Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.













Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
Johnny @ May 6th 2008 6:11PM
What the scientist say is true and logical. Chrysler knows this as well but they are stuck between a rock and a hard place. It takes years for them to turn around this company and in the meantime they need to move vehicles. I think when this gas card idea got approved at their board meeting a bunch of people in the room lowered their heads but what can they do?
I dont blame them.
In 2014 selling gas guzzlers and giving away 2.99 gas cards would be inexcusable
notYou @ May 6th 2008 10:11PM
In 2014 it would be perfectly fine if you would just let us drill where the (American) domestic oil supplies are. China's drilling 50 miles off Florida's coast, but because of people like you my gas is sourced from Canada, South America, the Middle East, or worse. Thanks.
PJ @ May 6th 2008 10:28PM
I agree. And by the way...
"Damn, scientists are so smart with the math."
"These incentive programs are nothing but promotions designed to grab headlines..."
... so, John, when UCS points out the fallacy inherent to "free gas" programs, it's whining worthy of ridicule, but when you do it, it's hard-hitting news? C'mon.