Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.













Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
Andrew Tanasescu @ May 1st 2008 9:16PM
Im actually really glad jaguar is posting good numbers, but overall, those are some horrible numbers...
Gargamello @ May 1st 2008 9:37PM
Jaguar is posting good numbers, lol?
With 1700 sales - that's the LOWEST total of any manfacturer included on the list. Volvo sold 4 times as many vehicles and their sale were DOWN 20% for the month.
They sold 300 more cars out of a total of 300,000 vehicles moved - statistically insignificant, much like the brand.
DJ @ May 1st 2008 9:45PM
Actually, SAAB had the least unit volume at 1580, Jag beat them by 15%.
It's interesting how a single new model can drive the increased percentages for the smaller volume companies. The XF for Jag, the Clubman for MINI, and the STi for Subaru.
Smeagle @ May 1st 2008 10:08PM
Gargamello: Still got an issue with Jaguar I see. I thought you said you were going to stop commenting on Autoblog.
Terry @ May 2nd 2008 1:10AM
Gargamello, you're criticizing Jag yet you have a picture of an Alpha next to your name? Do you see the irony in that?
Brandon @ May 2nd 2008 4:13PM
I'm so bitter about Saab. They used to be the coolest cars (well, sorta). Now they're just rebadged Opels and [shudder] GMs, with only a center-bottom ignition to highlight their Saabness.