DI FTW: GM unveils new direct-injection 2.4L EcoTec and 3.0L V6
Well, that was short lived. Ford just finished bringing its more powerful and efficient four- and six-cylinder engines to market in the Escape CUV, but the Dearborn CUV is going to have to kiss its crossover efficiency crown goodbye when the 2010 Chevrolet Equinox drops. Redone for '10, the new Equinox will offer direct-injection engines that deliver greater power and fuel economy improvements of their own, enough to push Ford's new powerplants out of the top spot. This evening GM has unveiled a 2.4-liter direct injection EcoTec four-cylinder that will kick out 180 horsepower while returning a projected EPA highway rating of 30 mpg (Ford's 2.5L I-4 produces 170 hp and returns a maximum of 28 mpg highway). It's a marvelous way to send the old 3.4 liter V6 into the sunset, but if you absolutely must have a V6, there's also a DI 3.0-liter version of GM's excellent "high feature" V6 delivering an impressive 255 horsepower (Again, Ford's heavily revised 3.0L V6 produces 240 hp).
Both engines have been developed with an eye (or ear) toward reducing the typically increased noise of DI engines. There are rubber isolators to keep the fuel rail racket down and attention to noise attenuation was an important aspect of the program. Variable valve timing also allows both engines to be more efficient over a broader rpm range. Backing both powerplants is a six-speed automatic transmission. Now all the General has to do is hang on 'till these cars hit showrooms and pray for higher fuel prices to further drive demand.
[Source: GM]
PRESS RELEASE
GENERAL MOTORS' NEWEST ENGINES HELP SAVE FUEL AND MONEY
- New technologies and vehicle enhancements will enable GM's 2009 domestic car and light truck lineups to save 700 million gallons of fuel over vehicle life as compared to the 2008 GM fleet
- Chevy Equinox four-cylinder model to offer class-leading highway fuel economy
PONTIAC, Mich. – Owners of the 2010 Chevrolet Equinox crossover will hit the streets next summer in a vehicle equipped with a highly efficient, all-new engine that will help save both fuel and money.
The 2010 Equinox will be offered with a choice of two new direct injected (DI) engines that use less fuel yet make more power – a 2.4L four-cylinder and a 3.0L V-6. The 2.4L engine delivers an estimated 30 mpg in highway driving (EPA certification pending), placing the Equinox at the top of its segment in highway mileage. Consumers who drive the 2.4L-equipped Equinox 15,000 miles per year will save 134 gallons of fuel or about $270 to $400 annually (assuming gas prices of $2 or $3 per gallon as compared to 2009MY Equinox).
The Equinox will join a growing roster of direct injected vehicles from GM, including the all-new 2010 Cadillac SRX crossover and 2010 Buick LaCrosse sedan, which, along with the Equinox, debut in January at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit. In fact, for the 2010 model year, GM will offer more DI models in North America than any other manufacturer.
"We first introduced direct injection in North America in the 2007 Saturn Sky Red Line and the Pontiac Solstice GXP," said Tom Stephens, executive vice president, GM Global Powertrain and Global Quality. "We've been rolling out the technology across our portfolio as quickly as we can so that our customers will have additional fuel savings options. Direct injection is a state-of-the art engineering solution because it enables improved fuel economy and lower emissions without sacrificing power."
In the 2009 model year, GM offers six engines in 18 models globally with direct injection. By 2010, GM will have eight direct injected engines in 38 vehicle models, covering 10 percent of its global volume. In North America alone, GM will offer 18 models with direct injection.
GM's fuel-saving lineup
GM's direct injection push is part of a larger effort to implement multiple fuel-saving technologies across its 2009 portfolio. The all-new 2009 Chevy Traverse crossover, for example, enjoys best-in-class highway fuel economy (24 mpg for FWD models) of any eight-passenger SUV, thanks in part to its 3.6L direct injected V-6 engine with variable valve timing. In 2009, GM expects to sell 500,000 vehicles with gasoline direct injection.
Here are additional fuel-saving facts about GM vehicles:
- Twenty models in GM's 2009 lineup deliver EPA-rated highway fuel economy of 30 mpg or more – more than any other automaker. GM's non-hybrid models rank first in highway fuel economy in both the midsize sedan and subcompact segments. (Chevrolet Malibu, Saturn Aura with 33 highway mpg; and Chevrolet Colbalt XFE and Pontiac G5 XFE at 37 highway mpg.)
- GM's 2009 domestic car and light truck lineups will use 700 million fewer gallons of fuel than the 2008 lineup, during the life of the vehicles, saving $1.4 to $2.1 billion in fuel costs, assuming gas prices of $2 to $3 per gallon. It's estimated that GM's 2010 lineup will add another 1.1 billion gallons of fuel savings and $2.2 to $3.3 billion, relative to the 2008 lineup.
