
Click the Jetta Sportwagen for a high-res gallery
While we were in Virginia attending the inaugural race of the Jetta TDI cup series, Volkswagen provided us hacks with a some new Jetta Sportwagens with which to make the 45 minute morning and evening commute between the Berry Hill Inn and the race track. Like the last generation Jetta Wagon, the new Sportwagen is branded as a Jetta in North America because Jetta is Volkswagen's top-selling model here. The rest of the world, however, knows this estate-bodied Volkswagen as the Golf Variant. No matter, because the Golf/Rabbit and Jetta share all their important hardware and are, for all intents and purposes, the same car.
In typical fashion, the new Sportwagen has grown since the previous model was retired and is now nearly as big as the last-gen Passat wagon. My first impression upon climbing into the Sportwagen was how it felt nearly as roomy as the 2000 Passat wagon that resides in half of my garage at home. VW provided an assortment of cars with both 5-speed three-pedal and 6-speed two-pedal transmission arrangements. Unfortunately, all were paired with the base 2.5L inline five-cylinder engine. Check out my impressions of the new Jetta Sportwagen after the jump.
Photos Copyright ©2008 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.

As I said, the interior volume of the newest Jetta is comparable to the last Passat even though its wheelbase and overall length are five and four inches shorter, respectively. The previous Passat shared its platform with the Audi A4 of the time, meaning its engine and transmission were mounted longitudinally, taking up more space in the front of the car. The smaller Jetta Sportwagen has the same transverse configuration that Jettas, Rabbits and Golfs have always had. The interior of the car, in typical Volkswagen fashion, is attractive and well laid out. The gauges are large and legible, and the HVAC controls consist of the classic, simple three-round-knobs setup.
The seats, in typical German fashion, are also comfortable and supportive -- if somewhat confusing to adjust. One of the long-time complaints about many German cars that don't have full power adjustment is the wheel you have to twist to adjust the backrest angle. This delivers precise control of the angle, but ergonomically, it's terrible. The Jetta now has a power adjuster for the seatback but manual adjusters for the fore-aft position and the bottom cushion angle. Once you get the seat in position so you can reach the pedals, the steering wheel can be adjusted for both rake and reach. For those who like natural light, the Sportwagen has an available panoramic sunroof replaces almost the entire roof with glass. The front half pops up and slides back over the rear half.
On the road, the Sportwagen is a bit of a dichotomy. The chassis clearly outclasses the standard five-cylinder engine. The suspension is well-articulated and seems to do a decent job of absorbing the road contours, although the worst pavement in rural southern Virginia still outclasses the best in Michigan by a pretty wide margin. Once I get to sample the Jetta on my home turf, I'll give a better evaluation of its ride. Going through the curves, the Sportwagen felt more like a GTI than a Country Squire which is always a good thing.
Even though the Jetta is a few inches smaller than the previous-generation Passat wagon, at 3,250 lbs it manages to come in at about 150 lbs heavier. Most of that is due to increased levels of equipment like additional airbags and nav systems, but improved body structure also plays a part. The five has 20 more horsepower than the 1.8L turbo that resides under the hood of the Passat in my garage. It also has 22 more lb-ft of twisting force available, with a rating of 177 lb-ft. VW quotes a 0-60 time of 8.5 sec for the automatic sedan, which is adequate for almost all driving. The problem is the torque peaks at 4,250 now compared to the 1,750rpm peak of the turbo four. In normal driving, the five-cylinder just doesn't feel very strong. The rather coarse sound of the engine also seems to outweigh the thrust by pretty good margin.
The easy-shifting 5-speed manual box manages to make the most it can out of the available power. The six-speed autobox shifts smoothly but does nothing to enhance performance. The 2.0L TDI diesel that's coming this summer will be paired up with a 6-speed DSG and will certainly be the combination to have in this car. The diesel has 140hp but cranks out 258lb-ft of torque at almost any engine speed. It will also be capable of fuel economy in the 40s and potentially up to 60mpg on the highway. Volkswagen expects the TDI to make up half of all sales of the wagon and 35-40 percent of sedan sales. The first batch of TDIs should be arriving about a month from now and we're waiting patiently for our chance to spend time with a TDI Sportwagen. VW hasn't announced pricing on the Sportwagen yet, but the sedan runs from $17,000 - $23,000. The wagon offers plenty of space for four passengers and their gear -- and five in a pinch. Currently, there aren't a lot of wagons available in this size class in the U.S. market, so if the estate body style appeals to you, this may be one worth checking out, particularly with the diesel engine.

