With gas prices soaring and SUV sales sinking, General Motors just put its HUMMER brand under "strategic review." That's generally the term used when a company is getting ready to dump a brand. And that begs the question, how many brands does a car company really need?There are a number of companies that have multiple brands, like GM (Chevrolet, Pontiac, Buick, Cadillac, GMC, Saab, Saturn, Opel, Holden, Vauxhaul), Ford (Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Volvo), Fiat (Fiat, Alfa Romeo, Lancia, Ferrari, Maserati) and Volkswagen (VW, Audi, Seat, Skoda, Lamborghini, Bentley, Bugatti). Some of these brands are strong and successful. Some are not.
The big, successful automakers these days seem to have only two brands, a mass market brand and a luxury one. That's the model Toyota, Honda, and Nissan are following. And that sure seems to be the business model that will work best for the foreseeable future.
John McElroy is host of the TV program "Autoline Detroit". Every week he brings his unique insights as an auto industry insider to Autoblog readers. Follow the jump to continue reading this week's editorial.
Of course, it wasn't always that way. There was a time in the not too distant past when multiple brands allowed an automaker to increase its market share and its economies of scale. But today that business model doesn't look nearly as attractive. Here's why.

Back when car companies pretty much operated in their country of origin and there wasn't much international competition, having one brand could be very limiting for a company. It could only go after one segment of the market. This is why Alfred Sloan built up GM's portfolio of brands under the motto, "A car for every purse and purpose." The idea was to start customers with an entry level Chevrolet, then move them up the price scale to the next brand on the ladder, to Pontiac, then Oldsmobile or Buick, and ultimately to Cadillac.
It was a strategy that worked brilliantly for nearly half a century. But the strategy fell apart, at least for GM, when automotive trade became really big on a global basis.
Until then, GM's portfolio of brands gave it the greatest economies of scale of any automaker. But when companies like Toyota and Honda were able to expand their sales to many markets in the world, they were able to offset GM's advantage. They could make Corollas and Civics in huge numbers and sell them everywhere.
Of course, GM could have done the same. But it ran, and pretty much continues to run, its operations on a regional basis. Europe's Opel never wanted an American Chevrolet, and visa versa. In South America, GM's Brazilian and Argentine operations had almost no product overlap. Holden in Australia was literally in a world of its own. And so it went. The company never achieved global economies of scale, though it's now working feverishly to try to get there by sharing platforms and powertrains.
Toyota can pour all of its development and marketing money into two brands (I'm ignoring Scion for the moment since it only exists in the U.S. market). Every year the company comes out with about four new or significantly refreshed Toyotas and about three new Lexus models. How can a Chevrolet or a Cadillac compete when they each come out with maybe one new model a year?
Japanese automakers do have a myriad of brands in their home market. But the brand differences are all in the badges. And Japan is a closed market for all practical purposes, which allows its automakers to get away with practices they couldn't replicate elsewhere.
Unless the cost of developing and marketing separate models for multiple brands is offset by higher profit margins, automakers with multiple brands are at a disadvantage.
That's why GM will likely kill off HUMMER, and why Pontiac and Buick could end up on the endangered species list. It's why Ford will kill Mercury and sell Volvo. And it makes me wonder how long VW will be able to maintain such a large portfolio.
Autoline Detroit
Airs every Sunday at 7:00AM on Speed and 10:30AM on Detroit Public Television.
Autoline Detroit Podcast
Click here to subscribe in iTunes
Last week's show: "Inside Mazda" (click to view)











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Johnny @ Jun 19th 2008 7:38PM
We dont need to go from 10 to 2 but a trimming to 5 would be nice
Now:
Chevrolet, Pontiac, Buick, Cadillac, GMC, Saab, Saturn, Opel, Holden, Vauxhaul
Becomes:
Chevrolet, Buick, Cadillac, Holden, Opel
By selling SAAB back to people that can run it properly in Sweden, By joining Vauxhaul with Opel, Brining Pontiac and GMC into Chevrolet and dumping Hummer.
Dean @ Jun 19th 2008 7:57PM
u forgot saturn
Aprime @ Jun 19th 2008 8:58PM
I'm SURE they can turn Saab around in a proper manner.
GMC has too much brand... The word escapes me, I think it's brand cache or something, regardless, it's on the same level as Chevrolet in people's mind. It should be the utility brand IMO, not being limited to trucks but anything capable to haul or move stuff around, namely the Vibe.
Pontiac needs not to stray away from the performance image, even in today's world.
I'm also favoring the launch of 3 categories of GM 'stores'.
A Regular GM store would hold: Buicks, Chevies, Pontiacs and GMCs, meaning you'll be eliminating the 'we need a vehicle for X puprose' issue that's partly being the cause of badge engineering (there shouldn't be 4 lambdas).
There would be the Euro stores, carrying Saturn/Opel and SAAB.
