• Jun 9th 2008 at 1:02PM
  • 9
Click above for a high-res gallery of the Japan-spec 2008 Nissan Cube

The Nissan Cube is coming to the U.S. next Spring, and we'll get our first look at the U.S.-spec car when it makes its debut at this year's Los Angeles Auto Show. I recently had the opportunity to drive a Japanese-market edition for four days, and it's a very neat little car. Driving the JDM vehicle also illustrates how differently small Japanese cars are set up depending on their target market. Is the Cube an economy car? In Japan, it would certainly qualify, boasting a fuel economy rating of 16 km/l (some 37 mpg U.S.) according to the country's 10-15 mode test cycle. That's basically the combined cycle, and the test is done at low speeds. For Japan, where there's plenty of urban driving and road congestion, it probably serves as a fair indicator of what drivers will experience. For us, not so much. Read on after the jump.


All photos Copyright ©2008 Alex Núñez / Weblogs, Inc.

Click any image to enlarge


The tester had a 1.4L four rated at 95 horses connected to a 4-speed automatic transmission. (A 1.5L with a CVT is also available in the car's home market.) Our Cube also had e-4WD, an ingenious system that puts an electric motor on the rear axle that, when the system is active, will drive the rear wheels if additional traction is needed. The system itself can be turned on and off via a switch on the instrument panel. This approach saves weight and ensures that the Cube can keep a flat floor in the passenger and cargo areas. As I mention in the full review at Autoblog, the weather never presented a scenario where I would have benefited from turning on the e-4WD.



The Cube's final drive ratio with this particular powertrain is 4.072, clearly indicating that it's optimized for local/urban duty. In that role, it excels, accelerating briskly to around-town speeds and cruising without taxing the little four-banger underhood. Bringing it on American highways is antithetical to this role, putting a definite strain on the engine, which has to maintain steady revs in anywhere from 3,000 rpm to over 4,000 rpm to keep pace with traffic moving between 55 and 70 mph. Fuel economy takes a substantial hit as a result. As such, after four days of mixed driving, including my highway commute to work, I managed to squeeze only 22 mpg out of the engine.



And that's okay. Like I said, the JDM-spec Cube is not at all optimized for USDM-spec duty. We use our cars differently, and that's reflected in how they're equipped and tuned for our market's demands. If I had stayed local, avoiding the highway, the Cube would have clearly done better. Probably a lot better. And the eventual U.S.-market version will, too. It'll probably have some more power and better gearing (probably a CVT), and I'd hazard that we'll see an EPA fuel economy rating in the vein of the Nissan Sentra or Versa. Those numbers, incidentally, are in the same general neighborhood as what was achievable in the original Scion xB. The Cube has the same funky, import-cool vibe as Toyota's original boxy import -- something the new xB lost a bit (along with some fuel economy) when it grew from its Yaris-sourced underpinnings to the larger Corolla-based vehicle it is now.

The Cube, assuming the next car's design retains the current car's stylish charm and practicality, should be a success. If Nissan plans on selling the next-gen car in Europe, perhaps a clean, efficient diesel could enter the powertrain mix, too. Finally, if we ever get to see a Cube EV like the Denki Cube concept shown in New York this past March, well, that'd be pretty exciting. The platform is great, and the market is ripe for a neat car like this that won't kill you at the pump. If Nissan does this right and delivers a left-hand-drive Cube with highway fuel economy well into the 30s and pricing in the teens, it should be a bona-fide smash.

You can read my full review of what life with the Cube is like over at Autoblog.

Click here for translated Nissan Cube tech specs at Nissan Cube Life.




All photos Copyright ©2008 Alex Núñez / Weblogs, Inc.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 9 Comments
      • 7 Months Ago
      Yes, "Dad". Speculation based on my actual experience driving the car.
      • 7 Months Ago
      wow he was just thinking because look at the fucking thing you goofs, its not even areodynamically sound. There's a reason why he only got 22 mpg... JUST LOOK AT THE FUCKING THING ITS A CUBE FOR GODS SAKE.

      it cheats everything in the rules of aerodynamics the only benefit I see here is the actual user space available to the consumer. Im sure the car was marketed with different people in mind since I'm sure a highway commuter would surely pick a Yaris (drag .29) over this boxy trash. (i bet its drag is worse than a chevy tahoe hybrid)
      • 7 Months Ago
      Me likee. This is at the top of my list for a future purchase, along with an (older) xB or an Element. I like the idea of electronic 4WD, I've been thinking about that for a while. It's a great idea, and doesn't entail a performance or MPG hit like mechanical 4WD does (at least, when it's not being used).

      Alex, I think "Dad" was commenting on your use of very definite language for something that isn't definite. A better phrase might have been "... the Cube would probably have done much better." This way you're not asserting that it's a fact, and you don't have to worry about backing it up.

      This isn't English class, but you ARE writing professionally. Accepting valid criticism is par for the course. :)
      • 7 Months Ago
      My xB never gets less than 30mpg, even at 75-80 mph. I validate this through careful tracking of miles and fuel used. A trip yesterday to the coast and via back gravel roads and highways yielded 36mpg. My average is 32mpg.
      • 7 Months Ago
      Hopefully, Nissan will keep the AWD in the US version. My current vehicles are a Subaru Impreza and a Ford Bronco... the Bronco is a gas hog, and something like the Cube (with 4WD for snow-- we get LOTS up here in the Sierras!) would be nice alternative for a daily driver.
      • 7 Months Ago
      To bad Nissan is pulling a Toyota and making the next "cube" no so cube like. They are making it rounder and bigger. Just like the xB, which IMO is a big mistake. If the photos that have been popping up are correct. I will not be interested. If we could get this car styled like the current model here. I'd buy one in an instant.
      • 7 Months Ago
      The boxy shape surely plays a part, especially at higher speeds, but it doesn't explain the 30+ MPG the 1st generation Scion xB gets with a high percentage of highway miles. I know people who have A/T models and are getting 32-37 MPG. 22 MPG is pitiful!

      If you have to "stand on it" to merge on the highway, the gearing and an underpowered engine are probably more to blame than its aerodynamics.
      • 7 Months Ago
      well im not to much of a fan of ths care because the plain fact is that the things us a cube for christ sake !! I would possibly consider one but the fact that it has to stay at 4000 rpms just to stay a steady 75 in which new yorkers drive everyday i think it would be discomforting and annoying after a while. But nothing can be really said about that because the us version is not out yet and you never know what they are going to change to offer it to the us market
      • 7 Months Ago
      "If I had stayed local, avoiding the highway, the Cube would have clearly done better. "

      You don't know this for a fact at all. What you wrote is pure speculation, nothing more, nothing less.