Photos Copyright ©2008 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.
Our travel and lodging for this media event was provided by the manufacturer.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Dausman @ May 4th 2008 1:17PM
Could have a strong interest in a Jette diesel but have reservations about VW quality or lack of quality....there are horror reviews written by owners that make me wonder.....Has VW corrected their aparent severe problems with the Jetta?
Seems other VW models aren't as bad.
MemphisNET @ May 4th 2008 3:13PM
If you're handy, quality could be a moot point. Most problems are relatively easy. Maybe leasing for you would be a good option - then it's all on the dealer.
Boss has a Jetta diesel and he's had no problems over the last few years. Very happy with it.
RedLineTire @ May 4th 2008 3:34PM
You still have to remember that the industry as a whole - including VW - has vastly improved over the past 10 years to the point that the 'worst' new car today still has fewer reported problems than the BEST new car 10 years ago.
Dan @ May 4th 2008 4:17PM
I don't understand the reasoning that quality is a moot point if you lease, or repair it yourself. Being without a running car is still a pain in the ass, stranded is still stranded.
Matroskin @ May 4th 2008 6:04PM
Your information regarding VW Jetta reliability is grossly outdated.
Consumer Reports now rates reliability of VW Jetta with the normally aspirated engine as "average". As a result, this model has been put on the Consumer Reports "Recommended" list.
rmb @ May 4th 2008 6:18PM
We have an early release 2005.5 Jetta, with around 40k on it. This car has been flawless since day one. it's a nice solidly built car. I would recommend it.
why not the LS2LS7? @ May 4th 2008 6:51PM
Fixing it yourself won't make reliability a non-issue any more than a 100,000 mile warranty would. It's annoying to have your car out of commission a lot, whether it costs you any money or not.
I say this as a VAG product owner.
Dick Noble @ May 7th 2008 7:57PM
5/7/08 Re your concern for Jetta's quality or lack thereof. We have owned a '97 Jetta GLS TDI sedan 5-speed stix, then an '03 Jetta GLS TDI sedan Auto, then an '04 Jetta GLS TDI SW Tiptronic and then an '06 Jetta GLS TDI sedan 6-speed auto. We still have the '04 and the '06. The quality of fit and finish ... and all else ... has been tops. We feel that we are owning and driving luxury cars that are a sensible size. All VW owners know that their vehicles are more expensive than average in cost to maintain but, I blame that on VW Germany's training of all their service people around the world. Everyone of them presses too hard on the pencil. I understand that VW of America has just decided to change the frequency of regular oil changes to every 10,000 miles. This is a small improvement. Obviously, enough owners have complained bitterly over the last 55 years. Of all of the 4 cars mentioned above, we still fight to see who gets to drive the '04 SW. The steering and handling in the '04 is far superior to that in the '06. VW ... like Honda ... has gone to electrically assisted steering ... apparnetly to reduce weight. Bad decision. We have an '05 Honda Accord Hybrid too. The steering is terrible ... one cannot relax for a minute. My wife and I fight over who ends up having to drive the Accord. I usually lose this argument. The Accord has gone 14,000 miles. The Jetta SW has gone 49,000 miles. We sat in a new VW Tiguan in New Zealand in February. Great size and quality. I think we will go for one of those when we get ride of the Accord. But, we will definitely wait for the TDI. We put on about 15,000 miles a year on each of our two main vehicle. We love the miserly fuel ecomomy and stellar performance that we get from the TDIs. On the highway, we easily get 50 miles per Imperial gallon. And around town, the economy is great too. I owned my first new VW Beetle in March 1953. I still think they are AMAZING.
SPG @ May 4th 2008 1:17PM
Not really anything but the grill treatment to make this car standout really.
It's attractive enough, yet also forgettable.
I'd take it, as this car would be a good 365 daily driver with room for road trips and would suit my cost of ownership budget.
