GM asks Congress to kickstart its heart with ambitious plan
General Motors has just revealed the plan it has submitted to Congress today, and the details show just how far the largest U.S. automaker is willing to go in order to secure bridge loans from the federal government. The plan includes selling Saab, possibly killing Saturn and scaling back Pontiac, as well as reducing dealers and shedding more workers, among other things. Here's the breakdown...- Focus on "core brands": Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac
- Launch predominately high mileage, energy-efficient cars and crossovers
- Sell Saab, HUMMER
- Sell or kill Saturn
- Reduce Pontiac to a "niche" brand
- Trim dealerships from 6,450 to 4,700
- Reopen talks with UAW to cut manufacturing costs further
- Reduce total workforce from 96,000 to 65-75,000
- Negotiate with lenders, remove $35.6 billion in debt
In exchange for government loans, GM is also open to a government oversight board that would monitor how the money is used, as well as giving taxpayers a stake in the company. Also, not only would Rick Wagoner get his salary dropped to $1, a number of other unnamed senior execs would get pay cuts, too.
Is it all enough? Sound off in the comments after reading the official press release from GM after the jump.
[Source: GM, Automotive News - sub. req'd]
PRESS RELEASE
GM Submits Plan For Long-Term Viability To The U.S. Congress
- Reaffirms GM's commitment to energy-saving vehicles and technologies
- Outlines the need for Federal bridge loans and line of credit
- Requests Federal board to oversee loans, assist with restructuring
- Aggressive plan details GM actions to support long-term success
The plan, submitted in response to Congressional hearings in November, includes a detailed blueprint for a successful, sustainable General Motors. Building on a product renaissance and comprehensive restructuring that has been under way for several years, the plan calls for:
- Increased production of fuel-efficient vehicles and energy-saving technologies;
- Rationalization of brands, models and retail outlets;
- Reduced wage and benefit costs, including further reductions in executive compensation;
- Significant capital structure restructuring;
- Further consolidation in manufacturing operations.
Any draws would be conditioned on achieving specific restructuring requirements in the plan. To help expedite these actions and protect the taxpayers, GM is also seeking the creation of a Federal oversight board to oversee the loans and restructuring plan.
GM is requesting the bridge loans and credit line because of a sharp industry-wide decline in vehicle sales. This decline, due in large part to tight credit and record-low consumer confidence, has led to a corresponding drop in dealer orders that is adversely impacting GM's first-quarter production schedules, revenue forecasts, and liquidity outlook. Federal assistance would enable GM to weather a credit crisis that has driven U.S. industry sales to their lowest per-capita level in half a century, and help the company emerge fully competitive with all manufacturers operating in the U.S.
The complete GM plan is available online: General Motors Corporation Restructuring Plan for Long-Term Viability. Following are highlights from the plan.
Product Portfolio and Fuel Efficiency – GM has made significant progress in revamping its product lineup, with new GM cars like the Chevy Malibu, Cadillac CTS, Saturn Aura and Opel/Vauxhall Insignia earning car of the year awards.While remaining a full-line manufacturer, GM will substantially change its product mix over the next four years, and launch predominately high mileage, energy-efficient cars and crossovers.
In addition, the Chevy Volt, which can travel up to 40 miles on electricity alone, is scheduled for production in 2010, and GM is planning other vehicles using Volt's extended-range electric drivetrain. By 2012, more than half of GM vehicles will be flex-fuel capable, and the company will offer 15 hybrid models. GM will continue development of hydrogen fuel cell technology, which, when commercially deployed, will reduce automotive emissions to just water vapor.
During the 2009-12 plan window, GM will invest approximately $2.9 billion in alternative fuels and advanced propulsion technologies, which offer fuel economy improvements ranging from 12 percent to 120 percent, compared with conventional gas engines. As a result, we expect GM to become a significant creator of green jobs in the United States, as well helping suppliers and dealers transform the U.S. economy.
Market and Retail Operations – In the U.S., GM will focus its product development and marketing efforts on four core brands – Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC. Pontiac will be a specialty brand with reduced product offerings within the Buick-Pontiac-GMC channel. Hummer has recently been put under strategic review, which includes the possible sale of the brand, and GM will immediately undertake a global strategic review of the Saab brand. As part of the plan, the company also will accelerate discussions with the Saturn retailers, consistent with their unique relationship, to explore alternatives for the Saturn brand.
