Autoline on Autoblog with John McElroy
FORD'S AMBITIOUS MAKE-OVER
It could be the most dramatic retooling effort since the early days of World War II, when Detroit earned its nick name as the Arsenal of Democracy. Word leaked out yesterday that Ford is calling its plant managers and top union leaders to the company's headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan to debrief them on an ambitious plan to revamp its manufacturing plants. Ford wants a crash program to change over many of its truck plants to produce fuel-efficient passenger cars.
The urgency conveyed by this development (the company will not yet officially confirm it) is due to the surge in gasoline and diesel prices that have decimated truck sales. Never has there been seen such a dramatic shift in customer demand in such a short period of time. Last month sales for the Detroit Three absolutely collapsed, and when sales are tallied for this month, the carnage is going to be worse.
Realizing that any delay could permanently cripple the company, Ford's CEO Alan Mullaly decided to embark on a bold effort to achieve a rapid change over. Hence, the unprecedented call to bring all the plant managers and top union reps together for an emergency meeting.
John McElroy is host of the TV program "Autoline Detroit". Every week he brings his unique insights as an auto industry insider to Autoblog readers. Follow the jump to continue reading this week's editorial.
The fastest way for Ford to revamp its North American line-up of vehicles is to tap into the fuel-efficient products it already makes overseas, particularly in Europe. But rather than import those vehicles, which would be too expensive due to the strong Euro and weak dollar, Ford wants to manufacture them in the U.S. All it has to do is duplicate the dies, fixtures, tools and jigs needed to make those cars. That still represents a massive financial commitment, but it's a lot cheaper and faster than any other alternative.

Ford already planned to build the next generation of European Focus and Mondeo models here, but undoubtedly it's looking at other products, as well. The Kuga and S-Max would seem to be logical candidates, and possibly the Fusion (which bears no resemblance to the Fusion sold in North America). There are also plans to drop the Econoline van altogether and replace it with the Transit.
The big challenge Ford faces is sourcing all the parts and components it needs to make those vehicles in North America. It simply won't do to import those parts from Europe, as that would be too expensive. So it has to make them here, which is going to be a bonanza for suppliers who already produce parts for those vehicles. They're going to see their volumes soar, which means both they, and Ford, will achieve greater economies of scale.
But at the same time it will be a catastrophe for those suppliers who produce parts for the trucks and SUVs that are going to get cut. Moreover, this change will undoubtedly lead to new cuts in the design and engineering staffs in Dearborn who were working on those vehicles.
Ford isn't going to drop all its trucks and SUVs. The Explorer will be redesigned as a unit-body vehicle in 2010. The company is also working on a smaller, lighter body-on-frame program for future pick-ups and SUVs. It will even revive the F-100 nameplate for this smaller pick-up. But the plan is clear, Ford must re-tool its entire line-up as fast as it can to deal with surging fuel prices.
This sounds very reminiscent of the war-time conversion effort that Detroit went through in early 1942, when peace-time production of automobiles came to a screeching halt and factories were quickly retooled to produce military material. But most people are unaware that the planning for that conversion had been in the works for years. Billy Mitchell, the famous bomber pilot, was assigned to Detroit to help the auto industry lay the groundwork for conversion as early as 1939. So when the U.S. finally entered the war, it all went very quickly.
But the effort wasn't without its problems. There were all kinds of problems with corruption and cost overruns. Indeed, then-Senator Harry Truman made quite a name for himself running around the country exposing waste and mismanagement.
There's a great story involving him and the Ford Motor Company. The company was building the Willow Run plant to make B-24 bombers and so much was going wrong early on that the plant actually earned the nick name Willit Run?
Truman got whiff of a rumor that the bathrooms in the plant were all made of marble and, outraged at the extravagance, he flew to Detroit to personally investigate the situation. On the way in to the factory he asked his driver about the rumors. "Oh it's true, Mr. Truman," the driver reportedly told him. "We need every scrap of wood and metal for the war effort, but we don't need marble and that's why we used it in the bathrooms."
"Well, then you turn this car right around and take me back to my airplane," Truman is said to have told the driver, "I just learned everything I need to know."
Autoline Detroit
Airs every Sunday at 7:00AM on Speed and 10:30AM on Detroit Public Television.
Autoline Detroit Podcast
Click here to subscribe in iTunes
Last week's show: "DNA"
It could be the most dramatic retooling effort since the early days of World War II, when Detroit earned its nick name as the Arsenal of Democracy. Word leaked out yesterday that Ford is calling its plant managers and top union leaders to the company's headquarters in Dearborn, Michigan to debrief them on an ambitious plan to revamp its manufacturing plants. Ford wants a crash program to change over many of its truck plants to produce fuel-efficient passenger cars.The urgency conveyed by this development (the company will not yet officially confirm it) is due to the surge in gasoline and diesel prices that have decimated truck sales. Never has there been seen such a dramatic shift in customer demand in such a short period of time. Last month sales for the Detroit Three absolutely collapsed, and when sales are tallied for this month, the carnage is going to be worse.
