Filed under: In the Autoblog Garage, Sedans/Saloons, Mitsubishi
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Mitsubishi Evolution X MR

Click above for a high-res gallery of the 2008 Mitsubishi Evolution X MR
Here's a revelation: being stuck in traffic sucks. And it's even more infuriating behind the wheel of an Evo.
Despite what some scribes might lead you to believe, the Evos of yore (VIII and IX) weren't deplorable daily drivers. Granted, Mitsu's engineers erred on the stiff side with the Evo's ride, and it didn't help that the tiller provided more feedback than a Metallica sound check. But the real reason jaded journos harped on the old Evo's workaday unfriendliness was because nothing is more frustrating than piloting concentrated adrenaline in a sea of buzzkill.
With the 2008 Evolution X, Mitsubishi attempted to rectify some of the Evo's (perceived) shortcomings by equipping the range-topping MR with more amenities, more sound-deadening material, a more compliant ride and a new twin-clutch transmission to balance back-road thrills with daily livability.
But all those extras have caused the Evo's curb weight to skyrocket, and its price tag has followed suit. For $42,000 – the sticker on our MR tester – you can get your hands on the new yardstick for high-end, entry-level performance: the BMW 335i. While that kind of wallet shock could ostracize the Evo's core demographic, Mitsubishi is quick to point out that the new MR is for the discerning enthusiast: a more sensible, mature owner. But does mature mean infirmed? Read on to find out.
All photos Copyright ©2008 Brad Wood / Weblogs, Inc.
Despite what you've seen plastered across the interwebs and on local newsstands, the new Evo is every bit as potent as its predecessors. But the MR takes a slightly different tack when it comes to serving up track attacks and tempered trips to pick up the kiddies.

At the heart of the Evolution experience are two elements that made the previous iterations a success with enthusiasts: a turbocharged four and a high-tech all-wheel-drive system. Both are present and accounted for, but they live up to the Evolution's namesake more than any other model in its 16-year history.


To begin with, Mitsubishi dropped its 4G63 workhorse in favor of the all-new 4B11 2.0-liter inline-four, originally equipped in the Lancer ES. But don't let its pedestrian origins deceive you. With a revised 9.0:1 compression ratio, a semi-closed deck, an aluminum block and a twin-scroll turbo, the new mill has proven to be incredibly capable and eminently tweakable. The turbo'd four is churning out 291 hp at 6,500 rpm, while peak torque – 300 lb.-ft. of the stuff – is available from 4,000 rpm. Those figures might not set the forums on fire, particularly when you consider the MR's 3,594-pound curb weight, but how that power reaches the ground speaks volumes about Mitsubishi's new dog and its trick tranny.


Mitsubishi has stepped up the dual-clutch plate with its TC-SST gearbox, the automaker's first foray into the world of automated manuals. Like the transmissions available in a variety of VW and Audi offerings, along with the Nissan GT-R and 2009 Porsche 911 PDK, Mitsubishi's 'box uses a duo of wet clutches to engage odd and even gears on two separate shafts. Six seamless gear changes are available at speed, with oil temps kept in check by an air-cooler.
Drivers can choose between three settings to meet their cog swapping needs: Normal, Sport and S-Sport. A button below the shifter allows you to choose your poison, with the Normal (default) mode putting a premium on fuel economy, slower shifts and a more tempered driving experience. Push up on the switch for Sport mode and the computer tightens throttle response, holds onto the revs towards the 7,000-rpm redline and provides the engine braking manual devotees require. For S-Sport, the Evo has to be stopped and the switch held forward for three seconds. This takes everything that's good about Sport and makes it great, but with the tach rarely dipping below 4,000 rpm to keep the turbo on boil, we found it's best left for the track. All three settings allow you to disregard the TCU's wiser-than-thou selection and choose your own ratio through either the steering wheel-mounted magnesium paddles or the central gear lever, but as we found later, there's no point – it's that good.

Driving around town and blasting down off-ramps, the TC-SST proves to be a remarkably competent and engaging gearbox. Up-shifts are virtually seamless without feeling artificial (ahem, CVT) and downshifts are dispatched with a quick pull and a computer-controlled blip. Even more impressive is the automatic mode, which takes tranny telepathy to an entirely different level. In Sport and S-Sport, gears and power are exactly where you want them, when you want them, whether you're braking into a bend or mashing on the throttle mid-corner.

In traffic, however, the TC-SST reveals that Mitsu's new toy is still a little wet behind the ears. In start-and-stop situations with the tranny set to Normal you can feel the clutch engaging and releasing, sometimes at inopportune times. Occasionally, when the packs loaded up quickly, we'd get a minor "clunk" from the rear differential as the plates locked and sent power to the wheels.* While not as refined as VAG's DSG, what the TC-SST lacks in finesse it makes up for in ferociousness – something that we had the chance to experience at Seattle's Pacific Raceway.

