Read a few car reviews and it's easy to walk away with the impression that we're a jaded lot; only interested in performance, luxury, and price. Any vehicle that doesn't have stupendous amounts of the first two for the tiniest pile of the latter gets kicked to the curb. It's true, driving cars that don't belong to us facilitates a certain view into how the other half lives that could definitely ruin one on lesser vehicles. On the other hand, there's an entirely different type of enjoyment to be extracted from cars that forego ostentation without ratcheting up the crap factor. Toyota's Yaris will never be mistaken for a Lexus, but it's neither the absolute nadir, nor ultimate zenith of autodom, meaning it has a shot.
Photos Copyright ©2008 Dan Roth / Weblogs, Inc.
Click any image to enlarge

We're not exactly sure what to make of the little three door Yaris. It wears Toyota badging, yet the design is deliberately weird enough to wear Scion indicia. Indeed, Toyota's supposedly hipper sub-brand offers the xD, a five-door on the same architecture as the three and four-door Yaris models. You'd think that Toyota could get away with more conservative styling. Once upon a time, Tercels wore lines cribbed from E36 BMWs, while the Yaris team apparently looked toward the Elgin Pelican for inspiration.


The S version tries a little harder visually with Toyota's half-awkward bodykit and a red "S" on the liftgate denoting nothing at all. If the three-door shared the nose of the sedan, it wouldn't be so bad. As it is, Nunez nails it when pointing out the Yaris belongs in the PokeDex. Someone, somewhere, will undoubtedly love the looks, so let's just say that we think the true beauty (if yould call it that) of the Yaris lies inside.
While stubby on the outside, the interior is surprisingly accommodating both front and rear. Six-footers might not be pleased getting stuck in the back seat, but fill the Yaris with a quartet of mid-five-footers and nobody can honestly gripe. All four seats even slide fore/aft. Cargo capacity behind the rear seat is limited for loads of pea stone, but holding the carpool's laptop bags won't be a problem. Hatches are excellent at packing big functionality into small footprints, and when piloted solo, folding the rear seats ups the usefulness tremendously. For the way many folks use their cars, a 3 door Yaris is more than enough.


Attentive interior design is what lends the Yaris a bigger feel inside than its tinytastic dimensions initially suggest. Driver and passenger cupholders cleverly fold out of the dashboard, and the slender center stack with its vertically arrayed HVAC controls stays well clear of kneecaps. There's even storage cubbies on either side of the center stack, as well as two covered bins in the top of the dashboard and a conventional glovebox on the passenger side. Those dual bins are made possible by the centrally located gauge cluster. The merits of such an arrangement have been debated ever since the Echo debuted, and we kept losing our place when trying to glance at the cluster. Given some time with the car, it'd become a non-issue.

The big inside-small outside execution has charm, though the Yaris doesn't lead its class. Honda's Fit, admittedly a little larger, can be crammed with more gear, and the materials Toyota renders the interior of the Yaris with aren't particularly inspiring. On the plus side, there are power windows, locks, and mirrors, air conditioning, and the audio system has an auxiliary input, as well as the de rigeur CD slot, though we did miss cruise control. Less pleasing is the collection of slightly-different plastics, each wearing a separate surface texture and variation on black. Some areas of the dashboard and door panels are quick to pick up unsightly scuffs, and the lids of those dash storage compartments felt vulnerable to being snapped off in a fit of overexuberance. None of this proves detrimental in practice, and perhaps only auto writers addicted to sybaritic luxury will care. The interior is very cleverly thought out, with a lot more space and storage than expected, and on-target ergonomics.


Another invisible area of Yaris beauty can be discovered at the scales. At 2,340 with the four-speed automatic like our car had, the Yaris weighs what small cars used to weigh. That moderate weight means the handling feels nimble and maybe even a little flingable. Ride quality is supple enough that the Yaris once again masks the fact that it's just a little thing. Bumps are absorbed, rather than bouncing the Yaris all over the place. Crosswinds and passing semis likewise leave the Yaris unperturbed. None of this is to say that the Yaris feels sporty, it doesn't, and again, the Fit will whip it. On the plus side, the decent ride and minimal chassis slop won't fatigue in the daily grind, and even deliver mild entertainment.

