
Click above for high-res gallery of the Ford Focus SVT
All the current clamor for the Euro Focus is reminiscent of the happenings nearly a decade ago. Ford's Escort had quite run its course with a third and final design refreshing having hit the streets in 1997. The very next year, an actual small-car contender wearing the Blue Oval launched in Europe. It was capable, well turned out, and wore Ford's sharp New Edge sheetmetal. American customers took one look at the Escort ZX2, which was supposed to fill the shoes of the Escort GT and kick it against the GTI, Civic Si, and others, and decided that it just wouldn't do, decent performance or not. Much like the current U.S.-Focus versus Euro C1 Focus debate, buyers set their gaze across the Atlantic and decreed the grass greener than the warmed over Mazda B platform ZX2.
While the Escort was yanked off the stage with a hook to make room for the Focus in 2000, the ZX2 remained on sale until 2003. The SVT team's masterful reworking of the basic Focus into a real contender for the hot hatch cage match dropped in 2002 and emptied whatever air was left in the final Escort derivative's balloon.

Already established as a phenom in Europe, the Focus hit U.S. streets causing double takes and craning necks, even in base form. The shape was edgy and wedgy, or at least as wedgy as a hatchback can be. Wearing the new "New Edge" idiom, Ford owners no longer had to hang their heads in shame when parking next to a GTI. The SVT version was tarted up with a mean looking bodykit that included new bumper fascias front and rear, 17-inch rims, rocker extensions, and of course, a blattier exhaust tip.


The ZX2 hasn't managed to earn the hushed, reverent tones that people use when speaking of the Focus SVT, and while a regular Focus was marginally outperformed by the ZX2, the SVT was no chump. The 2000cc Zetec went off to Cosworth for finishing school. Cosworth often means "new cylinder head," and that's what it meant for the Zetec. Feeding the newly enlarged ports was a two stage intake, and a header was fitted on the other side to increase exhalation. Variable camshaft timing also aided the Zetec in making the most of its newly found deep-breathing prowess. In the lower end, Cosworth changed the pistons and connecting rods to heavier duty units, while also bumping the compression ratio to 10.2:1 and adding oil squirters for temperature stability with the relatively high level of squeeze. Engine tweaks were good for a substantial 40-hp gain to 170.

Gearchanges were handled by a Getrag unit sporting six ratios, all necessary to keep the newly-peaky Zetec on boil. While Cosworth transformed the standard Focus four-cylinder into a revver with most of its punch delivered north of 5,000 rpm, it also made the engine smoother than the workaday growler it had been. Some complaints about engine revs hanging and dashing hopes of snick-quick gearchanges in the heat of battles have been registered; possibly some emissions-compliance air-bleed weirdness that drives us nutty in many cars.

One of the best things about the Focus SVT was that underneath it all, it was a Focus. The interior was surprisingly adept at swallowing way more than you would think possible, especially with the rear seats folded, and normal sized people fit well, also. A five-door SVT model was even added in 2003 to expand the car's usability. The edgy exterior styling also meandered inside to the dashboard, with joyously simple ergonomics spiced up with some cut-line busyness.
Perhaps the fact that we're still rocking this basic platform in 2008 is a testament to the baked-in goodness that Ford bestowed upon its first generation Focus, and indeed, the SVT won praise back in the day for its structural solidity. That tight bodyshell allowed the suspension to do the twin jobs of absorbing irregularities while also clinging to the tarmac. Not all cars can do both well, trading suppleness for tenacity in the turns, but the SVT struck an everyday comfortable balance. Body roll might be slightly more than desirable, but it's a tradeoff your kidneys will thank you for making.


