Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.













Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
tankd0g @ May 5th 2008 10:42AM
Might as well put a stock interior in it with a nice DVD system and big sub woofer box so they can rule the paddock area as well as the track.
Glenn @ May 5th 2008 10:50AM
If you dont punish it for winning and other manufacturers dont want to invest the money to develop a competative car then other manufacturers pull out of the racing series. You end up with a one make race no one cares about with a couple of privateer teams at the back of the pack with no chance of winning.
tankd0g @ May 5th 2008 10:54AM
You mean like DTM? Bring it.
why not the LS2LS7? @ May 5th 2008 11:52AM
DTM is an equalized series.
tankd0g @ May 5th 2008 4:25PM
Ballast has the opposite effect to what is intended in a factory backed series. Instead of lower costs, it increases them as the penalized team spends more money to overcome the increased weight. If forced to carry so much ballast that winning is not a possible regardless of the money thrown at the problem, the team quits. So you have a series who's pace is set by the slowest cars but a budget set by the top teams. Never has going slow cost so much as in DTM.