Hauling the chassis around is Toyota's 1NZ-FE four cylinder. VVT-i variable valve timing allows the 1.5 liter to belt out 106 horsepower and 103 ft-lbs of torque with a husky voice. While the motor is throaty, it's not rough. Even though some of us feel automatics are out of place in small cars, the Yaris is still plenty responsive and has enough snort to handle everything short of leading a police chase. The best part of the Yaris, and possibly the most important given the historic fuel prices we're currently paying, is the mileage. We were surprised and pleased to discover that not only did the 11 gallon tank last a week, but when that week is filled with less than gentle mixed driving, the Yaris will cheerily deliver 36mpg, besting its EPA estimate.
Four dollar per gallon gasoline has fueled a firestorm of interest in smaller, more efficient cars - as evidenced by the latest sales numbers. The Yaris has a low buy-in price, under $12,000, and ours rung the register for a reasonable $17,000, about the same as the more attractive Suzuki SX4 Crossover that also offers AWD and now a navigation system, and is a more willing dance partner. The SX4 can't attain the fuel economy of the Yaris, however. While the Yaris is not designed for extroverted excitement, high mileage is newly sexy, and the design kinkiness will likely attract eyes attached to wallets, too.

Photos Copyright ©2008 Dan Roth / Weblogs, Inc.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 6)
Noah @ Jun 7th 2008 8:21PM
Peppy with the auto? No. Just no. I drove one. Pushed on the accelerator, 3 minutes later I was off! The auto sucks.
Xcountryflyer @ Jun 8th 2008 2:16AM
If I was going to get a subcompact that had 106HP, I would learn to drive a stick and get better performance and MPG. I also think the styling of the 3DR is better than the 4DR. Small tiny sedans look funny with weird trunks. Don't like the center gauges either. I think the car is practical and efficient, I would get the Fit over the Yaris and if I got the Yaris certainly not the S version.
Bob-omb @ Jun 8th 2008 2:57AM
The Yaris (with auto) accelerates faster than the Fit, Accent, Rio, and Aveo. The Versa is the only subcompact that's faster -- and it gets much worse gas mileage.
Nick @ Jun 8th 2008 3:04AM
Bob-omb: "At the track, our Yaris turned in a 0-60 time of 10.8 seconds. A Honda Fit with a manual will do the same in 9.2. The quarter-mile takes 17.8 seconds in the Yaris; the Fit does it in 16.7."
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/FullTests/articleId=109860
psarhjinian @ Jun 8th 2008 8:13AM
Nick,
Those are stick-shift numbers. The Fit with an auto is much, much slower, the Yaris not so much.
Noah @ Jun 8th 2008 9:50AM
Ok, to be fair, it was only one Yaris i drove. But with that autobox, it felt horrible. Then again, it was in for a servicing, maybe it was broken.
Anyways, I drove a few Fits. I was very impressed with the 5spd auto. It was very responsive and quite peppy. I imagine its geared to be more sport than the Yaris, and therefore gets a little worse fuel mileage. But if you must get an auto in a small car, the Fit's 5 spd is hard to beat.
TwinTurbo3000GT @ Jun 8th 2008 11:19AM
even if it did have better performance, that doesn't change how it looks. It looks like a retarded monkey face.
Bob-omb @ Jun 8th 2008 11:24AM
That's the funny thing about the Fit. It definitely FEELS quick with the auto, but it's not. Its 0-60 (and 50-70) numbers are pretty awful. I can understand it because my Civic w/auto feels far faster than the numbers say.
cooperaaaron @ Jun 7th 2008 8:25PM
If some car company made a small, lightweight RWD car as basic as this Yaris, at this price, I would buy one right now. Or, maybe I should look for a used Miata ?
Alex Nunez @ Jun 7th 2008 8:27PM
Hell, for 17 grand, you can find a rather nice used Miata, cooper.
Aprime @ Jun 7th 2008 8:47PM
But the Miata can't seat five.
Duders @ Jun 7th 2008 8:52PM
People who are shopping for a Yaris or Fit require more then a miata has to offer. The miata is an entertaining car but lacks functional space and storage capacity. The Yaris and Fit offer more and hopefully in the near future we will begin to see a return to small light cars like the yaris.
