Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.













Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
FSM @ May 8th 2008 3:10PM
Now thats a sharp looking sedan.
Torrent @ May 8th 2008 3:29PM
I would like to see the base model though.
psarhjinian @ May 8th 2008 5:03PM
Yes, it is. Now, how about the wagon and/or hatchback?
Ligor @ May 8th 2008 5:05PM
search for 1995 mazda mx6, and you'll see the resemblance on the c-pillar adn rear end.
it's freshened up, but I knew Mazda had that c-pillar somewhere before
it's not a bad design, but how much does that falling roof cut into the rear passenger head room?
$29k + $options for the top of the line means you can get one fully loaded for about $32k - territory that beggs for the G35, 328i, CTS and all three of htese cars are way better than the mazda 6
sorry Mazda but i'll alwyas spend the $2k to get any of hte 3 cars I listed before i even considered a $30k mazda 6, that goes for the Camry, Accord, Altima and all other family appliance cars getting at he $30k mark
Seoultrain @ May 8th 2008 7:29PM
While I agree that the s Grand Touring is expensive, that's the case with any car. The top-of-the-line is seldom for value-conscious people.
And besides, if you move up to the 3-series/G35/CTS, you're going to be giving up a ton of features. Comparably equipped, the price difference will be significant.
geo.stewart @ May 8th 2008 9:47PM
ligor is right, that back window/roof line and the front fenders look awkward and the back roofline looks like it will hurt people, just like the CRV.
definitely better than accord but malibu still has it for me. fusion ext. is better too though int. needs work
too bad chrysler weont play in this arena.