By sheer coincidence or act of car-God, a few weeks after our time with the MR we attended a "Mitsubishi Lancer Family" event allowing us to experience both the GSR and MR models on the track, along with the new Lancer Ralliart and an AMS-tuned Evo X (stand by for reviews).
With our helmet on, the TC-SST set to S-Sport and a race instructor to our right, we headed out onto the front straight of Pacific Raceway. The TC-SST ran through first, second, third, fourth and then fifth as we made our way into the first long, left hand bend.

Keen to see if the tranny's automatic mode would continue to impress, we braked hard before the turn, the gearbox shifting down from fifth to fourth to third just in time for us to apply power as we aimed for the apex. Mitsubishi's Super-All Wheel Control (S-AWC) system imperceptibly shuffled power to the appropriate wheels and the TC-SST shifted up into fourth – mid-corner – but did nothing to upset the Evo's balance through the bend.




Barreling down through the tree-lined back section, the wide straights and first few forgiving turns gave way to a tight and technical section of hairpins and elevation changes. The Active Center Differential (ACD) and Active Yaw Control (AYC) were now in their environment, delivering measured surges of power to the outside wheels while still retaining the subtle rear rotation we loved about the VIII and IX. Smooth, precise inputs may be the best way to lay down quick lap times, but with this much technology available to our extremities, we couldn't help chucking the steering wheel left to right and seeing how the electronics sorted things out. Powersliding bliss proved to be a few ham-fisted maneuvers away.


Just like the last two iterations of the Evo, the new MR (and GSR) allows almost anyone to channel their inner Makinen, and the Evolution is in its prime in a closed environment. On public roads, it's a similar situation. The MR does its best to coddle occupants with beautifully sculpted and supportive Recaros, responsive (and fade-free) Brembos and an intuitive touch-screen multi-media/sat-nav system, while the new dual-clutch transmission makes another compelling case to ditch the third pedal, yet still provides the engagement drivers crave.

