Filed under: Etc., Government/Legal, Safety
A gentler tap - IIHS suggests car bumper standards for light trucks
It's not a surprise that the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) would be backing a proposal that has the potential to lower the amount of damage vehicles sustain in crashes, and therefore lead to less costly repairs for insurers. What is surprising is the NHTSA's stubborn attitude about accepting outside suggestions. The proposal is simple enough; the IIHS recommends that trucks and cars use the same bumper standards for greater crash compatibility. Being cynical and following the money does lead one back to the fact that such a change would save the insurance industry a large sum, but so what? Saving the insurance industry money saves us poor saps a few nickels, too – or the rates continue to be just as expensive while the corporate robber barons pocket the increased profits. NHTSA has heard this argument before, rejecting petitions for porting the car bumper standard to light trucks in both 1984 and 1991. The IIHS is hoping that this time around, the fact that it's an organization proposing the change, and their new research, will sway the regulatory body in a more favorable direction. The IIHS used the Ford Explorer and its more car-compatible bumpers to demonstrate in tests that both vehicles in a crash would sustain less damage without exacting any penalty in usefulness or capability. NHTSA is already on the case of vehicle compatibility in a broad sense, and will likely try to roll any bumper-centric work into that effort. It would seem like a no-brainer to have cars and light trucks with bumpers that match up, but it's taken the past century of automotive production and dependence to get the idea any kind of traction. With that kind of glacial pace, we should start petitioning now in anticipation of a super-tight oil supply and incoming waves of sub-A class vehicles. We sure wouldn't want to get mauled by an Explorer on our way to get milk and bread in our Nano in 2030. IIHS Press Release after the jump.
PRESS RELEASE
Federal bumper rules should apply to SUVs, pickups, vans, and cars alike
ARLINGTON, VA - Cars, SUVs, and pickups share the road but they don't share the same standard for bumpers. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has petitioned the federal government to regulate the bumpers on light trucks (SUVs, pickups, and vans) just as it regulates those on cars. The same bumper rules should apply to all kinds of passenger vehicles.
To meet federal rules, car bumpers must be 16 to 20 inches off the ground and limit the amount of damage that can be sustained in a low-speed crash. The idea is to ensure that the bumpers on colliding cars engage, absorbing most of the energy of the impact and keeping damage away from expensive-to-repair parts like fenders, grilles, headlights, and taillights.
Car bumper rules don't apply to light trucks. In fact, it's still legal to sell these vehicles without any bumpers at all. Federal regulators' longstanding thinking is that requiring light trucks to have bumpers would compromise off-road navigation and make it hard to use these vehicles at loading ramps. The Institute counters that putting damage-resistant bumpers on light trucks needn't compromise utility.
New SUV-to-car crash test results: A series of low-speed crash tests shows why. The Institute details the results in its petition to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The tests involved 4 midsize SUVs striking the back of a typical midsize car at 10 miles per hour. One of the SUVS - a Ford Explorer - does a better job than 3 others (Hummer H3, Jeep Grand Cherokee, and Mitsubishi Endeavor) of resisting damage in low-speed crashes and minimizing damage to the vehicles with which it collides.
"One big difference is that the Explorer's bumpers line up pretty well with those on cars, so when this SUV hits a car or a car hits it, the bumpers on both vehicles engage instead of over- and underriding each other," says Institute president Adrian Lund. Once engaged, the bumpers absorb a lot of energy, protecting the vehicles from expensive-to-repair damage to safety-related parts and sheet metal.
"When cars collide with other cars, their bumpers usually line up pretty well," Lund notes. "But in SUV-to-car crashes, the bumpers often don't match up at all, and the result is thousands of dollars of unnecessary damage in low-speed crashes."
The front bumpers on the H3, Grand Cherokee, and Endeavor are so high that they overrode the rear bumpers of the stationary Hyundai Sonatas in the Institute tests. Damage to the Sonatas ranged from $3,891 to $4,737. Even the SUVs sustained more than $1,000 damage each. In contrast, the Explorer sustained less than $1,000 damage in the same front-into-rear test, and it inflicted only about one-third as much damage on the Sonata as the worst performer among the 4 SUVs, the H3.
