<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, the more I read about this engine the more I am impressed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LMBVette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 3:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ummmm whats that thingy next to that thingy for? <br><br>LMAO]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brenda]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 3:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[Only 310 hp and 520 ft-lbs from a 'modern' 4.5L turbodiesel?  Not a very good state of tune.  Those numbers are already being exceeded, in terms of scaled displacement, from BMW and Fiat.  They're both pushing 100 hp/liter and a smidge under 150 ft-lbs/liter out of their modern turbodiesels.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 3:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[Rick, are Fiat and BMW installing their 100hp/liter diesels in trucks? <br>Engine tuning for trucks and commercial vehicles is not the same as it is for cars.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zerk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 4:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think this engine is partially based on the 6.6 Duramax so that may partially dictate the displacement/configuration.  I assuming these are fairly conservatively tuned and are capable of higher power output, but what's the point of dropping it in a 1/2 ton truck if you have to put a 3/4 ton running gear under it to handle the torque?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DThiel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 3:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[Always the same stupid remarks.  American car companies almost always leaves something in the engine.  <br>Europeans try to wring everything out of their engines.<br><br>This is not an indication of poor engineering on the domestics part, they're every bit as capable as their european counterparts.  It is an indication of opposing engineering philosophies.<br><br>No amount of sniveling on your part will change that philosophy.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Oak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 4:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, we leave it to the aftermarket to supply the PCM programmers, the propane injection kits, and etc to bump those figures up nicely, and still make it streetable AND reliable.<br>And emissions compliant. :)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Benfolio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 4:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[An engine for a car or crossover SUV needs to be built differently from a truck engine. A truck engine has to be made to handle more abuse and to last longer. This usually requires that they be somewhat detuned.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul P.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 4:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[You think GM is going to put a stressed to the limit engine in thier trucks and SUVs? They will not. This thing is detuned.<br>If it didn't last as long as the rest of the truck (but mabye not the tranny) it would be blasphemous to put it in there in the first place.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Benfolio]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 4:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, go to Caterpillar's site. Their engines have well past 10L displacement and make outputs like 500HP. What does Cat have to say about it? They list "conservatively rated engine" as one of their pluses.<br><br>In these heavy duty applications, it's nicer to know your engine can output what it says at a very high duty cycle (i.e. 24/7) without breaking that it is to get more HP.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 4:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[HP/L arguments = FAIL!<br><br>end of story]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 5:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[How many cams does this have? That's what I want to know.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 5:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[Scaling displacement doesn't work very well due to thermodynamic considerations, among others.  <br><br>Also consider that more power is easily available on most American truck engines simply by turning up the fuel and air delivery.  IIRC, the stock turbo on the 6.6 Duramax will support over 500hp.  Detuning like this improves durability when towing the max payload up a steep grade in the American west.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 6:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'll never get the whole HP/Liter argument.<br>If the engine gets comparable fuel efficiency and performance(or in the case of some engines better), who cares?<br><br>I don't get the appeal of high revving high strung vehicles.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jv2k]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 6:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA['Only 310 hp and 520 ft-lbs from a 'modern' 4.5L turbodiesel?'<br><br>Did you read "The new 4.5L V-8 diesel is expected to deliver MORE than 310 horsepower (231 kW) and 520 lb-ft of torque (705 Nm),"<br><br>GM can't have this engine make 600ft-lbs because it still has to work with the 6L90.<br>Even the CTS-v will only put out something like 550ft-lbs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MikeW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 6th 2008 10:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ill take the Ford 4.4 instead]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RC]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 3:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess when life gives you lemons you make lemonade!  <br><br>We're all proud that you would throw yourself on that grenade so that the rest of us can learn from your mistake.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PayDay...Its_coming_around!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 4:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[sorry bud, but RC has a point. it will be a better engine, and more capable engine from a company that makes better trucks. as one-sided as you may be to the General, there is no support to anything contrary to Ford being the absolute top of the Truck game. Their diesels have always been best-in class for towing and even fuel economy (even though all large truck diesel or gas economy is laughable), but the point remains. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[C.W.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 4:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ C.W.<br><br>Ford makes a great 3/4 ton truck for sure. The engine, however, is average at best and and is one of the areas where it falls behind its competitors. Cummins and Duramax are both great motors but Ford is still wiping egg off of its face from the infamous 6.0L Powerstroke engine. The sooner Ford ditches International the better off they'll be in the long run.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scorch]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 4:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/05/05/gm-releases-details-on-upcoming-4-5l-duramax-turbo-diesel-v8/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have personally owned 7 Powerstrokes, 4 Duramax, and 2 Cummins diesels over the past 14 years...not to mention the 3 VW TDIs and the 2 Mercedes diesels.  I can speak from (my limited) experience that the GM and Dodge trucks had better powertrains but the Fords looked better.  Don't get me wrong, they are all capable of doing more than they will ever need to do.<br><br>As for being a GM fanboy...Bill Ford Jr. signs my paycheck.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PayDay...Its_coming_around!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2008 4:53PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>