Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.












Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadAcura TSX named Top Safety Pick by IIHS
(Page 1 of 1)
Johnny @ Jun 23rd 2008 4:40PM
I agree. Lets have 4 tests. 50 mph frontal, 50mph rear, 40 mph side impact and roll the car down a hill 3 times and see if the roof caves in or not and if the passengers would survive.
done.
boneheadotto @ Jun 23rd 2008 5:31PM
To me the big problem with these tests is that they dont consistently test every car. There are so many cars out there that dont have test results which blows my mind. AND some of the tests are different per car. The IIHS is the only one that tests rear impact. The 5 star gov system does not rate rear impact from behind (they do side but not rear). But then the IIHS rear test is only at 20mph with a car of the SAME WEIGHT! So the smart is tested with a sled hitting the back of it that is the same weight. The Honda FIT was hit with a sled of the same weight at 20mph and it tested POOR!!! unbeleivable!! So with those tests results i would hate to see what happens to the back seat passengers when a Ford F150 rearends you going only 40mph!!!