Malcolm Bricklin filing a multi-billion RICO lawsuit against Chery Motors
Back in 2004 serial automotive entrepreneur Malcolm Bricklin announced plans to collaborate with "rogue" Chinese automaker Chery Motors to bring new cars to the US market. Chery is referred to as "rogue" because the company never actually got permission from the Chinese government to get into the car business. Needless to say, the deal eventually fell apart when Chery decided to hook up first with Israel Corp and Quantum LLC for a different joint venture which has also yet to come to fruition. Bricklin's company, Visionary Vehicles, which is now know as V Cars LLC, has now filed a lawsuit against Chery, Israel Corp, and Quantum LLC, et al. The suit is being filed under RICO statutes, typically used to go after mobsters, and V Cars is hoping to pursue Chery for the potential profits the company feels it could have made over the course of the deal. How much? $14 billion.
V Cars claims they provided Chery with business plans and ideas (along with $26 million in up front investments) which they then used for their own business after abandoning the deal. During a conference call today, Bricklin explained that he wants to show Chery and other Chinese companies that if they are going to do business with western companies they need to deal ethically and follow the rules. V Cars is also seeking injunctions to prevent Chery from selling any vehicles based on these plans in North America. The complete text of the suit that has been filed in Federal District Court in Detroit can be read here (Warning: PDF download).
[Source: V Cars]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Graham 1:44PM (7/21/2008)
Who would have thought that something Malcolm Bricklin was involved in would be a miserable failure...
Reply
geo.stewart 1:57PM (7/21/2008)
who thought dealing with the Chinese over IP would end with a royal drubbing?
Torrent 1:56PM (7/21/2008)
What does this have to do with Chery or that guy?
It was funny though.
Reply
why not the LS2LS7? 1:57PM (7/21/2008)
On top of this, I don't get how Chery is allowed to bring cars to GM's backyard when they unabashedly knock off the Chevrolet Spark as the Chery QQ.
GM should get some percentage of Chery's revenues in the US as compensation until they are made whole (and given the QQ sells well in China, that's gonna be a while).
Reply
Rocketboy 9:49AM (7/22/2008)
Because GM is working with Cherry... simple as that.
Throwback 1:58PM (7/21/2008)
Another Bricklin venture that fell apart. I'm shocked!
Reply
Throwback 1:58PM (7/21/2008)
Another Bricklin venture that fell apart. I'm shocked
Reply
Soccer Mom 2:08PM (7/21/2008)
I certainly hope they win.
China, despite is WTO membership and other agreements, is acting as a used car salesman in every respect. This culture of take one-time profit and run, screwing partners and disregarding any agreements, laws and ethical rules, applies not just to small businesses, but all the way to the government.
I hope that this type of litigation will make them think twice.
Reply
John 8:55PM (7/21/2008)
I'm waiting to see the lawsuit against bricklin for the $2 million he scammed out of each one of his dealers.
It's easy just to bash the Chinese when your own history is full of scandal. Ask the folks in Newfoundland who Bricklin scammed out of millions in the 1970's.
Paul 2:20PM (7/21/2008)
This could be a very good thing in the long run for the Chinese automakers. The earlier they learn to play by western rules the sooner they will be producing a product that people in the western world may want to buy.
Reply
tankd0g 2:28PM (7/21/2008)
Yeeeah....good luck with that.
Reply
Rocketboy 2:29PM (7/21/2008)
"Needless to say..."
Then why did you?
Reply
robert bell 2:46PM (7/21/2008)
anyone dealing with the Chinese needs to keep one hand on their wallet and one eye on their "partner."
chinese business "ethics" can be summed up in "whatever it takes at whatever cost." They do not share any sense of business ethics in the Western sense of that phrase; hence, their breach of contracts and piracy of intellectual property rights not only with no remorse but with an attitude that such behavior is acceptable if they achieve their objectives.
Anyone doing a JV with a Chinese firm has beter have a plan B and your lawyer on speed dial.
Reply
Austin 2:43PM (7/21/2008)
Hit them hard!!
Reply
zedster 3:00PM (7/21/2008)
will he make a sv-2 with the money if he wins?
Reply
icu812ru469 3:17PM (7/21/2008)
Boo hoo hoo... China isn't doing anything that every other scummy country, including the U.S., hasn't done in the past during their economical infantcy. Mr. Brickhead is just pissed that he got screwed by the Chinese before he screwed them... nothing new.
Reply
I_Hate_China 3:27PM (7/21/2008)
So Chery is effectively blocked from selling anything in the US if Malcolm prevails.
Reply
Corey W. 3:47PM (7/21/2008)
Maybe I'm in the wrong business?!?! How do you get 26M in upfront cost, squash the deal, then keep the money... WTF!! ;-)
Reply
Gardiner Westbound 4:12PM (7/21/2008)
Malcolm has figured out there may be more money in suing people than making cars.
Reply
iQuack 4:43PM (7/21/2008)
Malcom Bricklin is a reincarnated Preston Tucker.
Reply