And finally the Cadillac store. Why Cadillac alone? Well, I know Smarts are being sold alongside MBs here and Minis along BMWs, but usually those are 'secluded' from the rest of the showrooms. I guess we could be making some exceptions but I don't think having Cadillac attached to anything else is that great of an idea.
Having a multitude of brands isn't an issue, it's how you sell their products that is, and marketing (I'm not just talking about ads here) has been a key issue with GM for the last decade or so.
Aprime @ Jun 19th 2008 9:00PM
I'm SURE they can turn Saab around in a proper manner.
GMC has too much brand... The word escapes me, I think it's brand cache or something, regardless, it's on the same level as Chevrolet in people's mind. It should be the utility brand IMO, not being limited to trucks but anything capable to haul or move stuff around, namely the Vibe.
Pontiac needs not to stray away from the performance image, even in today's world.
I'm also favoring the launch of 3 categories of GM 'stores'.
A Regular GM store would hold: Buicks, Chevies, Pontiacs and GMCs, meaning you'll be eliminating the 'we need a vehicle for X puprose' issue that's partly being the cause of badge engineering (there shouldn't be 4 lambdas).
There would be the Euro stores, carrying Saturn/Opel and SAAB.
And finally the Cadillac store. Why Cadillac alone? Well, I know Smarts are being sold alongside MBs here and Minis along BMWs, but usually those are 'secluded' from the rest of the showrooms. I guess we could be making some exceptions but I don't think having Cadillac attached to anything else is that great of an idea.
As for Hummer? I've discussed this one several times, you will not be able to succesfully turn it into a Jeep competitor (for the sheer reason that THEY SHARE THE SAME ROOTS, making it a spinoff brand and that never really goes well - they could also use the war heritage, but... That would be plain stupid with the wars it fought in) for a number of reasons and going after the likes of Land Rover is pretty stupid.
Having a multitude of brands isn't an issue, it's how you sell their products that is, and marketing (I'm not just talking about ads here) has been a key issue with GM for the last decade or so.
Ethan @ Jun 19th 2008 9:13PM
@Dean: I think he meant combine Saturn, Opel, and Vauxhall. Except for the RHD/LHD thing, and the Outlook which is US-only, the cars are almost exactly, if not completely, the same.
Torrent @ Jun 20th 2008 4:11AM
What about Saturn?
John Metcalf @ Jun 19th 2008 8:13PM
John forgot Toyota's k-car division Daihatsu.
Aprime @ Jun 19th 2008 8:50PM
KEI, K-cars = Chrysler thing.
Brad Kempeny @ Jun 19th 2008 9:44PM
Also, Toyota's Hino HD truck business.
Mobius_1 @ Jun 19th 2008 10:24PM
And Toyota owns Subaru as well, that's another brand
But yes, most of the US car makers have way to many brands, and many products overlap which is a waste of their already limited cash flow recently and should really just focus more on making fewer cars to fill the profitable niches and make them BETTER
mikomi @ Jun 20th 2008 10:15AM
Toyota doesn't own Subaru outright, they own shares of Subaru's parent company, Fuji Heavy Industries, but enough to have some say in things. Not sure if that counts as being a Toyota brand.
Toyota certainly has more than 2 brands. But if you look closely at each brand, there's not that much overlap between them and they don't cannibalize each other (as much), a problem that's much more apparent with other manufacturers.
Too many brands is not a problem, it's the homogenization of the brands.
Guticb @ Jun 19th 2008 8:13PM
VW will survive for a very long time. VAG (Volkswagen Auto Group) owns those brands that do very well in Europe. In fact VAG completely DOMINATES Europe and has for a while. Not only that, but VAG's sales are rising in Europe every year.
It's because they're so diverse, that they can easily afford the massive amount that the Veyron will lose them. Volkswagen has at least 10 different Golfs in Europe while there's only 2 in the US. They range from a 12,000 Euro one all the way up to the 30,000 Euro mark. They have something for everyone, which is why they do so well there, but not here.
VW of America isn't doing so well, but VW overall is doing great.
compliance @ Jun 19th 2008 8:18PM
Toyota has 3 brands, and is about to spin off the Prius line for a 4th.
GoatCarcass @ Jun 19th 2008 8:33PM
and Scion...
Eek @ Jun 19th 2008 8:44PM
And Scion what? And Scion as in you forgot to mention it? Even though he states that he is ignoring it since it is only an American brand? Or do you mean "And Scion" as it should be cut? In which case, I agree.
cameron42985 @ Jun 19th 2008 9:21PM
Eek, to suggest that Toyota has only two brands because Scion isn't offered abroad is stupid. What would that make Ford if we didn't mention their NA-exclusive brands? A two-badge Automaker? Seems to conflict with the whole point of the blog.
Oh, yeah 'And Scion'.
chris.vierling @ Jun 19th 2008 8:34PM
and Scion...
Jordan @ Jun 19th 2008 8:43PM
and Scion...
Steve @ Jun 19th 2008 8:44PM
and Scion...
MajorGeek @ Jun 19th 2008 9:10PM
and Scion...