 0-60mph times are actually about 4mph-to-60. It's a BS way of calculating 0-60 times.
Reply
BLS 12:34PM (12/30/2008)
My thoughts exactly. Although it probably won't get them down to 4.4 still.
hashiryu 12:44PM (12/30/2008)
Agreed about the motortrend thing, but Edmunds ....... the generally just CAN'T DRIVE.
Sandeep 12:51PM (12/30/2008)
No, that would be Consumer Reports that can't drive. Edmunds at least has been providing 0-60 with and without rollout on their longterm tests. It's actually a pretty decent blog, if you've never seen it before: blogs.edmunds.com/roadtests
No, I don't work for Edmunds, that's not my site, and I am not a communist/socialist/-ist-that-you-don't-like, so don't flame me.
Matt 12:52PM (12/30/2008)
hashiryu,
Right, which is why they get more hits on any of their videos than any magazines' annual subscription count, and why they get to test new cars and trucks before the magazines now. Times have changed, and it appears they didn't like whatever vehicle you drive because your negativity just reeks of bias.
tekd 3:01PM (12/30/2008)
I think the real problem is that they used a Passport G-Timer, and calibration and affect the results by quite a bit. Unless they calibrated and compared it to a track time and kept adjusting until they matched there's no way of knowing how accurate the results are.
Not that it really matters whether a pickup truck goes 0-60 in 5 seconds or 4.4, lol.
hashiryu 5:15PM (12/30/2008)
I know their site, I have insideline in my bookmarks and I know a lot of people that reference it. Doesn't change the fact that they are ALWAYS slower than what is achieved in the real world.
Matt 2:32AM (12/31/2008)
Again, that makes no sense, since rollout and a drag strip are certainly not "real world." And even if they were, this article proves that MT's times are BS. Do yourself a favor and read this article, or watch the video, or both, before you spew any more negativity. http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=130988
Looking at your previous comments in other posts leaves me unimpressed, by the way. They're mostly snarky side comments and are of little worth to this site.
hashiryu 9:14PM (12/31/2008)
Well don't read them if you think so Mr. Self-Righteous. I could care less.
Ry_Trapp0 12:26AM (1/07/2009)
drag strip numbers ARE real world. do you hammer the gas from every stop light or stop sign? do you rev the engine and drop the clutch to get onto the highway(barring any smart ass comments, these are rhetorical questions)? at a race track is the ONLY time that you do any of this performance stuff, whether it be lateral Gs or 0-60 numbers, this, they are the true "real world" for these numbers and the numbers should represent that. a 1/4 mile number without roll out(I.E., representing "racing" a 1/4 mile down the road) is useless to me, since back roads dont have timing boards to tell me what i ran.
every single performance number is absoloutley useless in, what you are calling, the "real world", because no one drives at 100% on their way to work. well, unless your a poser that buys a corvette Z06 to cruise down the boulevard instead of taking it open tracking of course, then the numbers are very useful for bragging like a moron.
Falcom 12:25PM (12/30/2008)
still crazy fast for a pickup.
Reply
Jared 9:43PM (1/04/2009)
I wish they would start doing 30-70mph times instead of 0-60. I've always been a fan of 0-60 times, but the way modern cars are going, I personally feel that a 30-70 or similar time would be a better representation of real-world driving senario (say... passing someone on a 1 way 45mph road)
Stumpy 12:29PM (12/30/2008)
4.4 or 5.2, still a great looking truck.
Reply
Esprit bird 12:29PM (12/30/2008)
Incredible motor...That would be a great engine to stick into a car and call Supra...but then again, it is Toyota.
Reply
Frylock350 3:04PM (12/30/2008)
That would just make for a Toyota Corvette wannabe. Supra's overengineered boosted straight six is what made it unique.
Gary 12:31PM (12/30/2008)
Nobody cares about "Sport trucks" nowadays.
Maybe it has the same fuel economy as a Prius? Some buyers will think so.
Reply