Experience in real-world crashes is consistent. The 3 poor-performing SUVs had some of the highest insurance losses under property damage liability coverage during 2005-07. That is, they inflicted excess damage on the vehicles with which they collided. The Explorer had lower-than-average losses under the same insurance coverage during the same years.
Utility versus bumper height: "There's no evidence that the relatively effective bumpers on the Ford Explorer compromise its off-road performance or its utility at loading ramps," Lund says. "The Explorer shows that you can still have the utility of an SUV without making bumpers so high that they don't line up with cars."
In fact, light trucks in the 1970-80s had lower bumpers - 19 inches or less - than many of today's models, and they still were used off-road and at loading ramps. Many of today's light truck bumpers measure more than 20 inches tall.
"It's only an inch or so of difference in bumper height," Lund points out, "but it's an important inch when you consider that car bumper heights have to be 16 to 20 inches from the ground. That's the federal rule, so anything taller than 20 inches won't line up with a car bumper - and most light truck bumpers today don't."
No more excuses: At the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's own behest, automakers have been working since 2003 to improve the compatibility between cars and light trucks in front and side collisions that occur at higher speeds. Many light trucks already meet the design criteria the manufacturers agreed on to reduce injuries to people in cars struck by the heavier, higher riding passenger vehicles. All light trucks built after Sept. 1, 2009, will meet the criteria to improve vehicle compatibility in serious crashes. Addressing bumper mismatch would help this effort.
"It's a win-win," Lund says. "One program would complement the other, and the result could be to improve both occupant protection in high-speed crashes and resistance to vehicle damage in collisions at slower speeds. All the agency has to do is regulate light truck bumpers."
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Vintage 3:31PM (7/01/2008)
DUH! This is one of the many reasons I can't stand SUVs.
Reply
Eddy Alvarez 3:45PM (7/01/2008)
man, i've always wanted to know what those little vents are for at the back of cars under the body work? (the ones you can see on the cars in the picture)
Reply
Vintage 3:49PM (7/01/2008)
They're for trunk ventilation, to let moisture and humidity out of the vehicle. The air flow is through the HVAC system, into the passenger compartment, into the trunk, then out of the vehicle. This prevents positive pressure buildup, and keeps your windows from popping out.
Eddy Alvarez 3:54PM (7/01/2008)
lol thank you so much! that makes so much sense
i have oft wondered why there was no positive pressure from hvac. very very interesting. thanks again.
ehisforadam 4:23PM (7/01/2008)
They also releave pressure when you close the door of your car. You can hear them on some cars. If you didn't have them the windows would blow out on your car. Especially a lot of newer cars, because they're sealed so well.
Gardiner Westbound 3:50PM (7/01/2008)
Until the 1960s car bumpers were strong enough to permit cars to push each other without damage. A grocery cart rolling into a modern bumper will inflict several hundred dollars damage. The insurance cartel's infinite ability to increase premiums and deductibles renders it immune from the results of its self-serving handiwork.
It’s crap! This is being driven by the insurance cartel and its safety industry partners. Profits are so minuscule insurance companies own most 30-story commercial buildings. Things are so tight rates have increased several times and policyholders are punished for reporting insured fender benders. But insurers never make any money, and amazingly never go out of business.
Over several decades the insurance thieves have dictated major design and equipment changes adding thousands to the cost of buying and owning a car, and increased the inconvenience and expense of licensing. These include safety glass, seat belts, 5-mph bumpers, air bags, steering column locks, lower speed limits, higher fines, increased point levies, stricter impaired driving laws, and graduated licensing; each promising a 10 to 30-percent reduction in injuries and fatalities and lower insurance premiums - that never materialize.
If even a small proportion of these assurances were borne out cars would be safer than churches and auto insurance would be a fraction of the sum extorted from the public with government connivance.
Reply
Dan 3:57PM (7/01/2008)
It's not that those changes haven't saved consumers big money - it just doesn't show up on your premiums because those savings are cancelled out by the skyrocketing cost of medical treatment.
It's depressing to see how even the most effective, compatible bumper height height combination inflicted $2000 in damage between the vehicles.
Disgruntled Goat 3:51PM (7/01/2008)
You would think this would be common sense but oh well.