Manufacturing and Structural Costs – GM will accelerate its current efforts to reduce manufacturing and structural costs, building on significant progress made over the past several years. GM currently has the most productive assembly plants in 11 of the 20 product segments measured by the Harbour Report, and it is a global leader in workplace safety. With the recently negotiated wage rates, turnover expected in our workforce, planned assembly plant consolidations, further productivity improvements in the plan, and additional changes to be negotiated, GM's wages and benefits for both current workers and new hires will be fully competitive with Toyota by 2012.
Balance Sheet Restructuring – Under the plan, GM would significantly reduce the debt currently carried on its balance sheet. GM plans to engage current lenders, bond holders and its unions to negotiate the needed changes. GM's plan would preserve the status of existing trade creditors and honor all outstanding warranty obligations to both dealers and consumers, in the U.S. and globally.
Compensation and Dividends – The plan calls for shared sacrifice, including further reduction in the number of executives and total compensation paid to senior leadership. For example, the chairman and CEO will reduce his salary to $1 per year. The plan also requires further changes in existing labor agreements, including job security provisions, paid time-off, and post-retirement health-care obligations. The common stock dividend will remain suspended during the life of the loans.
Temporary Federal Bridge Loans – GM is seeking a term bridge loan facility from the Federal government of $12 billion to cover operating requirements under a baseline forecast of 12 million U.S. industry vehicle sales for 2009. In addition, GM is seeking a revolving credit facility of $6 billion that could be drawn should severe industry conditions continue, resulting in sales of 10.5 million total vehicles in 2009. This bridge loan is expected to be fully repaid by 2012 under the baseline industry assumptions. Also, warrants issued as part of the loans would allow taxpayers to benefit from growth in the company's share price that might result from successful completion of the plan.
Once GM has completed the restructuring actions laid out in the plan, the company will be able to operate profitably at industry volumes between 12.5 and 13 million vehicles. This is substantially below the 17 million industry levels averaged over the last nine years, so it is considered to be a reasonably conservative assumption for gauging liquidity needs.
Federal Oversight Board – Given the importance and urgency of this restructuring for GM, other domestic manufacturers and the U.S. economy as a whole, the company supports the formation of a Federal oversight board. The board would help facilitate restructuring negotiations with a range of stakeholders.
GM's Commitment to Success
General Motors and its management are committed to the success of the plan summarized in the Congressional submission. The company's responsibility to its customers, shareholders, employees, retirees, dealers and suppliers is well recognized, as is its century-long commitment to our nation.
GM has never failed to meet a Congressional mandate in the important areas of fuel efficiency and vehicle emissions. We are among the leaders today in fuel efficiency, and set the industry standard for green manufacturing methods. We are committed to meeting the new fuel economy requirements of the 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act. The company's role in creating green technology and high-paying jobs of the future will increase substantially as a result of implementing the plan.
GM is proud of its century of contributions to the growth of our nation, and the company looks forward to making an equally meaningful contribution over the next century.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 8)
Torrent 4:34PM (12/02/2008)
fine. do it.
Reply
john 4:51PM (12/02/2008)
I don't any ever own any american cars so why soul I pay my taxes to help them out? What in it for the people like me who will never drive any u.s brand car?
Torrent 4:55PM (12/02/2008)
What's in it for you? How about a healthy economy?
and goddamn. Learn to type for christ's sakes.
pmalloy4391 4:56PM (12/02/2008)
john... If you dont wanna support your country in its time of need, move to japan or germany, you like giving them money now so go ahead we dont want you here
signed, america
Rev 5:06PM (12/02/2008)
Why do you hate America so much, pmalloy?
If he's a true American he should enjoy his freedom of choice and drive whatever brand of car he wants to drive regardless of the whining from a few flag-waving, "love it or leave it"-spouting sheep.
I have to show my patriotism by buying a crap car I don't want because of GM's problems? Yeah, right.
Derek 6:32PM (12/02/2008)
For the same reason that tax dollars went to the non-American car brands that set up shop in many parts of the US.
henrykrinkle 5:13PM (12/02/2008)
@john
i aslo cann tipe wit tonguue!!!~!
pmalloy4391 5:18PM (12/02/2008)
Its not about any of that at all, I am not even a hardcore patriot, i bitch and moan about our gov more than anyone. What I do care about, and so should all of you is what will happen to us as a country if we let them die, losses of jobs price increases and if you think we are in a mess now (they finally admit recession as of dec 07 today..) things will be way worse when the big 3 go away
So go ahead, buy your imports if you want, contribute to the demise of the country But i for one do not want to see my brother/sister/friends out of work because you wanted that shiney new honda and didnt want to support your own damn country.