Realizing that any delay could permanently cripple the company, Ford's CEO Alan Mullaly decided to embark on a bold effort to achieve a rapid change over. Hence, the unprecedented call to bring all the plant managers and top union reps together for an emergency meeting.
John McElroy is host of the TV program "Autoline Detroit". Every week he brings his unique insights as an auto industry insider to Autoblog readers. Follow the jump to continue reading this week's editorial.
The fastest way for Ford to revamp its North American line-up of vehicles is to tap into the fuel-efficient products it already makes overseas, particularly in Europe. But rather than import those vehicles, which would be too expensive due to the strong Euro and weak dollar, Ford wants to manufacture them in the U.S. All it has to do is duplicate the dies, fixtures, tools and jigs needed to make those cars. That still represents a massive financial commitment, but it's a lot cheaper and faster than any other alternative.

Ford already planned to build the next generation of European Focus and Mondeo models here, but undoubtedly it's looking at other products, as well. The Kuga and S-Max would seem to be logical candidates, and possibly the Fusion (which bears no resemblance to the Fusion sold in North America). There are also plans to drop the Econoline van altogether and replace it with the Transit.
Gallery: 2008 Ford Mondeo
The big challenge Ford faces is sourcing all the parts and components it needs to make those vehicles in North America. It simply won't do to import those parts from Europe, as that would be too expensive. So it has to make them here, which is going to be a bonanza for suppliers who already produce parts for those vehicles. They're going to see their volumes soar, which means both they, and Ford, will achieve greater economies of scale.
Gallery: 2008 Ford Kuga
But at the same time it will be a catastrophe for those suppliers who produce parts for the trucks and SUVs that are going to get cut. Moreover, this change will undoubtedly lead to new cuts in the design and engineering staffs in Dearborn who were working on those vehicles.
Ford isn't going to drop all its trucks and SUVs. The Explorer will be redesigned as a unit-body vehicle in 2010. The company is also working on a smaller, lighter body-on-frame program for future pick-ups and SUVs. It will even revive the F-100 nameplate for this smaller pick-up. But the plan is clear, Ford must re-tool its entire line-up as fast as it can to deal with surging fuel prices.
This sounds very reminiscent of the war-time conversion effort that Detroit went through in early 1942, when peace-time production of automobiles came to a screeching halt and factories were quickly retooled to produce military material. But most people are unaware that the planning for that conversion had been in the works for years. Billy Mitchell, the famous bomber pilot, was assigned to Detroit to help the auto industry lay the groundwork for conversion as early as 1939. So when the U.S. finally entered the war, it all went very quickly.
But the effort wasn't without its problems. There were all kinds of problems with corruption and cost overruns. Indeed, then-Senator Harry Truman made quite a name for himself running around the country exposing waste and mismanagement.
There's a great story involving him and the Ford Motor Company. The company was building the Willow Run plant to make B-24 bombers and so much was going wrong early on that the plant actually earned the nick name Willit Run?
Truman got whiff of a rumor that the bathrooms in the plant were all made of marble and, outraged at the extravagance, he flew to Detroit to personally investigate the situation. On the way in to the factory he asked his driver about the rumors. "Oh it's true, Mr. Truman," the driver reportedly told him. "We need every scrap of wood and metal for the war effort, but we don't need marble and that's why we used it in the bathrooms."
"Well, then you turn this car right around and take me back to my airplane," Truman is said to have told the driver, "I just learned everything I need to know."
###
Autoline Detroit
Airs every Sunday at 7:00AM on Speed and 10:30AM on Detroit Public Television.
Autoline Detroit Podcast
Click here to subscribe in iTunes
Last week's show: "DNA"







Get a WordPress.com Blog




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Pete 4:34PM (6/12/2008)
Bold Moves...
Reply
info 6:25PM (6/12/2008)
"Bold moves" - which should have been done a long time ago. I guess american owned car manufacturers are destined to pay catch up because of their own short term profit (what profits?) oriented model policies.
Pacman 4:48PM (6/12/2008)
I would like to speak on the behalf of most autoblogers and say "I told you so Ford!" Finally Ford gets it that the Euro Fords are really nice and will sell well in the US and Canada.
Reply
MemphisNET 4:49PM (6/12/2008)
Kudos to Ford for at least trying very very hard to change in a timely fashion.
To those that rag on the American car companies for making SUV/Trucks their focus, just remember - we were buying them. To say they weren't making a competitive product is BS. We DEMANDED better trucks, bigger better faster more, and we got them.
Then gas goes up 30$/barrel in 2-3months...
Yes, they should have had a more balanced profile, but can we really blame them for building what the buying public wanted?
Reply
RJ 5:12PM (6/12/2008)
Still their choice for answering that demand - bad management.
Honda, Toyota, and Nissan partailly ignored that demand, and they're partially successful. (though even tundra and Titan can't escape the high gas prices)
montoym 6:16PM (6/12/2008)
@ RJ:
Yes, because it's always bad management to give your customers what they want.
That's probably one of the worst thought-out comments I've ever seen on this website, and that's saying a lot. I'm assuming that you are not a business owner? If you ever decide to own a business, we'll see how far you get with thinking like that.