Reply
Alex 4:02PM (7/01/2008)
I'm not an SUV hater, don't really care what other people drive but the unequal height of the bumpers is my one huge gripe about them. Living in the city of Chicago where the Braille method of parallel parking is preferred I've replaced one grill and have scratches on the upper portion of my front and rear bumpers from SUVs attempting to park near my car. This article wrongly suggests the benefactor is the insurance companies when in fact it’s the car owner because much of the damage caused isn't worth paying a deductible to be fixed yet its still visible and really annoying. Personally after they get this passed I think their next cause should be requiring front license plate holders with bolts that don't scratch or pierce painted plastic bumpers, my other gripe.
Reply
mroverlord 7:41PM (7/01/2008)
Go get yourself a small truck, then equip it with Road Armor bumpers, and you can be pretty sure no one is going to use braille parking on your vehicle. If they do, they will suffer the consequenses.
Hamud 4:12PM (7/01/2008)
That makes a lot of sense, thx Vintage.
About the bumpers, it seems logic to me. But what if the owner decides to lower/rise the car, change the suspension/tires and/or wheels???
Reply
Rick 4:35PM (7/01/2008)
Going down is not an issue. Most lowering kits keep it practical, at 1-2 inches or so. Going up is the issue. Some people feel the need to take real time air samples of the stratosphere. Of course their vehicle's aerodynamics (think gas usage) and handling go to hell in the process. On the other hand, I though federal bumper height regulations didn't apply to trucks and suvs, because they're 'work vehicles.'
Jason 5:01PM (7/01/2008)
Rick, most states have regulations restricting either bumper height or headlight height which apply to trucks and SUVs.
If they were serious about wanting to reduce their payout costs, they'd mandate we call go back to non-integrated metal (or plastic) bumpers like we had in the 70s and before, so that a
Jason 5:03PM (7/01/2008)
that's odd, looks like my comment got cut short somehow... anyway, to finish.
If they were serious about wanting to reduce their payout costs, they'd mandate we call go back to non-integrated metal (or plastic) bumpers like we had in the 70s and before, so that a
Hamud 4:23PM (7/01/2008)
Weird, my post disappeared.
Posting again.
That makes a lot of sense, thx Vintage.
About the bumpers, it seems logic to me. But what if the owner decides to lower/rise the car, change the suspension/tires and/or wheels???
Reply
Jason 5:04PM (7/01/2008)
3rd times the charm? stupid special characters...
If they were serious about wanting to reduce their payout costs, they'd mandate we call go back to non-integrated metal (or plastic) bumpers like we had in the 70s and before, so that a 5mph bump no longer racks up $5K in damage when a small hit to the bumper in turn damages the fenders, lights, grille and just about everything else on the front or rear end of a car.
Reply
mr.ed 5:16PM (7/01/2008)
Truck bumpers never had to comply with the kind of standards, however skimpy the cars had to. They're a joke, but can do some damage to fragile plastic bits if higher than car bumpers. The biggest insult is SUV's with spares on the tailgate, and negative bumpers underneath. Back into a building, and see a couple grand disappear!
Reply
notYou 5:51PM (7/01/2008)
"while the corporate robber barons pocket the increased profits."
I love how "pocketing" (read: earning) "increased profits" is now equivalent to "robbing".
Yes, I hate insurance costs as much as the next person (especially considering I've never had an accident [knock on wood!]) but if the insurance companies come up with some sort of efficiency (like this) and keep the difference, more power to them. If they manage to increase efficiency such that costs are reduced by 1% and they don't pass that along either, are they still robbing you?
Because eventually in a free market, some entrepreneur is going to see that retained profit as an exploitable opportunity and pass it along to consumers themselves, thus creating a cheaper alternative and -viola!- competition. That's why consumers price shop insurance.
Reply
Cole 6:08PM (7/01/2008)
Insurance rates are set by your individual states Dept of Insurance. The carriers cannot charge whatever they want. Robber Barons... these are publicly traded companies! You want cheap rates? Get a Buick... trust me!
Reply
Philip 7:24PM (7/01/2008)
All bumpers need to be the same height from the ground, its the best for everyone.
Reply