I hope its the people who buy imports who lose their jobs first thats my only hope.
MasterCKO 5:28PM (12/02/2008)
Agreed. This plan actually makes a whole lot of sense. Scale back Pontiac to the niche performance brand it should be and sell off ones that they aren't core. Focus on the normal, mid- and big-luxury. I kind of agree that really, just Chevy and Caddy would make more sense, but Buick IS making a ton of money in China. Maybe they can transition Buick to a China-only brand?
And btw, get rid of GMC. Keeping this on board makes literally no sense. It has to be a dealership network issue as some have posited.
GeoSB8K 5:38PM (12/02/2008)
Agreed. Sounds like they have a decent plan this time around. I do hope however the money comes with some oversight and strings attached. They need to continue to feel the pressure so this event is well burned into their corporate culture. Execs taking commercial flights and driving hybrids should become more than just a short term response. At the very least until every penny of the loan is paid back.
john 5:57PM (12/02/2008)
Clarify, I don't hate the U.S, I'm an immigrant here and I wouldn't be here if I didn't like da U.S. Like they say, absolute power corrupts absolutely, so I think the corporate heads and dc are all corrupted. If GM wanted to survive so much, why wouldn't the damn CEO of it just resign like congress ask him to? Why is he lingering around when he probably crippled GM? And GM hasn't been doing great since the 80s, not just now. And I'm not just talking about GM alone, all the financial corps, they're should be in jail right now. Where's the justification in that? How do you punish a corporation? It's impossible, so I don't want to spent my hard earning dollars to bail any of them out. Let them go bankrupt so other small innovated companies can take over. The government should use those TARF money to invest in companies like Tesla, Fisker, ,hydrogen fuel and other alternative resources. I'm sure a lot of people feel the same way. It's all just my POV, but I'm sure if you ask for something long enough, you'll eventually get it, and I wouldn't like it a single bit.
henrykrinkle 10:44AM (12/03/2008)
@John Neff:
We'll only see your comments there if they're in complete agreement with RF's opinions. Unless you're one of his stooges, your postings won't see the light of day.
Pete 4:36PM (12/02/2008)
Isn't Saturn doing alright with the new Aura and Astra? Why not sell/kill Pontiac?
Reply
rndmnme 4:40PM (12/02/2008)
Because Pontiac can do small, Saturn can't do big.
Saturn G8... not so much.
Jj 4:46PM (12/02/2008)
I would be a little sad to see Saturn go too.
I liked the idea of using Saturn as an outlet to sell Opel's in the US. I would really like to see the Insignia sold here as a second generation Aura.
But alas, I see the obvious overlap with Chevrolet products and as much as I would prefer to have the Euro market models availible to me I understand that my views are not in line with the general car buying public.
rygar 4:49PM (12/02/2008)
Exactly! I think out of all of the GM products Saturn has the most promising future (if they let them). The Aura is an outstanding looking mid-size, the Astra is a cool hatch, the Sky looks way better than the Solstice.
Kill Buick. Seriously. Kill Hummer. Might as well kill or sell Saab too as GM neutered them when they bought them in the first place. Why not get rid of GMC and just make them all Chevy's? Actually do that with Hummer too, if they must see the need to keep the H3.
johncuyle 6:37PM (12/02/2008)
Killing Saturn doesn't mean eliminating the vehicles. The cars are just rebadged Opels. Killing Saturn just means killing the badge and dealer network, something they should have done ages ago. They can sell Opels branded as Opels through Buick dealerships, like they used to do in the 60's and 70's and should have kept doing the entire time rather than wasting su much time and energy on the Saturn nameplate.
jv2k 7:55PM (12/02/2008)
Pontiac is one of their higher selling brands that lost it's identity to take advantage of that fact, but started bringing it back before gas prices shot up and killed chances of that happening.
Saturn is a brand that has no identity and is just used to import Opels now.
LMBVette 4:35PM (12/02/2008)
Finally....GM is being realistic by talking about reducing brands.
I still believe they should kill GMC and Buick too and focus on Chevy and Caddy. I understand that they don't want to put too many Buick/GMC/Pontiac dealers out of business, but they should to save themselves.
Reply
tikirob 4:45PM (12/02/2008)
I think they want to keep Buick not only to have a mid luxury brand but also the success they have had in China with the brand. Saturn is really just re-visioning of existing products (Astra is to expensive to make). They would want to keep the G8 and Soltice (Sky)...make Pontiac into a performance brand which it should be.