djSyndrome @ Jun 8th 2008 10:37AM
"But the Miata can't seat five."
Neither can the Yaris, unless you're all from Oz.
Also, the Canadians get a five door model; I'm guessing we don't because it would cannibalize sales of the xD.
StickShift @ Jun 8th 2008 10:13PM
The Miata won't get 36 mpg either. I've regularly pulled off mid to high 20s, but not that high. Considering you can pull that mileage AND carry a good deal of stuff and people, small cars such as the Yaris and Fit are quite attractive. This is especially true for someone that can't live day to day in a two seater.
If you can and want to live with a car as small as a Miata, $12000 buys a nice one. Get the hardtop too, as that makes living with a Miata year round livable.
Amusingly enough, the Yaris weighs within a few pounds of my 2000 Miata, gets far better mileage and is safer. Ah how technology advances.
cooperaaaron @ Jun 7th 2008 8:32PM
Ooops ! I forgot the price point I was thinking about, $12,000. Still, I think the used Miata around $12,000 would be my best bet....
Derek @ Jun 8th 2008 2:54AM
That's still like comparing purchasing a 350Z or a minivan at a similar price point. Sure, they both cost the same, but they are worlds apart.
Blake @ Jun 7th 2008 8:35PM
For 17 grand you could get a nicely equipped Versa or Fit. Both are much better looking and have more room and an extra set of doors.
Bungle @ Jun 7th 2008 11:37PM
I agree. I looked at this car long and hard, along with the Fit, before settling on a Versa.
I appreciate the Yaris's fuel economy and bare-bones mentality; I wanted something very cheap and reliable with no extras, other than basic safety features. However, the base model has no A/C (essential in Texas), and that quickly adds a couple thousand to the price, putting it neck & neck with a base model Versa.
The Versa just feels like a much more solid car, uses higher-grade materials (by far), still gets pretty good gas mileage (about 30 mixed), and is all-in-all much better appointed for the money. I paid $13,800 out-the-door. I've had it for a year and it's great.
The Fit is decent, I like the sporty handling and fuel economy, but the interior is very chintzy, and when I was in the market, they were going for such a high premium that you could literally buy a base model Civic for the same price, and get better gas mileage.
The Yaris just doesn't make sense from a price perspective; the $12,000 base strips *everything* out, and just a few basic features will raise the price enough to put it on par with cars that offer better value (including its cousin, the Scion xD). Even in this price bracket, who doesn't offer A/C as standard anymore? Honda, that's who.
Derek @ Jun 8th 2008 2:54AM
It is a sad day indeed when the Versa is being called better looking than another vehicle. I actually thought it looked worse after seeing one in person.
psarhjinian @ Jun 8th 2008 8:25AM
The Versa really isn't a fair competitor in this class. Much like, say, the CTS, it's a bigger car priced to compete with smaller ones. And, like a bigger car, it gets worse mileage and isn't a tossable as it's smaller brethren.
Not that it isn't a smart move by Nissan, but it's not so much "a better car" as a different car entirely.
I chose the Fit over the Yaris because of:
* Versatility. Unless you go for the five-door RS in Canada, the Yaris doesn't even get split-folding rear seats; every level of the Fit comes with the split/fold/tumble seats.
* The Yaris also lacks side airbags; the Fit has six.
* The Fit's five-speed shifts better
I will give that the Yaris does the following better:
* Slightly nicer materials
* More sophisticated powerplant
* Sane transmission ratios. The Fit revvs much to high at highway speed
* More comfortable seats.
If Toyota didn't decontent the Yaris, I probably would have picked it. The European models get traction control and a complete set airbags (including kneebags); we don't. That no-split-seat-in-base-trim is a deal-killer.