However, that sunroof makes me actually want this car as opposed to seeing as somthing I'd settle for.
Loving this huge sunroof trend that's been going on for the past few years.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but in North America I think it's Subaru (Forester) and BMW (525 wagon) that started it.
Torrent @ May 4th 2008 1:19PM
Besides price, can anyone tell me why to get this over the Passat Wagon?
Sam Abuelsamid @ May 4th 2008 4:07PM
Diesel. There are no confirmed plans to offer a diesel in the US Passat yet.
mike @ May 4th 2008 1:30PM
VW quotes a 0-60 time of 8.5 sec for the automatic sedan, which is adequate for almost all driving.
"Adequate" is an understatement. It must have been 20 years ago when there was enough "open road" on the east coast to FLOOR a car, to hold the gas peddle down to the floor for a FULL 8.5 seconds. Standard Engines are TOO Big and Too Powerful.
John @ May 4th 2008 2:11PM
Wow. Well I guess it's a good thing that I live in the Southeast then where I can stand on the pedal for 8.5 seconds and be considerably faster than 60 mph.
Joe K. @ May 4th 2008 2:24PM
You're a fool. Acceleration is beneficial for merging, leaving lights and all sorts of things that make for less road congestion. Also when properly used it can be a safety feature, as can nimble handling.
Bad accidents are caused when people do not use enough of their motor to get onto interstates.
I can't tell you how many times I have seen the Prius community or blue-hairs that drive too slowly on the road and cause problems due to it.
psarhjinian @ May 4th 2008 2:36PM
No, he's not a fool. We all (well, most of us) managed to not be killed in the 1980s because of cars with 0-60 times in the low 10s. Heck, in Europe, a huge percentage of the cars on the road can barely crack 12s.
And we're bitching about 8.5? Madness.
With smart shifts on my part, my Fit can do that and it's more than quick enough. I can't even recall the last time I had to floor it in the Saab, and that's a 200hp car. When we have Camrys and Accords that can crack six seconds, something is seriously wrong.
Dan @ May 4th 2008 4:10PM
If that's too big and powerful for you then you're welcome to buy a 1.8 liter clowncar.
Modern engines get their outstanding brochure horsepower and magazine acceleration numbers through smart computer design for better breathing at sky high RPM.
In the real world where people don't drive their boring family cars at 6000rpm, that exorbitant top end power is meaningless. Within the range that actually gets used daily, a "270 hp" Accord engine has no more power - with the VCM killing the midrange, probably less - than the "170 hp" (with 225 ft-lbs at like 3K, and falling flat on its face immediately thereafter) Chevy 3.8 I had 15 years ago.
why not the LS2LS7? @ May 4th 2008 6:53PM
Not only did people manage to survive with 10 sec 0-60 times in the 80s, they even managed to live (and hold down jobs) in northern cities in the winter without having to buy AWD SUVs.
It's astounding what people justify as "must have" nowadays.
Judy Zik @ May 4th 2008 9:42PM
Yes it is hard to imagine but we actually all survived the 70's and 80's when cars weren't quite so quick and families got by without three rows of AWD SUV. I think we are headed back to those times with families actually buying cars instead of living rooms on wheels and fuel economy being high on everyone's list. I look forward to it because most drivers don't seem to understand the handling limits of their big monster vehicles.
Let's face it we all enjoy a vehicle with a powerful engine but I wouldn't call it a safety feature. I can remember merging onto the highway just fine in a little hatchback with about 75 hp. We don't need anything near the hp of a modern car just to merge at legal speeds. We buy them because they are fun.
HeyHuub @ May 5th 2008 7:19AM
The average car on the road overhere prolly does 0-60 in 10-12 seconds. But people don't seem to have any problem merging and overtaking on the highway.
maestromario @ May 4th 2008 1:43PM
I took delivery of mine last monday; Fantastic replacement for my leased 2005 Mazda6 sportwagon. Of course it is a little bit smaler than the 6, but it takes a mesuring tape to know exactly where. I was concerned replacing the Mazda wagon by a smaller less powerful car, but so far it excedes my expectations. Now I just need to get used to the different location of the reverse gear... :-)