GM's advanced engine technologies are already saving fuel today in vehicles on the road or expected to be sold in 2009. They include:
- More than 3.7 million vehicles with variable valve timing (VVT)
- 700,000 vehicles with direct injection
- 600,000 vehicles with Active Fuel Management cylinder deactivation technology, which automatically lets the engine run on half of its cylinders when full power is not needed
- 200,000 vehicles with turbocharged gas engines
- 42,000 vehicles with both direct injection and turbocharging
- More than 2 million vehicles with fuel-saving six-speed transmissions
2.4L DI details
The new 2.4L DI engine delivers an estimated 180 horsepower (134 kW) @ 6700 rpm and 172 lb.-ft. of torque (232 Nm) @4900 rpm. It uses technology based on GM's other four-cylinder direct injection applications, but with unique features designed for its specific application. This includes an 11.4:1 compression ratio that helps build power, slightly dished pistons that increase combustion efficiency and injectors with an application-specific flow rate.
GM benchmarked the best fuel system and noise attenuation products to provide customers with quiet operation.
3.0L DI details
The new 3.0L DI engine is a variant of GM's family of high-feature DOHC V-6 engines that also includes GM's 3.6L DI engine in the Cadillac CTS – an engine named to Ward's AutoWorld's 2009 "Ten Best Engines" list for North America, for the second consecutive year.
The 3.0L is rated at an estimated 255 horsepower (187 kW) and 214 lb.-ft. of torque (290 Nm), for an impressive power-to-displacement ratio of 85 hp per liter. (Output will vary by model.) The 3.0L DI features an isolated fuel injector system that reduces the direct injection high-pressure fuel system pulses for quieter operation. Rubber isolators are used with the fuel rail to eliminate metal-to-metal contact that would otherwise transmit noise and vibration from the high-pressure fuel system.
Along with direct injection technology, both the 3.0L DI and 2.4L DI engines use variable valve timing to optimize power and fuel efficiency across the rpm band, as well as reduce emissions.
How DI works
In a conventionally port fuel injected engine, air and fuel are mixed before they enter the combustion chamber. With GM's DI engines, fuel is sprayed directly into the cylinder where it is mixed with air. As the piston approaches top-dead center, the mixture is ignited by the spark plug; and when the fuel vaporizes in the cylinder, the air and fuel mixture is cooled. This enables the use of a higher compression ratio in the combustion chamber, which improves the engine's power and efficiency.
On cold starts, direct injection can be controlled to create a richer air/fuel mixture around the spark plug, making it easier to ignite in a cold engine. This results in a smoother operation of the engine and lower emissions during the cold start and warm-up, when most harmful tailpipe emissions are typically created. GM's direct injected engines reduce cold-start vehicle emissions by 25 percent.
Because the fuel is injected directly into the combustion chamber, direct injection uses higher fuel pressure than conventional fuel injected engines. This is enabled by a special high pressure pump driven by one of the engine's camshafts.












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
sydbot 12:49AM (12/18/2008)
Looks like Ford's 3.0L V6 makes a little bit more torque than this new DI 3.0L, odd considering than the GM engine likely has a much higher compression ratio. Shows us that Ford did some wonders on parasitic losses for that engine. How about GM buy Ford's IP for the VVT system they use on that new 3.0L, they'd probably see 270HP on the new DI 3.0L.
Reply
why not the LS2LS7? 1:53AM (12/18/2008)
Yes. Wonders. 4.5% more torque. It's amazing the rest of the industry can compete with such prowess.
MikeW 8:52AM (12/18/2008)
Ford's numbers are estimated.
More than likely 240hp 223ft-lbs occurs on E85
Did Ford talk up the variable intake system that Jaguar used in the s-type (235hp)
The cam-torque assist does nothing for peak power, other than allowing for a smaller oil pump, so that might be a difference of 1-2hp because GM has 4 phasers vs 2 of the Ford.
Lets see if Ford's 3.0 becomes SAE certified.
SK13 12:54AM (12/18/2008)
Pardon me if wrong, but I believe the reworked Ford 3.0L Duratec Six is NOT direct injected llike this GM motor. Also it is rated at 250HP on Ethamol85. Put DI on the Ford Motor and you're lookling at 270+HP.
Having said that, the Ford 3.0L is a completely different Motor from the 3.5L and it appears the GM's are the same design, having originated from the 3.6L.
Reply
sydbot 1:42AM (12/18/2008)
I never said that the Ford engine was DI. And it does make more torque, at 223 lb-ft, but less horsepower, even with E85. The Ford engine has some really neat advances that would work well on any engine, it'd be nice if the Big 3 shared these kind of developments (at a price, of course).
why not the LS2LS7? 1:55AM (12/18/2008)
What do I care what the E85 performance figures are? E85 costs more and produces worse fuel economy.
It will be interesting to see what happens when Ford puts DI on the Duratec. It could potentially get well out of the shadow cast by GM's DI V6s.
MikeW 9:29AM (12/18/2008)
The proof will be in the pudding.
Hopefully these will be the engines for the '10 Malibu.