But price may remain the sticking point for buyers cross-shopping in the $38,000+ range. The Evo MR's high-tech wizardry, rally roots, aggressive styling and driving dynamics are going to appeal to one subset of the population. Those more concerned with a badge, better interior materials (we're looking at you, dash and door panels) and rear-wheel-drive will win out with others. Just like the Z06 versus GT-R debate, it comes down to what you value in a vehicle and your proclivity for power delivery. Regardless of your choice, you're bound to have fun, and the MR is a sure bet to achieve it.
Mitsubishi provided the vehicle for testing, and arranged travel and lodging for our trip to Seattle. Special thanks to Concord Mitsubishi for allowing us to use one of their vehicles for another photo session.
* According to Mitsubishi spokesperson, Maurice Durand, the Evolution X MR we were driving still had a prototype tune on the transmission's computer. Mr. Durand tells us that some of these issues have been ironed out on the production model.
All photos Copyright ©2008 Brad Wood / Weblogs, Inc.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
shawn 12:14PM (9/10/2008)
screw this stupid twin clutch transmission. just give me a slick 6 sp manual and i'd do fine, the evo x mr seems like an overweight boring car to drive. i would take the cheaper gsr and at least enjoy the third pedal and the reduced curb weight, what a waste of money for the evo x, in canada the mr is 52000$, ouch thats a rip off, not worth it in my opinion, even the 5 speed gsr is a rip off.
Reply
Big Rocket 7:03PM (9/10/2008)
@shawn: This is the same "ripoff" that, despite its much lower MSRP, outran such sports cars as the Porsche 911 Carrera and the Lotus Elise SC. On two different courses, no less.
Source:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=126453
Rizzo 11:45PM (9/10/2008)
I got over $5k off the sicker of one of the last R32's last month and I'm happy. Happy that I dont look like some wanna be high school kid with a picnic bench for a wing. Happy that I dont have to look at an interior that was designed and installed by a sweatshop.
...but to each their own.
andresmo169 1:04PM (9/13/2008)
I could not agree with you more. Automatics are for SISSIES!!!
why not the LS2LS7? 12:17PM (9/10/2008)
I don't get why the MR would get more sound-deadening material. Isn't the MR supposed to be the lightest? Put the sound-deadening material on the regular model, let people who want it quieter just not get the MR.
3600lbs is pretty inexcusable.
I'm glad it works well though.
Reply
zamafir 12:31PM (9/10/2008)
at least it's not a pig in the twisties like the equally portly R32.
asdfasdf128 12:47PM (9/10/2008)
actually the RS is the lightest model evo.
keepster 12:57PM (9/10/2008)
The MR is suppose to be the "grown-ups" Evo. One to compete more with the "luxury" market. With leather and an auto-tranny it appeals to a different crowd.
With Evos, the less it costs the faster it goes. (IE: The RS model)
I own the GSR model, cheaper version. I could not afford a MR nor do I want a Auto. My car with me in it tips the scales at 3700lbs. Yet on the track my times are better than most and I am still a novice.
If you want to bust on how heavy it is think about the GT-R. The Tech out weighs the lbs.
I liked the review. It was fair. The car is underpowered. The Stock ECU tune is extremely rich. With just a quick tune the car picks up 50whp.
spdracerut 1:02PM (9/10/2008)
The RS was the lightest edition and is not available for this generation. The MR has been the range topping model with all the 'nice' stuff and the 'better' technology stuff; hence, the extra sound deadening, two-piece brake rotors, and SST tranny.
xpolarx 12:22PM (9/10/2008)
The Lancer Evolution has a long standing tradition of appealing to core performance enthusiasts, more interested in slalom speed and 0-60 times than comfort or curb appeal. This crap about marketing the X to a more discerning and mature owner is a shot in the foot, as far as I can tell. Lets call a spade a spade, here...it's a juiced-up econobox. It always has been...and that's why I've always loved it. But now it's trying to step into the ring with BMW, and I honestly think it's a futile effort. Who in their right mind would take a Mitsubishi over a BMW if the performance and the price are pretty much neck-and-neck? I think the old Diamond Star is being a little too ambitious.
Reply
Rob 1:11PM (9/10/2008)
When I placed my order for a 2005 Evolution VIII MR in February of 2004, the dealer was surprised. Even though I told him I would be there within 30 minutes of receiving a call that the car was official with a big check. Despite the fact that the car would probably be delivered 8 months from then.
Needless to say, I showed up with a deposit in about 20 minutes of the call.
I was barely 22. He told me he expected the buyer of the car to be around twice my age.
A waiting list started developing a week later. When I took delivery of the car on November 1st, there were 14 people on it -- in the event I bailed or he could get more. The average age was close to 40.
Keep in mind, if you're driving it like you should, you average around 16mpg on premium fuel. The synthetic oil is black as coal in 3000 miles. The A046s at $1200 per set (mounted and balanced) have had it after about 15,000 miles, plus you need serious winter tires. Brake pads are $600 just for the fronts for the OEM fitment, more around $400 for aftermarket. A full set of aftermarket rotors is $800, $1200 if you get the OEM ones (which are the exact... same... thing), and after 2 track days, you need 'em. Kids don't usually have 2nd cars, and I was in that group (not having a 2nd car). Using that thing as a daily driver AND track toy was expensive. What I was paying between fuel, car payments (despite 40% down), insurance and running costs rivaled people's mortgages.
Tourian 5:56PM (9/10/2008)
But the price isn't the same and the cars are not equal. A comparably equipped BMW costs way more then this car. I don't understand why people complain about the older Evos low rent interior and cheap car feel, but expect to get superior performance, sophisticated driveline with Super AWC (ACD+AYC), Brembo brakes, Recaro seats, etc etc, and still be 10-15 less then a BMW that has none of that. Or only 2-3K more then a MS3 or WRX that doesn't have it either. This is the main reason why the best Japanese cars usually aren't sold here or won't be brought over because Americans would rather pay more for a badge.
PS. Its not Diamond Star, its Mitsubishi. Diamond Star is a defunct joint venture between Mitsu and Chrysler. Mistubishis emblem and name simply mean "Three Diamonds"
wrussi 12:47PM (9/10/2008)
291hp on a 3600lbs chasis? hmm not so good.
if i had 38k to spend i would def not spend them on a lancer.
for that $$ i rather buy a base 135i at least it has a classy bmw badge on it.
Reply
chuck 1:23PM (9/10/2008)
A base 135i will cost you 37,000 with a sport package and leather, 800 will get you a chip that will get about 80hp/80tq to the wheels. I just don't know how they justify an EVO being at this price point.
Stumpy 1:38PM (9/10/2008)
I agree, that is the car I would get for that kind of money. Though the badge does not matter as much to me. It is just a small quick well made RWD car. What more could you ask for?
Frank 3:04PM (9/10/2008)
yea the price is too much for what you get ...
im not concerned w/ the badge ... for the money i would rather take a legacy gt spec.b and tune it to high hell ... im sure itd give the evo a run for its money.
Throwback 12:47PM (9/10/2008)
For $42,000 a 335I is had to pass up, as is a G37 coupe.
Reply
Torrent 1:03PM (9/10/2008)
42K? For a compact car? With 4 cylinders? and a Rear-View-Blocking rear wing? For 42K? 42 Thousand dollars? That's frickin Audi A6's price territory!
But I really like it, even though it's overpriced, overweight and overdone.
Reply
BigMcLargeHuge 2:26PM (9/10/2008)
I just checked GM's employee pricing. $41K for a base Corvette right now.
Okay, I realize that's top-of-the-line Lancer and bottom-of-the-line Vette, but still... a Lancer that costs more than a Vette?
The EVO might be fast, but its no performance bargain.
Bungle 2:45PM (9/10/2008)
No kidding. At 500 lbs. lighter and with a full 50% more power, the base Corvette is a *way* better performance bargain. You'll also get far better gas mileage (at least on the highway) and probably cheaper repairs and maintenance, too.
That's not to say that the Evo X MR won't sell well or appeal to a certain crowd, but $42K definitely puts it in enemy territory. The $30K-ish Evo XIII was the pinnacle of the Evo line, in my opinion; now it's older and wiser, but also fat and soft.