Bid farewell to BMW's legendary M inline-six
Click above for a high-res pic of the S54B32Say what you will about their design department, but BMW is known for producing some of the most amazing engines on the market. Especially the Bavarian automaker's stoic M division, whose current V10 engine has won its fair share of awards and then some. The same goes for the S54B32, Bimmer's internal code-name for the 3.2-liter iron-block straight-six which the company is now preparing to retire after seven years in production.
Over its lifetime, the 3.2 provided motivation for such performance icons as the E46 M3, the Z3-based M roadster and breadvan, and the Z4 M, as well as the exotic Wiesmann MF3. But with a new Z4 on its way, S54B32 is being sent to pasture, replaced now in various applications by Bimmer's highly-rated twin-turbo 3.0-liter inline-six. The latter is a a fantastic engine, but there will always be a special place in our hearts for the cast-iron 3.2.
[Source: Car via Motor Authority]
_opt_thumbnail.jpg)
_thumbnail.jpg "2011 Audi A8: Live from Miami")
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
andy 11:59AM (12/30/2008)
R.I.P my favorite N/A six if all time
Reply
SovietAmerica 11:59AM (12/30/2008)
The best engine on a "non-supercar" in the last decade.
Reply
Hike15 12:02PM (12/30/2008)
one of the best engines in the last decade period.
3seriesisking 1:15PM (12/30/2008)
It will certainly be missed. We are lucky however to have many examples of this engine in the states and I personally look forward to the prices of those cars coming down in the following years. What a great engine.
Trent 12:03PM (12/30/2008)
I agree it was time to move on but it is still sad to see it go when it is a better engine than most of the other car companies have currently.
Reply
2004m3driver 12:04PM (12/30/2008)
I'll miss that high strung rasp of the double VANOS. Oh wait nvm I get the pleasure of dealing with it everyday.
Reply
tenfifteen 12:17PM (12/30/2008)
Ditto. Interlagos '06 here. ZZZZAAAAHHHHHHNG
Bryant 12:19PM (12/30/2008)
So how exactly do we know it's gone?
Reply
Will 12:24PM (12/30/2008)
For the first time since its introduction, the engine will no longer be available in any new BMW when the redesigned Z4 appears. The current M3 has a V8 and the current flagship six-cylinder motor is the twin-turbo 3.0. As BMW moves away from naturally aspirated motors, there will be no place for the high-revving 3.2.
Bryant 2:28PM (12/30/2008)
That's not my point.
How do we know that BMW won't announce another M Coupe/Roadster between now and... whenever?
I wouldn't be surprised to see an M Coupe with the S54B32 and a pair of turbos on it, to be honest.
Toy Yoda 6:43PM (12/30/2008)
But if you stick turbos on it, it won't be NA, it would be a different motor. And why would they want to do that, since the new inline 6 already has turbos and probably thick enough cylinder walls for boring a couple of HP bumps over the next 7 years?
Coco 12:26PM (12/30/2008)
S54B32 was a torqueless POS.
as for the N54, I wouldn't put too much stock in that one either as it hasn't been proven yet.. never mind the nice $10k repair bill when the turbo fails...
Reply
jg 12:44PM (12/30/2008)
Where did you get that number?
tenfifteen 1:06PM (12/30/2008)
Spoken like a true troll. The S54's torque curve is flat, and there's plenty enough to get you into the HP. Enough to get the 3400-lb E46 M3 to 60 in under 5 seconds, anyway.
This sort of differential between HP and torque is common in high-revving engines (Ferrari's 4.3 has 480-ish hp, just over 340 lb/ft, the 997 GT2's plant goes ~400hp/300lb-ft). Having driven a friend's Z06 a number of times, I know huge torque feels nice and all, but it's not the only measure of performance. Getting into the upper limits of the RPMs and staying there are what these engines are built for.
Same friend also has a fairly modded STI (meth, tune, turboback, etc.) and it goes 340hp/400lb-ft of torque. Goes like stink, but absolutely dies up top. Can't imagine driving it on a track.
MikeW 2:21PM (12/30/2008)
This engine had the highest torque per liter of any volume production engine, ever.
Euro exhaust 83ft-lbs / liter (US 81)
The new M3 V8-74
Other Man 1:15PM (12/30/2008)
Bye bye.
I like the 3.0TT better anyway...
Reply
why not the LS2LS7? 1:03PM (12/30/2008)
I liked the engine, and I really didn't mind that it made its power through revs. I didn't even mind that the exhaust note sounded like crap.
But legendary seems a bit strong, especially when they were fragging themselves for a while and BMW was blaming the customers.
http://members.roadfly.com/jason/m3engines.htm
Reply
tenfifteen 1:33PM (12/30/2008)
From M3forum.net
http://www.m3forum.net/m3forum/showthread.php?t=189390
"QUESTION: I've heard about a "bearing recall" - what's that all about and should I avoid those cars?
ANSWER - (DonE) The bearing recall was a response by BMW to some engine failures on early M3 engines. The range of cars is from late '01 cars to early '03 cars.
The cause of the failure was two-fold, bearings that were out of specification, and in some cases an oil-pump that was out of specification. When this first surfaced - BMW believed it was the fault of the owners - but it soon became obvious that it wasn't an owner caused problem. BMW reacted by issuing a recall - which involved replacing the bearings and oil pumps in the effected engines, AND extending the warranty on the engine to 6 years/100k miles for OIL LUBRICATED parts on these engines. They also specified a new oil for the M3 engines - Castrol TWS 10W-60 oil (more on this in the "what oil should I use" question.)
If the engine recall was done - there is no reason to avoid these cars. Failures after the recall was performed have been rare - and in some cases, the 100k/6-year warranty covered other failures of these engines. If the recall wasn't done - it can still be done, and besides the 100k/6 year warranty, the work will be covered by BMW's 2 year repair warranty."
Reply
tenfifteen 1:34PM (12/30/2008)
Was a reply to "why not the LS2LS7?" above. Stupid commenting program.
why not the LS2LS7? 1:45PM (12/30/2008)
I believe I covered it better than you did. Did you read my link?
BMW had a flaw with their engine and they were fragging themselves. That's somewhat unlegendary.
Additionally, BMW was denying it was their fault, when a customer reported a problem, they would mention that the engine had recorded an overrev code (indicating the customer had created a mechanical overrev, a "flyer") and so it wasn't covered. Customers protested and said they had done no such thing but BMW was having none of it.
Finally, people with M3 SMG models started having the same problem, and it's supposedly impossible for a customer to create a mechanical overrev with that transmission because the computer controls it and won't allow it to be done.
Faced with this info, BMW finally began to issue service actions and correct the problems and stopped blaming the customers.
Blaming customers for your own problems is very unlegendary in my book.