
Click above for more of the IIHS side impact crash tests for small pickups
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety recently performed side crash tests for the first time on small pickups. Their sampling included the Toyota Tacoma, Dodge Dakota, Ford Ranger, Nissan Frontier and Chevy Colorado. The results were published today and they indicate that small pickup owners might want to start wearing helmets while driving.
The IIHS has only three grades for its crash tests: Good, Marginal and Poor. The Dakota, Ranger and Frontier all earned Marginal ratings, while the Colorado could only muster a Poor rating due in part to the moving barrier actually coming in contact with the dummy's head during the simulated crash. The Tacoma, however, was the only vehicle to earn a Good rating. It was also the only small truck tested with side air bags, which are an option for 2008 but will be standard equipment on 2009 Tacomas.
If side airbags are an option, the IIHS will, as a rule, test a vehicle without them unless an automaker wants to rerun the crash test with a model that has side airbags and is willing to pay for the cost of the vehicle that's crashed. Not unsurprisingly, the archaic Ranger was the only small pickup that doesn't offer side airbags at all, though it was surprising that none of the other automakers requested their models be tested with side airbags. The IIHS also tells us that small pickups have the highest driver death rates of any vehicles on the road, which makes these tests all the more significant.
Check out the official press release after the jump, and peruse the gallery of crash test photos below to witness the utter crappiness that is small pickup crash worthiness.
[Source: IIHS]
PRESS RELEASE
First time Institute side tests small pickups: Toyota rates good, but results for others are 'dismal' and key safety feature isn't standard on most models
ARLINGTON, VA - Small pickups aren't providing as much protection in side crashes as many new cars and SUVs. The Toyota Tacoma was the only one of five small pickup trucks, all 2008 models, to earn the highest rating of good for occupant protection in recent side crash tests conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The Dodge Dakota, Ford Ranger, and Nissan Frontier are rated marginal, and the Chevrolet Colorado is rated poor in the side test, which simulates a side impact from an SUV or another pickup.
"More people may be looking at small pickups because of rising gas prices," says Institute president Adrian Lund. "Unfortunately, they won't find many that afford state-of-the-art crash protection. Most earn dismal ratings for protecting people in side crashes, and all but the Tacoma and Frontier lack electronic stability control, which is a key feature in preventing crashes. Until they improve, most small pickups aren't good choices for people looking for safe transportation."
Tacoma earns the only good rating in side test: Performance in side tests is important because side impacts are the second most common type of fatal crash, killing nearly 9,000 occupants in 2006. The Tacoma's side airbags did a good job of reducing forces on the driver dummy and the passenger dummy in the back seat in the Institute's test. The curtain-style airbag that deployed from the roof above the side windows protected the dummies' heads from being struck by any hard structures, and the risk of significant injury to the head/neck and chest was low. Measures recorded on the driver dummy indicate a fracture of the pelvis would be possible in a real-world crash of this severity. The Tacoma's structure held up reasonably well, preventing major intrusion into the occupant compartment.
The Tacoma also is rated good for frontal crash protection, but its seat/head restraints earn the second lowest rating of marginal for protection against whiplash in rear-end crashes. If Toyota improves the Tacoma's rear crash rating, this manufacturer would have the only two pickup models to earn the Institute's TOP SAFETY PICK award so far. The other is Toyota's Tundra, a large pickup truck.
The Tacoma is the only pickup in the group of small models that was tested with side airbags, which are optional in 2008 models. When side airbags are optional, the Institute's policy is to test a vehicle without the option. An auto manufacturer may request a second test with the airbags if the automaker reimburses the Institute for the cost of the vehicle. Manufacturers of the Dakota, Frontier, and Colorado didn't request second tests (side airbags aren't offered in the Ranger, even as options). The Tacoma was tested only with its optional side airbags, an exception to normal policy because such airbags will be standard in 2009 Tacoma pickups being shipped to dealers this month.
"We assume the other manufacturers don't expect their vehicles to perform much better, even with the optional side airbags," Lund says. "In contrast, Toyota is ahead of its competitors in making the latest safety equipment standard on small pickups. Consumers shouldn't have to choose safety from an options list, and they shouldn't buy any vehicle that isn't equipped with side airbags and electronic stability control."
In 2008 side airbags are standard in more than 65 percent of new vehicle models, and manufacturers have pledged to make such airbags standard across their fleets by the 2010 model year. A federal side impact standard that essentially will require side airbags goes into effect in the 2015 model year.
High death rates: Small pickup trucks have the highest driver death rates of any vehicles on the road, including minicars. In 2006 small pickups experienced 116 driver deaths per million registered vehicles 1-3 years old. This compares with 106 for minicars, 99 for small cars, and 42 for small SUVs. Part of the reason is that small pickup trucks are more likely than other passenger vehicles to be involved in single-vehicle crashes, especially rollovers.
