KERS gets Formula 1 green light for 2009
Despite some serious reservations regarding the safety and high cost of the Kinetic Energy Recovery System
(KERS), the hybrid system has received the green light for introduction into the 2009 Formula 1 season. After BMW and Renault had some, uh, issues with KERS, Renault called a meeting to discuss whether the new flywheel-based system should be postponed until 2010. BMW Sauber, Honda Racing and Williams are apparently feeling confident enough in their own systems to resist the delay. Because F1 rules dictate that a consensus must be reached to change the previous ruling, F1 cars in 2009 will run with the new drivetrain. The only thing which could still hold back the new technology would be if the teams were unable to guarantee the safety of their systems, and this seems unlikely given that Honda has already completed a successful track test last week.
[Source: autosport.com]
_opt_thumbnail.jpg)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Benfolio 9:36AM (8/06/2008)
......what is the point of this system again?
Reply
Ermax18 9:45AM (8/06/2008)
To get cool points for being a poser green. I just don’t see why people get all bent out of shape over motor sports emissions. These cars, including all the transporters don't eat as much as one traffic light in rush hour.
Oh I already know what response I will get. They are doing it to develop new technologies for road cars right. Wrong. Don't kid yourself. This is all for marketing BS.
Adam Marcello 10:10AM (8/06/2008)
Its all a front to make it seem like they are eco friendly using electricity. In reality they are going to use hundereds of these batteries because they are only used for 1 race.
I think it will be pretty cool to have a go fast button though. It might make passing available in more areas of the track.
Derek 10:13AM (8/06/2008)
To ensure hilarity in the pit lane.
Soccer Mom 10:14AM (8/06/2008)
To recover energy from breaking so that it can be used to assist acceleration as required (like an extra kick in a butt when exiting corners or accelerating down the straight line).
tankd0g 10:42AM (8/06/2008)
Because turbo buttons connected to -turbos- are so 20th century.
why not the LS2LS7? 11:16AM (8/06/2008)
Actually Ermax18, the cars, especially including the transporters do eat a significant amount of gas. I don't understand your traffic light thing, but I believe the bill for gas for one of the race cars alone is over $1,000 per race weekend. And that doesn't count the transporters, or getting 25 people there to a race. And then sometimes the races are in Malaysia, necessitating flying the stuff around.
youcouldntfindme 9:38AM (8/06/2008)
Might make for a shocking season?
/Shoots self for horrible pun...
Reply
youcouldntfindme 9:38AM (8/06/2008)
Might make for a shocking season?
/Shoots self for horrible pun...
Reply
youcouldntfindme 9:40AM (8/06/2008)
To be used as a pass button... I dunno why? What's to stop someone from using it everytime it has a charge? I would, it'd make me faster on the track per lap then those using it only for passing...
Reply
Stanton 10:16AM (8/06/2008)
It's not just for passing. It can be used anytime. KERS will be allowed to add up to 60kW to the drivetrain, up to a maximum total energy output of 400kJ per lap. (at the peak 60kW, that would be 6.67 seconds of driving with the additional power). There's no restriction saying you can only use it when you're behind someone and trying to overtake
Brad 9:54AM (8/06/2008)
Funny how the FIA & Max Mosely are so concerned about keeping the costs down in F1 but they keep making these stupid rules FORCING the teams to spend a lot of money for this technology.
Switching from proven V10's to 2.4 V8's was supposed to be a cost saving measure. But it takes more money just to develop a new engine.
It just seems like for every step forward they try to take, it costs them two or three steps backwards.
Reply
geo.stewart 9:59AM (8/06/2008)
to paraphrase a NASCAR owner
"I cant afford for them to keep saving me money"
Dustin 10:22AM (8/06/2008)
Obviously keeping costs down is not their one and only objective.
And who's being forced? Isn't the point of this news story that the majority of teams want to use KERS?
why not the LS2LS7? 11:20AM (8/06/2008)
V8s were not supposed to be a cost saving measure. It was to reduce power.
But they allowed rev-restricted V10s for a while so that teams that didn't want to develop new engines and typically bought last years motors off someone else could continue to buy old V10s until there were cheap V8s to buy.
Once all the kinks were worked through, I have to imaging the V8s did end up costing no more then the V10s.
I do agree with the main sentiment, which is that none of this KERS stuff makes the cars more affordable. I also think that in F1, traditionally the teams have done the innovating instead of it being legislated. So I'm not sure where KERS fits.
kfj 9:56AM (8/06/2008)
Since this is to make F1 more green are they are going to put less fuel in the cars now?
Reply
Leland Michaels 10:02AM (8/06/2008)
Because life mimics art... I mean F1 mimics Burnout/NFS: Underground/Speedracer.
I'm sure they are trying to make the race series appealing to a larger audience by creating more entertaining lead changes. If it works, it will be unique to this series. They will dominate the ESPN Top 10 with all of the fancy/dramatic footage!!!!
Reply
Benfolio 11:01AM (8/06/2008)
I'm waiting for the day when an F1 driver can double pump the gas pedal and do wheelie with flames spouting from the exhaust.
gary 10:13AM (8/06/2008)
F1 today has been pretty asinine for the last 10 years and should be called the 'Bernie & Max Traveling Money Show'.
Reply
why not the LS2LS7? 11:21AM (8/06/2008)
Unless running KERS is mandatory, I still think that if I'm a top team I wouldn't use it. Because poor reliability does not win championships, and in the first year, KERS will likely be problematic.
Reply