In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8

Click above for high-res image gallery of the Dodge Challenger SRT8
Back in September we reviewed the V6-powered Dodge Challenger SE, and our conclusion was that an uninspiring engine and benign handling was trumped by terrific curb appeal and an affordable price tag. The R/T model we reviewed yesterday fared even better, with a near perfect combination of brawn and beauty. It was fun spending time behind the wheel of both the SE and R/T models, but we knew we had to get our hands on a fire-breathing, 425-hp 6.1L HEMI V8 to see how capable the Challenger could be at full tilt. After all, there are few things in life better than classic muscle car looks combined with a brute-force V8. And if there are two available V8 engines, it just makes sense that we'd prefer the Challenger with the most powerful powerplant. Did Dodge hit the mark with its top Challenger? We welcomed the Challenger SRT8 into the Autoblog Garage to find out for ourselves.
Gallery: Review: 2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8
Photos Copyright ©2008 Chris Shunk / Weblogs, Inc.
Our TorRed Dodge Challenger SRT8 was stocked with options including navigation and an upgraded 13-speaker sound system. Its $44,180 price tag included a $1,700 gas guzzler tax, leather seating surfaces, massive SRT seats, 20-inch rims, and a 425-hp 6.1L HEMI V8 engine. The 44 large also buys owners the right to brag that they own the most exclusive and powerful new Challenger that money can buy.

We've been looking forward to driving the Challenger SRT8 since it was first announced, but we became even more curious after our time behind the wheel of the V6-powered SE model. We were hoping that the SRT treatment would cure all of the SE model's ailments, and Dodge's performance team provided plenty of raw power to help its cause. The 6.1L HEMI powerplant sounded sublime, and its 425 horsepower provided more than exhilarating bark.


In a straight line, this 4,110-lb coupe can flat-out fly. Just put the automatic transmission in manual mode (or don't) and smash the gas and the SRT Challenger becomes a 50-state legal missile. But since the Challenger is so damn big, it's difficult to ascertain just how fast you're going until you look at the speedometer. The list of vehicles with stronger straight line punch than the Challenger isn't very long, but there are plenty that have better moves when the road bends.


Dodge hit the ball out of the park recreating the styling of the original Challenger, but we were surprised to learn that it had similar handling characteristics to the original, too. The Challenger SRT8 has too much weight at its high belt line to be athletic, and its stiff yet uncommunicative steering gives inadequate feedback to the driver. When we had the opportunity to safely test the Challenger's capabilities, we got the feeling that if we pushed it too hard, we'd be on two wheels Dukes of Hazard style. No wonder the seats have such wonderful side supports.




While the Challenger SRT8's performance in the twisties was less than thrilling, it wasn't a death knell, either. This Challenger is more about presence and raw power, and far less about being a competitor to the fleet-footed Lotus Elise. This can be best illustrated by a trip to the corner store. As I was exiting a busy parking lot one day, a couple with three children were walking past the Challenger. All three boys had their necks craned to get an eye-full of the muscle car, and dad almost gave himself whiplash when I pressed the start button and lit up the HEMI V8. The Challenger is a real head-turner at any trim level, but with faux carbon fiber racing strips and stylish 20-inch rims, the SRT8 model just screams for attention.
The Challenger's classic rear drive muscle car looks are sure to stand the test of time. In fact, it's is a dead ringer for the 1970 model, yet Dodge designers managed to give the new model a truly modern flare. The long front hood, short rear end and wide stance brings a smile to our faces and thumbs-up from ogling onlookers. The hood looks menacing in appearance, and the absolute best view of the expansive metal comes from the driver's seat.

If the exterior of the SRT8 Challenger is the automotive equivalent of Carmen Electra, it's interior is a bit less voluptuous. We loved the comfortable, grippy SRT seats and were happy to see that Chrysler upgraded the steering wheel to include redundant controls that we could actually see (instead of behind the wheel). But for some reason, the painfully outdated and un-illuminated 1990's style cruise control stalk remains.


Another problem we have with the Challenger is the fact that the driver seat cannot be folded forward to let people in back. We mentioned this in our review of the R/T model, but it deserves repeating. You have to use the passenger side to perform this feat, which can be a real pain when you're the only adult and have to put two children in the back. We also would have preferred more contrasting materials in the cabin instead of a drab collection of blacks and grays.




We were pleased, however, with the overall attention to detail in the Challenger's cabin. Materials are soft to the touch and a pair of well-placed arm rests makes for spot-on ergonomics. Some performance coupes tend to wear on us over a long haul, but the Challenger is roomy, comfortable and a top-notch cruiser on the open road. Oh, and the trunk is 1986 Ford Taurus big, which is something that can't be said of the pony car competition.

After a week with the Challenger SRT8, we were quite addicted to its raw power and striking good looks. The Challenger SRT8 is all about turning heads and ripping off prodigious burnouts in the parking lot, and we're guessing fans of this Mopar muscle car would have it no other way. We would have liked a lighter and more agile high-end Challenger, but that would have only added to its $44,180 MSRP. The real question is whether the SRT Challenger is the king of Dodge coupes. The R/T model doesn't get hit with a gas guzzler tax, provides 90% of the power and 100% of the SRT8's handsome muscle car looks. Oh, and it also costs around $10,000 less. With that in mind, it's hard to recommend the SRT model as the one to buy.
Gallery: Review: 2009 Dodge Challenger SRT8
Photos Copyright ©2008 Chris Shunk / Weblogs, Inc.