Electronic stability control is a feature that can help prevent crashes, but it's not available on many pickups. It's standard on 12 percent of 2008 pickups, and it's not available at all on 67 percent. In contrast it's standard on 64 percent of cars and 95 percent of SUVs. The only pickups in this group of small models with available electronic stability control are the Tacoma and Frontier. Toyota has made this feature standard on the Tacoma starting with 2009 models. It's also standard on the 2009 Colorado and GMC Canyon.
"We would expect electronic stability control to significantly reduce the single-vehicle crash risk in small pickups," Lund says. "It's a lifesaving feature that should be standard on all of these vehicles."
Worst performer is the Chevrolet Colorado: Also sold as the GMC Canyon, this model was the only one to earn the lowest rating of poor in the Institute's side test. The driver dummy's head was hit by the top of the Institute's moving barrier during the impact. Plus the side structure of the Colorado allowed a lot more intrusion into the occupant compartment than the other pickups.
In addition to the side tests, new frontal offset crash tests were conducted for the Colorado and Dakota. While the Dakota earned a good rating, the Colorado is rated acceptable overall for occupant protection in frontal crashes. In the frontal test of the Colorado, intrusion by the tire and wheel into the driver footwell area combined with separation of the footwell from the doorsill trapped the driver dummy's left foot underneath the brake pedal. The pedal had to be cut off to free the foot. This entrapment resulted in a structural rating downgrade for the Colorado. Still, injury measures for the dummy's head, neck, and chest were low.
Back jump seats of Ranger aren't safe for children: All of the small pickup trucks the Institute recently tested, except the Ford Ranger, are crew cabs with bench seats in back. Instead of this, the Ranger is equipped with two side-facing jump seats too small for anyone but very small adults or children. This pickup's side rating of marginal applies only to front-seat occupants.
The Institute doesn't recommend riding in jump seats. Aside from lack of space, jump seats just have lap belts. A study conducted by the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia found that children riding in the small back seats of pickup trucks like the Ranger are about 4 times as likely to be injured in crashes as those in the back seats of other vehicles.
How vehicles are evaluated: The Institute's frontal crashworthiness evaluations are based on results of 40 mph frontal offset crash tests. Each vehicle's overall evaluation is based on measurements of intrusion into the occupant compartment, injury measures recorded on a Hybrid III dummy in the driver seat, and analysis of slow-motion film to assess how well the restraint system controlled dummy movement during the test.
Side evaluations are based on performance in a crash test in which the side of a vehicle is struck by a barrier moving at 31 mph. The barrier represents the front end of a pickup or SUV. Ratings reflect injury measures recorded on two instrumented SID-IIs dummies, assessment of head protection countermeasures, and the vehicle's structural performance during the impact.
Rear crash protection is rated according to a two-step procedure. Starting points for the ratings are measurements of head restraint geometry - the height of a restraint and its horizontal distance behind the back of the head of an average-size man. Seat/head restraints with good or acceptable geometry are tested dynamically using a dummy that measures forces on the neck.












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Alex @ Jul 24th 2008 11:00AM
"The IIHS also tells us that small pickups have the highest driver death rates of any vehicles on the road"
Do they look at motorcycles?
Dan @ Jul 24th 2008 1:37PM
According to the IIHS's most recent driver fatality rates publication (2007, covering MY01-04), small pickup trucks had lower driver death rates than all 2-door non sports cars, mini 4 door cars, small 4 door cars, mini and midsized sports cars...
nardvark @ Jul 24th 2008 11:07AM
The IIHS rating system actually goes "Good, Acceptable, Marginal, Poor."
mk @ Jul 24th 2008 11:09AM
Most motorcyclists are highly conscientious drivers. And far fewer than people who drive small trucks.
On one hand, these results seem bad.
On the other hand... how much do we hear about small trucks being in this sort of accident, and killing lots of people above and beyond the standard auto accident death rate. Car accidents kill people, and the laws of physics aren't going to change.
So, now I suppose, rather than making small trucks more attractive to buy, nimbler, and more capable of emergency maneuvers to avoid accidents, They'll load up on the air bags, and the high strength steel pillars, and jack the size and weight of these trucks up even closer to full-size trucks, and make them even less efficient, less affordable, and hardly different than buying a full size truck.
We all know that mainstream family cars are porkier than ever, when simply being lighter would yeild efficiency, but crash testing has to be considered, and vehicles become mobile examples of padded cells.
I am all for safety, but sometimes overboard is still overboard with diminishing returns. the laws of physics still apply, and judgment is swiftly carried out. Two items made of matter cannot occupy the same space at the same time. Airbags don't change that.
