<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/09/spy-shots-fisker-karma-makes-an-appearance-in-california/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/09/spy-shots-fisker-karma-makes-an-appearance-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/09/spy-shots-fisker-karma-makes-an-appearance-in-california/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought there were two complaints in the lawsuit.<br><br>1. Technology stealing.<br>2. Design of the Tesla sedan was not up to par in looks to a 5 series BMW or a $70k looking car.<br><br>My comment was on 2.  As far as 1 is concerned, I can't see how that can hold weight either.  It's not like electric cars were invented by Tesla.  Fisker could have copied the electric design from a number of others, why would he risk it?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Toy Yoda]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 9th 2008 7:04PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>