Get a WordPress.com Blog




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Nick 12:01PM (12/03/2008)
Saw one yesterday it's pretty focking sweet looking!
A 90 year old lady wrapped hers around a tree down here killing herself on her birthday...
Reply
Shipey 12:07PM (12/03/2008)
What a way to go...
Cash 11:28PM (12/03/2008)
Good. I hope it was this version. Fake carbon fiber is so freakin lame.
Jj 12:06PM (12/03/2008)
It's disappointing, but I can understand if budget issues kept the designers from straying too far from the standard LX interior, but I really wish they had at least found the money for a smaller diameter and more sporty looking steering wheel.
Reply
BrianFL 12:09PM (12/03/2008)
Its sad that American cars like this are on the verge of dissapearing once again. We lose American carmakers we loose these beauties
Reply
Torrent 12:16PM (12/03/2008)
I like the review and the pictures, as always. But I agree about backseat entry. I saw one at the dealership a couple months ago with my 12 year old nephew, and decided to try it out. I almost broke the chair until I realized it doesn't tilt forward. I'm all "forget this", so I just tossed him between the two seats into the rear. Yeah...... Dealers don't like that. Then he just slid forward the front seat and showed me how it works. Embarrassing, but it was a revelation. I realized that a car with that much backseatage should have easy entry. So I'm getting a Camaro (not only because of the backseat, but because I've owned a few Camaros already, and could never pass the 5th Gen. up.) , but I still have an extremely high respect for the Challenger.
This car is bad. The good kind of bad. And stupid fast. The smart kind of stupid.
Wow. All that typing just for a backseat?
Reply
The_Red_Monkey 1:52PM (12/03/2008)
Lots and lots of cars that are two doors do not have a forward running driver seat for access to the rear seat. From a 1987 4 Runner, 1990 Bronco, 1995 Nissan 200 SX. I don't recall if the Mustang does or not but if they do its recent.
fixitfixitstop 10:27PM (12/03/2008)
So you want a 2-door AND easy access to the backseat?
....
Torrent 11:07PM (12/03/2008)
Yes, because My nephew spends most of his time at my house, and I have friends and stuff. The nephew and I went to Indy this year and saw the SS, and the backseat was really comfortable with easy entry. Just another Plus for me.
Will 12:29PM (12/03/2008)
I don't understand the dealer mark-up for these cars. I stopped by Big O Dodge in Greenville, SC last night and I counted 12 of them. Freaking twelve. Why would I pay $5,000 extra for a car if they have so many just sitting there?
Reply
Steve_S 1:33PM (12/03/2008)
Well after they go bankrupt maybe they will sell em for half off.
Whiplash 2:35PM (12/03/2008)
You don't have to. A buddy of mine said the salesman he spoke to was all too happy to knock off that charge to move the car quickly.
Mazda FTW! 12:39PM (12/03/2008)
I agree. The R/T...esp in white with tinted windows is the Challanger to buy. It's refined, has a good price and still conveys it's muscle power clearly!
Reply
Andrew 12:41PM (12/03/2008)
Definitely sounds like the R/T is the way to go. Powerful enough, cheaper, and a manual transmission. Although I don't like the idea of no hand brake with a manual transmission. I do think I'd probably end up with a Camaro instead. Even the V6 in that thing is respectable.
Reply
Chris 4:00PM (12/04/2008)
You can get the SRT8 with the same Manual transmission that the R/T has. The one reviewed in this instance just happened to have the Automatic option.
Mobius_1 12:43PM (12/03/2008)
Wow, although this car is not the best made or the best in corners (or "green") I just love what it stands for.
Reply
pd 12:56PM (12/03/2008)
Will, you think thats bad. I was at a auction last week and saw srt-8 with 1000 miles do 39500 and the dealer turn it down!!!
Reply
BigMcLargeHuge 12:56PM (12/03/2008)
There's little doubt you could push 425hp in the 5.7L.
Mopar already offers headers, full exhaust systems, and cold-air intakes for the Charger 5.7L.
R/T with MDS gets better economy. Its also apparently 100lbs lighter than the SRT?
Either way you get a car that looks like a Challenger. Which is a good thing.
I'm just agreeing with AB that if the interior and exterior are about the same, go for the one with lower cost of ownership and play around with your spare change.
Reply
tricky dicky 1:36PM (12/03/2008)
I'd like to see the weight of an R/T officially, not just by second hand guessing on the internet.
My SRT8 is 4100 pounds on the button with 3/8 tank of fuel and I would be shocked if the R/T was any lighter. I'll find one at my earliest convenience to see how close the performance is.
By the way, all you guys with big plans for a used 6 speed car you might need to wait to pull the budget gangster routing.. since some of the 6 speed transmissions seem to be grenading.
BigMcLargeHuge 2:34PM (12/03/2008)
"I'd like to see the weight of an R/T officially, not just by second hand guessing on the internet."
That wasn't a guess, that is official from Dodge's website. I said 'apparently' because I don't see where the weight is coming from either.
http://www.dodge.com/hostc/vsmc/vehicleSpecModels.do?modelYearCode=CUD200903