Dude @ Jul 24th 2008 11:23AM
What's worse is that the heavier these things become, the more severe the impact.
RJ @ Jul 24th 2008 12:45PM
More emphasis should be placed on training better (more defensive, like bike riders) drivers, rather than bullet-proof vehicles.
Let's face it, I don't care if a family sedan is rated "super-duper" by the IIHS, if you get hit on the side, by a F450 doing 60 mph, you're absolutely toast.
A lot better to train drivers NOT to get into ugly situations.
Richie @ Jul 24th 2008 5:27PM
Better still: train drivers NOT to get into ugly vehicles, good grief.
shadysi @ Jul 24th 2008 11:10AM
So was safety never an issue with pickup trucks before? did people just think they would could roll over everything else in the road?
scappy @ Jul 24th 2008 11:13AM
I think I should just break down and get a sport bike too.
When the weather cooperates I bike (bicycle) to work, which everyone tells me is going to get me killed. Now the IIHS tells me the my other means of transportation (07 Ranger) is going to get me killed.
Sounds like I'm screwed either way, might as well just get it over with and get me a sport bike, no?
Funny how people just assume bigger vehicles are safe too. I know the Ranger is not the safest thing with four wheels, but I don't care. But people still look at it and assume I'm safe in comparison to say a Focus.
Nick @ Jul 25th 2008 11:36AM
Nah dude... Keep Biking, its good for you. If you need a small truck for utility purpose, buy a people carrier with a V6. something like a Dodge Caravan, or a Chevy Venture(Oldsmobile Silhouette etc..). Sportbikes aren't so Great. If you want a motorcycle, buy a chopper, they are both bad ass, but good on gas, and ALMOST could be considered fast. Plus, you wont feel like a jackass wearing a leather jacket with a Harley, or Triumph patch on it, because you would own one.
David @ Jul 24th 2008 12:50PM
There's risks associated with every activity. I'm not going to live in fear because of it. You could die from slipping in your bathtub or falling down your stairs. I still ride my motorcycle despite the supposed guarantee that I'll die on it. I minimize my risk by dressing for the possible crash and staying alert when I'm on it. I have to swerve at least once every time I commute home...
In any case, cars wouldn't need 15 balloons in them if cars weren't 2+ tons and driven by retards.
Vintage @ Jul 24th 2008 11:17AM
Um. Duh. It's been this way for decades.
f650 @ Jul 24th 2008 11:20AM
No surprising as the Taco is the only model up there that seems to get money in R&D. The other models seem to be the step-children of manufacturers where as tacoma's (at least around here) sell extremely well. The number of new rangers and colorados I see pales in comparison.
Xcountryflyer @ Jul 24th 2008 2:03PM
Totally agree. Toyota seems to be the only one interested in putting effort into this segment. If they can get MPG and efficiency up in this segment, I'd see people buying these midsize pickups again. If you get the same MPG as a fullsize, why bother unless its size of vehicle issue.
havoc @ Jul 24th 2008 4:02PM
i kind of took from the article that the taco only had the improvment due to it's side curtain airbags (an option on the frontier and prob the others as well).
is there any statistic within the 116 deaths per million/single vehicle accident (roll overs) that mentions death or injury by foreign object such as cargo? the open bed and high windows would account for some of this (i would think).
stratojet @ Jul 24th 2008 10:15PM
Tacoma: 16/20 mpg
Colorado: 15/20 mpg
No big advantage here.
As far as crash protection, it just inflates the price. Nobody buys a truck , or a car for safety reasons. When India or China will come up with a plain Jane, no air bag, no abs, no stabilitrack, no nothing but a super price, then we'll see if safety sells.
Safety, IMHO, is the same as the new "green" market.
A lot of customers like to say they want it, but in the end, most don't act on it. Customers wish wish wish but when they buy buy buy, the story is quite different.
Frylock350 @ Jul 28th 2008 7:16AM
You know what's sad for these compact trucks. The sticker on my Suburban is only 1mpg off those numbers and it couldn't be better on the IIHS tests.
Tacoma's better rating is because Toyo provided a model with side curtain bags. Why Nissan and GM didn't is beyond me.
tankd0g @ Jul 24th 2008 11:25AM
I would still rather be in one than a Miata! :)
Jeff @ Jul 24th 2008 11:29AM
Good luck with that:
"High death rates: Small pickup trucks have the highest driver death rates of any vehicles on the road, including minicars."
tankd0g @ Jul 24th 2008 11:32AM
Miata isn't a mini car, it's a convertible death trap. If they were sold in the numbers pickup trucks were we'd see an epidemic of people with their heads popped off.