Nobody bought an SVT by mistake, and it's a vehicle that will command a premium over its lesser brethren. Finding an unmolested example may also be increasingly difficult as SVTs are swimming in sub-$10,000 territory now, making them a starter car for sideways-hat wearing numbskulls who'll roast the clutch right out of its home in the dual-mass flywheel in no time flat. The highest premium will be paid for the 2003/04 Focus SVT with the European Appearance Package. The EAP added full leather seats from Recaro, 15-spoke dark metal wheels, standard HID headlamps and was available in two new colors, Screamin' Yellow and Competition Orange.
If rowing the shifter and peaky power delivery aren't exactly your thing, you could always seek out the ZX4 ST with which Ford followed up the Focus SVT. It's more torquey, a little more relaxed in its demeanor, but no less enjoyable, if slightly less sporty. Take one look at the current Focus, and the first-generation is classic in the way it shifted Ford's small car line away from the moribund Escort and has been eclipsed by a much more strangely styled SVT-less replacement. Besides that, trendsetter Neff wants one.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Throwback @ Jul 21st 2008 12:06PM
It was also available as a four door for one model year. Those are rare.
EndlessMike @ Jul 21st 2008 12:46PM
No there wasn't. Three doors were available all three years, and five doors in 2003-04. The later four door Focus ST is not the same car at all other than chassis.
I do so love my silver on red 02 (rarest color combination for 02!). :)
That One Person @ Jul 21st 2008 2:42PM
Mike...the ST also had some of the same suspension components as the SVT and also shared to same brakes.
It also came with a 151hp 2.3L four banger which made it just as quick as the SVT.
It didn't handle as tightly as the SVT but it was a pretty good performer.
Sad that Ford dropped that combo (both the ST and SVT).
BlackCanary @ Jul 21st 2008 12:08PM
Just when it looked like Ford was turning the corner. I really liked this car but never really took to the dash. Always disliked the vents being uneven. Very nice other than that little quible.
Jeff @ Jul 21st 2008 12:10PM
Poor man's Porsche is what I've always said.
By the way, there is an inaccuracy I believe: "Engine tweaks were good for a substantial 50-hp gain to 170."
The base Zetec is 130-hp, so the increase was only 40-hp. Torque saw an increase of 15 ft-lbs I think, 130-->145.
Jeff @ Jul 21st 2008 12:12PM
Sorry, the Torque went from 135 --> 145. Not from 130.
big jim slade @ Jul 21st 2008 3:28PM
I hope you're joking. A FWD hatchback is not going to be mistaken for a Porsche. You must own a Focus...
Considering its faster, more powerful, handles much, much, much better and has a boxer engine, a WRX would be about as close as you're going to get to a poor man's Porsche. Even an old MR2 would seem to be a better choice than the Focus.
Heck, look at Stig's time with the new 08 WRX STI and notice several Porches with slower lap times. Though, a 911 GT3 did manage to get a one second quicker lap time than the STI.
Not bad for a $100,000+ car, I guess...
Jeff @ Jul 21st 2008 6:29PM
My comment is based on the handling characteristics of the car, nothing more. Considering that the SVT Focus could out handle a base Porsche in the slalom, I think the statement has validity.
Chris @ Jul 21st 2008 10:08PM
To the guy who said a WRX could outhandle an SVT Focus...
You're definitely high.
Go check the car mags and get back to us.
Vintage @ Jul 21st 2008 12:12PM
It was also decimated by the SRT4, who made the SVT focus seem like a girl's car, in terms of performance.
Shipey @ Jul 21st 2008 12:22PM
Nothing says "girl's car" like a Neon badge and a 2ft tall wing.
I like the SRT4 as well, but take the forced induction off the SRT4 and see what happens.
This was a hot N/A 4 banger, no doubt about it.
It was fast, nimble, and had reserved style. It's a much more mature take on the pocket rocket than the SRT4, imo.
Ken Stamper @ Jul 21st 2008 12:28PM
Cheaper than cheap interior, bland exterior, all the chassis sophistication of my Dad's John Deere... faster or not, there's a reason we're talking about the Focus and not the Neon.
416Hammy @ Jul 21st 2008 12:30PM
At least you have Ford owners admitting what they drive is a hopped-up Focus, instead of the whining you hear from SRT-4 drivers...
"It's not a Neon, yo!!! It's an SRT-4!!!!!!!!!!!!11111oneoneone"
why not the LS2LS7? @ Jul 21st 2008 12:33PM
I agree, but the SVT led by a years, so it had some time to sell. It was more competing with the Civic Si than the SRT4, Mazdaspeed3, Cobalt SS or other massively overpowered small cars.
The only lasting cool thing about the SVT Focus was that the transmission had two output shafts to save space and squeeze in 6 gears (something I don't know the SRT4 ever got).
http://www.escortfocus.com/html/ford_focus_svt.html
Dazza @ Jul 21st 2008 12:43PM
The Neon's chassis dynamics wee no match for those of the Focus, regardless of the engine lumped under the bonnet.
The mk1 Focus was a brilliant car to throw around country lanes with adverse camber, particularly the high-performance versions.
Bruxell @ Jul 21st 2008 1:15PM
The SRT4 also made the Focus feel like a properly designed car with a chassis capable of deploying the power in something other than a straight line. I've driven the Neon, it's quick, but it has terribble steering, and it feels like it's built from paper mache. The only ccar in this market segment at the time the SVT was out that felt nearly as good to drive was the Mazdaspeed Protege. That car though had a weird feel to the power steering as if assist was being used to compensate for stiction in the system.
PJ @ Jul 21st 2008 1:19PM
+1. The SRT4 is a teenager's car. The SVT Focus--and no offense, guys--has that rare depth of quality that keeps cars satisfying after you get outgrow 0-100-0.
Fantastically meaty and precise steering, a smooth engine that begged for 7000+ rpm, a superb ride-and-handling balance, and a roomier, higher-quality interior than most compacts had at the time. The chair-height driving position was the main thing that drove me into an NB Miata instead.
Definitely a future classic.
Cornholio @ Jul 21st 2008 1:26PM
It's not all about straight line performance. The SVT Focus is the complete package drivers car the pumped up Neon could never hope to be....
KT @ Jul 21st 2008 12:21PM
I had an '03 5door (sonic blue) and loved it. All it needed was some low end grunt and it would've been perfect. I was considering the Jackson Racing SC but life got in the way and I had to sell the non-essential (toy).
I've been considering getting another but most are either ragged out or have terrible body work.
geo.stewart @ Jul 21st 2008 12:24PM
get a protege5. easier to find a good example