So a drag race. Malibu 2.4 & 6t40 vs. Fusion 2.5 & 6f35
Malibu 3.0 & 6t45 vs Fusion 3.0 6f35.
What 'advances' on the Ford 3.0? dual knock sensors or camshaft torque phasing assist? There still isn't variable exhaust valve timing.
Most everyone else is going to electric camshaft phasing, though there isn't a consensus on electric intake or exhaust?
Electric power steering, sure that is an extra 5hp
Ford's 3.0 is nicely oversquare 89x79.5, it is no VQ30 though 93x73.3
If Ford's 3.0 really made 240hp on regular, there would not have a need/reason to put the 3.5 in the Fusion.
The 'sport' model could have just used the shorter automatic transmission axle ratio from the 2.5 (3.59 vs 3.06) and use the Haldex drivetrain.
psu48187 11:52AM (12/18/2008)
@ Mike W: I'm not really sure why you are questioning the performanance and power output of an engine that is already in use? The non-flex fuel version of the D30 is pushing 240 hp/223 lb/ft of torque in the Escape/Tribute/Mariner.
Why is Ford utilizing the D30 and D35 in the Fusion at the same time? Well eventually the D30 will be phased out with an Ecoboost 2.0 (or some variant phased in), and the D35 will become Ford's bread and butter engine.
As far as what the hp output will be when fueling the D30 with E85, according to MT that hp output will be pegged at 250hp.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/112_0812_2010_ford_fusion_quick_drive/index.html
MikeW 12:13PM (12/18/2008)
I don't believe Ford when they say 223ft-lbs of regular fuel.
That is 100% volumetric efficiency.
That is higher than the 3.7 (MKS on premium)
with only a 10.3:1 compression ratio, Ford is supposedly making more torque than BMW's N52 (which has a higher compression ratio)
Ford denied that the Mustang Cobra made less than 320hp
psu48187 12:35PM (12/18/2008)
The Cobra and overstated horsepower fiasco is how many years old? Using that as your line of reasoning doesn't build a case against the D30 and the stated horsepower claims. If anything a lot of manufacturers, especially since SAE's new protocols have been put into place, are understating horsepower these days.
Until some sort of instrumented scientific tests are put into place to discredit Ford's claims I really think it would be in your best interest to not spout off about how incapble the D30 powerplant is.
HotRodzNKustoms 1:01AM (12/18/2008)
Excuse me for playing monday morning CEO but shouldn't GM have trotted this new tech out like the day before the congressional hearings???
and can anyone tell me where the 4.5 liter diesel went????
Reply
That One Person 4:35PM (12/18/2008)
Actually, I think there was an article on here a while back about these engines. But I don't think numbers were said. But I do agree. Actually GM should have had these engines out at least a year or two ago. DI isn't new tech...
sdcarnut 1:09AM (12/18/2008)
Autoblog wrote: and pray for higher fuel prices to further drive demand.
>
> ahhh GM was already bitten bad in the ass with higher fuel costs, so you would have to think that GM is praying for cheap fuel so they can sell more cash cows ! if i was GM id rather sell alot more suvs-trucks than a few Equinoxes, here in so cal i prob see 50 CRVs for every 1 of the chevy CUVs , there both odd and ugly but guess which one sells alot better ?
Reply
arturo 1:12AM (12/18/2008)
I still like ford engines better for no apparent reason. :)
Reply
Esprit bird 1:13AM (12/18/2008)
They finally got rid of that miserable 3.4 ohv! looking froward to testing these cars out, hope there aint a 4 speed auto hooked up to them.
Reply
JF 1:29AM (12/18/2008)
I love how you have to mention its ohv, like you're trying to reinforce the tired ohv < ohc argument.
The 3.4 IS an old crappy engine, I'll obviously give you that.
pmalloy4391 8:52AM (12/18/2008)
The 3.4 may not be the best engine in the world, however i got over 200K racked up on my 99 grand am and she still purs (and i by no means babied this thing.. its still my first car i got it in 2001 with 65K on it)
MikeW 9:12AM (12/18/2008)
GM really sucked by still offering the 3.4 V6.
The 3.4 was replaced by the 3.5 V6 (see 2004 Malibu, '05 G6)
That 3.5 was replaced by another 3.5-short stroke version of the 3.9. (see '06 Impala)
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en/product_services/2009/HPT%20Library/China/2009_34L_LNJ_Equinox.pdf
That is what the minivans made, so seeing as the Equinox has electric power steering, add another 5hp on the top.
This is what the Equinox should be going out with.
http://media.gm.com/us/powertrain/en/product_services/2009/HPT%20Library/HVV6/2009_3500_LZ4_VUE_SAE.pdf
JRA 12:23PM (12/18/2008)
Why can't people take the time to look up something before opening their mouths to poop? There isn't a 4-auto on the current Equinox, and the article clearly states that the new one will have 6-speeds.
Nr9 1:17AM (12/18/2008)
the ford engines are superior and with DI will destroy these GM engines.
wait for ecoboost.
Reply