VW Rabbit gets a carrot from Consumer Reports
If Consumer Reports is right, Volkswagen is well on its way to attaining its dream of outselling Toyota by 2015. In the magazine's June 2008 issue, CR threw a handful of hatchbacks into the ring and the VW Rabbit hopped out the winner. The magazine cited the Rabbit's "very well finished" interior for its class, agility, braking and transmission as reasons to choose it over a growing field of small hatchbacks. CR also expects the Rabbit to have an "above average" reliability record.
The biggest negative the staff found in the VW was "mediocre" fuel economy for a car its size, though many SUV drivers looking to downsize will love seeing its 24 mpg figure. Staffers also complained about the large C-pillars blocking their view and engine lag after stops.
Consumer Reports has routinely praised the Mazda3 as one of its favorite hatches, but in overall scoring, the car now comes in third, slightly behind the Toyota Prius Touring. Rounding out the top five are the Subaru Impreza Outback Sport and the newly redesigned Toyota Matrix/Pontiac Vibe twins. At the bottom of the list are the Dodge Caliber and the Chevrolet HHR.
[Source: Consumer Reports]
Get a WordPress.com Blog
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
Torrent 1:38PM (5/11/2008)
Well VW is getting back on their feet, so good for them.
Reply
epilonious 9:42AM (5/12/2008)
The easiest way for VW to actually get customers would be to pull a Hyundai: drop a 10-year/100,000-mile warranty on all their cars and put up enough cash to make sure that VWUSA and the dealer network doesn't try to screw people out of money should their newer cars break.
If the new models are reliable... then VW will save money... and if they aren't... they won't piss off legions of former VW lovers by having dealers try and tell them that some chintzy latch breaking or electronic hassles was their fault and they need to pay $700 to fix it.
In the meantime, the rabbit will be a great compact...
... as soon as they actually start shipping the TDI ones.
Red Star 1:39PM (5/11/2008)
Too bad most of VWs in the USA are crap on the longer run (3+ years).
Reply
rmb 6:52PM (5/11/2008)
Yeah, because Fords are so reliable!
pmiddle5 6:56PM (5/11/2008)
Ford's are pretty dang nice you watch your tounge boy. Sorry you like VW's so you have to get personal to someone elses taste. I owned a 1995 VW for 2 years and I dont trust them or expect to for quite sometime. My Ford experiences have been bulletproof which is my dads Mustang, Thunderbird, and Ranger
Red Star 7:29PM (5/11/2008)
Fords are great. I have a Mustang, F-150 and last week I bought Fusion. Couldn't be happier.
Atomicbri 7:45PM (5/11/2008)
My Ford Focus was the biggest piece of, well you know... and I will never buy another Ford again because of it. 8 recalls and numerous non-recall issues, door handles breaking leaving me out of my car, having to enter through the hatch.... fuel pump recalled only to have the dealer not put it back on right, causing a dangerous fuel leak.... yeah Ford's are great. I have a Rabbit now and let me tell you, i have reached the 22K mark and not one issue, none.... So for those saying VWs are unreliable, you have never owned a Ford Focus or as we called it a F*%k^s.... you get the picture.
Red Star 7:49PM (5/11/2008)
Don't worry, once your Rabbit is out of warranty you will be talking the same story about VW too.
rmb 8:03PM (5/11/2008)
the ford focus that my wife had before her Jetta was such a foul car, We had the same 7 or 8 recalls and it was built like a tin can. Our current model Jetta has been trouble-free and built like a vault. I have had 6 VW's total and they have all been very good cars.
There are plenty of other cars out there that have less then stellar reputations, yet people seem to really bash VW's.
Let's be fair you talking about Fords not Toyotas....
Atomicbri 8:55PM (5/11/2008)
Actually Red Star I have owned 3 previous VW's, a Golf, GTi, and a Jetta, and I never had any kind of issues like I had out of the Focus. And the Golf racked up 150K, the Gti 95K, and the Jetta 130K.... nothing major.... just normal oil changes, wear and tear, and maybe 3 recalls on one of the vehicles...which I never had the actual recall issue on any of those. The Ford was unreliable, dealer service was the pits and were very out of touch with Ford it seemed in the performance of their services. Was the worst experience ever. At least when I did have an issue, VW did get me a free rental.... Ford never offered, I had to ask and then I had to pay for one.... luckily it was Enterprise, so they picked me up!
No more Ford's for me.... unless they can prove otherwise...which will take a lot. Besides they canceled the Focus Hatchback for some weird coupe.
Red Star 9:25PM (5/11/2008)
I had 1 Dodge, but rest of my cars were Fords. Escort, Taurus, Mustang, F-150 and Fusion (still own last 3).
I had some issues with Escort, but it was old and it had a lot of miles. Rest of them were great.
My buddy have a Jetta and that car's a crap. So many problems since day one.
Rocketboy 8:17AM (5/12/2008)
I'm sorry to hear that your capacity for happiness is so limited.
Squid 1:30PM (5/12/2008)
Fords are no better...
the friendly grizzly 1:50PM (5/11/2008)
24 mpg? That's frightening. I get almost that in city-suburban driving, and 30 or more on the road with a twin-cam V6.
Reply
Chase 3:46PM (5/11/2008)
First off, it has a 2.5L 170 hp I5. For comparison sake, it would be helpful to know the displacement and power of the motor you're comparing. Second off, its conservative-driving-mode mpg numbers (which I'm guessing you are using to compare with) are 25/31.
why not the LS2LS7? 1:42PM (5/11/2008)
What leads CR to think this will have an "above average" repair record? Simply that it's imported?
The most charitable think I can say is VW is just recovering from a period of poor reliability. Not sure how that leads to this prediction.
24mpg (presumably combined) isn't too bad, if you consider the sportiness. It is odd VW doesn't offer a more fuel efficient version though. All their competitors offer more options on the spectrum between sporty and economical.
I think I'd take any of the other cars listed over the Rabbit. The Impreza is kinda iffy, since it also gets mediocre fuel economy. Imprezas are great if you need AWD, but if you don't, it's just wasted fuel.
Reply
zamafir 1:47PM (5/11/2008)
the more fuel efficient version is the sportier version, the GTI doesn't have any problems hitting around 27 on the combined, though it's no huge improvement.
why not the LS2LS7? 2:02PM (5/11/2008)
Rabbit:
22/29 (manual)
24 combined on regular gas
GTI:
22/29 (automatic)
25 combined on premium gas
Sounds like the GTI has a lot of problems making 27 on the combined. Also, fueleconomy.gov is completely screwed for these cars, it shows 21/29 for the GTI until you click, then it says 22/29.
So the GTI uses perhaps 4% less fuel, but the gas for it costs about 7% more per gallon. Doesn't sound like the economy model to me.
razorasdf 2:55PM (5/11/2008)
I have a chipped GTI and even with aggressive acceleration (man, I love me that boost...) I average a touch over 27mpg combined. If I do almost all highway driving, I get closer to 30-32mpg. The GTI does much better in the real world than the EPA numbers would lead you to believe.
-blank- 3:08PM (5/11/2008)
I've had weird history with the Subie's Legacy's.
One, a manual - 2004, was averaging aroung 27-29 mostly highway. 4cyl model
Second, auto - 2006, averaged 17-19 mostly highway and again 4cyl model.