So, turn the situation around. Now, customers are demanding smaller vehicles. Well, by your logic, they should ignore that because trucks and SUV's are what make them more money. Why give the customers what they are asking for right?
Plus, you kind of skimmed over the fact that Toyota, Honda, and Nissan all jumped into the full-size truck market(Honda somewhat) and that virtually all automakers also currently build SUV's. Why did they make those decisions? Because consumers were buying them, the demand was there.
info 6:24PM (6/12/2008)
TImely fashion? The model policies of the US car manufacturers are the very reason why they have continuously lost market share for the last 40+ years.
Seoultrain 7:49PM (6/12/2008)
It was a great business move for the US automakers to build SUVs. Anyone who disagrees with that has clouded judgment.
However, building SUVs wasn't Detroit's problem; relying on them was. Look at Toyota. They had tons of SUVs in their lineup, but they hedged their lineup with the consistent Corolla and Camry (bland, but consistent). When gas prices skyrocketed, Toyota had their bread and butter to fall back on. What did Detroit have? the Cobalt? Sebring? get real. Detroit lacked vision, and they're paying for it.
Also, Japanese-brand plants (including the ones in America) are more flexible and can retool to build a totally different car in a matter of days. Yes, that costs more money up front, but that investment is paying off in spades.
RJ 8:56PM (6/12/2008)
"@ RJ:
Yes, because it's always bad management to give your customers what they want."
Montoym,
Do you have the reading comprehension of a 1st grader? If you don't understand my post past the surface meaning, don't bother replying.
Let me explain it a bit better for you:
There's a HUGE difference between foolishly making what your customers consider what's "in style", without considering your own corporation's long term roadplan, and, giving what your customers want while planning ahead.
Get it now? Don't even bother becoming part of the workforce, much less start your own business.
Cire 4:50PM (6/12/2008)
Way to go Ford Corporation! As stated in the above post, you are definitely living up to your "Bold Moves" slogan!
Reply
Seoultrain 7:52PM (6/12/2008)
if the current slogan proves similarly prophetic, we may all be "Drive[-ing] One"
Joe Blow 4:52PM (6/12/2008)
It's good to see they finally got there heads out of the sand. I really hope they can pull it off.
Reply
Travis 5:04PM (6/12/2008)
so, uh, what took so long? SUV sales have been down for the past 18 months, and Ford's competitors have been bringing over cool, fuel efficient smaller cars since '02 (MINI, Scion, followed by the Fit, Yaris, Versa, etc). Why did it take this long for the people at Ford to actually DO something?
Yes, the Fiesta looks good, and it's heartening to hear that we'll be getting it here in the US (RS or SVT, PLEASE!!!!), but... 2010 is a LOOONG ways away, and a $30,000 7 person mover isn't exactly what the country needs (or wants) right now.
I do have my fingers crossed that they'll actually be able to pull this off, though.
Reply
Joe 5:35PM (6/12/2008)
It funny you would mention Fit, Yaris and not the Chevy Cobalt. The Cobalt XFE is one class larger than the Yaris and yet get the same gas mileage at 36 mpg. Wake up and start passing along real accomplishments.
Jared 5:42PM (6/12/2008)
If the Cobalt had a hatchback, wasn't so ugly, and had a quality interior then I might be interested. In the meantime, I'm waiting for the 2009 Fit.
Travis 5:45PM (6/12/2008)
do you *really* need a compliment from everyone who talks about small cars in order to make you feel justified in purchasing your car? fine, here it is:
The Cobalt is a much better car than the one it replaced. It is truly groundbreaking and innovative in it's improvements.
happy? :)
Matt 9:18PM (6/12/2008)
It's funny you mention Scion as being fuel-efficient. The tC only gets 21/29, which is considered fairly poor for it's class, and the xB only 22/28.
NikolasM 5:01PM (6/12/2008)
People bitch about regulation as something that hinders companies, but sometimes it is put there for a reason. Companies are often about the short term, government is supposed to be about long term vision. Can you imagine if the Feds had the fortitude to defy their lobbyist ma$ter$ and insist on real fuel mileage for cars? We'd have plenty of nice small cars here already, far fewer SUV's would ever have rolled off of an assembly line, and the big three wouldn't be on the ropes closing factories left and right because they put all their eggs in the 'cheap fuel forever' basket while insisting through their billions in marketing campaigns that it is America's god given right to drive the biggest cars/trucks/suv's and consume 5 times the amount of oil per capita than anyone else in the world.
Reply
Perry 5:01PM (6/12/2008)
When this Focus shows up here in Canada, I am first in line! Oh...and bring over those diesels..OK?
Reply
RSR 5:03PM (6/12/2008)
"All it has to do is duplicate the dies, fixtures, tools and jigs needed to make those cars." I think you're underestimating the engineering efforts involved. That's what Ford thought when it introduced the first gen Focus. And its initial quality was a disaster.
Many parts are designed and built by suppliers, not by Ford, and unless it's the same supplier making the parts in overseas and in NAFTA, Ford can't simply take their design and give it to another supplier here.
Reply