• 8
It's time to throw some ideas against the wall and see what sticks. Disclaimer: I have no inside knowledge to back up any of what follows. This is all pure speculation based on putting together some puzzle pieces that may or may not actually fit. Let's begin with a few things that we do know:

Daimler and Tesla Motors have some sort of deal, but we have no knowledge about the details. This news came out of an interview that Tesla Chairman Elon Musk did with Fox Business News a couple of months ago. At the time I speculated that this could be either a deal to license some battery management technology to Daimler or for the Germans to supply the Smart engine to Tesla as a range extender for the Model S. We now know that the idea of an ER-EV Model S has been discarded which brings us back to the first idea.

Recently we've heard about a couple of different Daimler projects that involve batteries. One is the ML450 hybrid. Mercedes has a contract with Cobasys to supply nickel metal hydride batteries for the ML450. However, business problems at Cobasys have led Mercedes to file suit against the company. A Mercedes spokesman told ABG that the program is still on track but did not comment on whether a sourcing change would be made. Continue reading this twisted little tale after the jump.

There are several possibilities here. Mercedes could reach an agreement with Cobasys and use those batteries as planned. Mercedes could switch to a different NiMH battery supplier or they could switch suppliers and go with a lithium battery. If the last were to be the case is it possible that Tesla could supply battery packs to Mercedes for its hybrid SUV? Possible? Yes. Likely? Not very. Tesla hasn't done packs for a hybrid system which would be more of a power battery while an EV uses an energy battery. Tesla also may not be ready to supply the kinds of volumes that Mercedes might need in 2009. On the other hand, Tesla is now assembling its packs in the U.S. and the ML is built in Alabama. Still, this an extreme long-shot.

Now the other possibility. Daimler is currently field testing a fleet of battery-powered Smarts in the UK using zebra batteries. The German company has already said they would switch to using lithium batteries sometime in 2009. They have also hinted at expanding the test fleet to California. Tesla makes lithium packs in California for its electric Roadster. Is it possible that Tesla might supply packs to Daimler for its California test fleet? It certainly seems plausible. The volumes of vehicles would likely be small, probably no more than 100-200 cars. Tesla could probably supply that number of battery packs.

In the fall of 2007, Tesla had a deal to supply packs to Norway's Th!nk but the deal was canceled after management changes at Tesla. The company decided to focus on launching production of its cars rather than supplying batteries to other companies. With the Roadster production still running exceedingly slowly it seems unlikely that Tesla is ready to jump back into this arena. On the other hand it could generate some extra revenue that the start-up could certainly use.

Tesla representatives declined to comment on any of these ideas. I could be full of hot air; it certainly wouldn't be the first time. It's all just food for thought. What do you think?


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 8 Comments
      • 6 Years Ago
      The problem is the maximum number of full charge-discharge cycles. Tesla's batteries can only withstand about 500 cycles. If you go 200 miles per cycle you get 100,000 miles, which is the Tesla design target.

      With a serial hybrid, you only go about 40 miles per cycle (i.e. the Volt). With 500 cycles, you get about 20,000 miles. This isn't enough miles. That's why GM is using a battery with different chemistry that can tolerate lots more charge cycles.
      • 6 Years Ago
      Why couldn't Tesla's battery pack be used in a hybrid? It certainly has enough power if it can cause a decent-sized sports car to out-accelerate many others with 12-cylinder engines. They would just make it smaller to lower the energy (and cost) since hybrids won't need as much. (Remember that the pack is modular so can be resized fairly easily.)
      • 6 Years Ago
      Going along the same lines as Sam - Another good reason for Tesla to partner up with Daimler - they need a rolling chassis for their sedan project. By supplying some packs to Daimler, perhaps they will also agree to some sort of deal in getting rolling chassis for the Whitestar project in exchange.
      • 6 Years Ago
      The guess about the batteries for the Smarts sounds more likely to me. Tesla's batteries aren't designed for hybrids. Could also likely be battery management as you guessed earlier. Given this deal involves a major manufacturer (Daimler), I'm guessing they will keep a very tight lip about it until they are ready to unveil the product, it's unlikely they will do any announcement about it beforehand like they with Th!nk.
        • 6 Years Ago
        Unlikely, Tesla's battery management is licensed from AC Propulsion. Daimler could just get them directly from there.
        • 6 Years Ago
        Unlikely, since Tesla just uses a licensed battery management system from AC Propulsion. Daimler could just go there directly.
      • 6 Years Ago
      HEY !

      The first FRENCH AIR CAR will be on the road the next year 2009 !

      visit here :
      http://www.ecolo-trader.fr/Premiere-immatriculation-de-la-voiture-a-air-compr-vtptc-94.php

      It's simple and without oil, but all bigs groups don't want to see it...

      Happy people only !
      • 6 Years Ago
      I have to say I get a little disappointed in ABG when its articles engage in speculation without any real news. We went through all this a while ago and nothing new has happened since.

      That said, I think Dave may be on the right track. I spoke a bit about this Daimler deal with Darryl Siry back at the Menlo Park store opening. He mentioned that, besides the timing, part of the reason the Th!nk deal might not have made sense was that Th!nk didn't have anything to offer Tesla (besides cash). The implication being that Daimler may supply something to Tesla in return (like a chassis or suspension system). He also seemed to emphasize Tesla's ability to supply entire drivetrains, not just battery backs, and that they weren't interested in licensing out their technology.

      None of this is particularly new, and these aren't direct quotes, just my impressions after a conversation that lasted 20 minutes or so and spanned several topics. So I suppose you can take that with a shaker of salt and add it to the guessing game. :-)
    Advertisement
    2015 Ford Mustang
    MSRP: $23,800 - $46,170
    2015 Toyota Highlander
    MSRP: $29,665 - $44,040
    2015 Jeep Cherokee
    MSRP: $23,095 - $30,895
    2015 Subaru Forester
    MSRP: $22,195 - $33,095
    2015 Honda Accord
    MSRP: $22,105 - $33,630
    Advertisement