Contrary to the findings of the Japanese Metropolitan Police, a new study has just been released in Britain which suggests that older drivers are not dangerous on the roads. The Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) data shows that older drivers actually become less of a risk than drivers under the age of thirty. Unfortunately, though, drivers over the age of seventy are more likely to be seriously injured when they do get into an accident. Neil Greig, director of the IAM Motoring Trust suggests that older drivers self-regulate themselves as they realize their abilities are weakening. Still, the U.K. requires drivers over seventy to renew their licenses every three years, but it's up to the driver to report any physical conditions that could impair their driving. The U.K. government is considering adding new testing requirements for drivers over the age of seventy-five.
In other news, ninety-one percent of teen drivers consider themselves safe, though only 34-percent would say the same for their friends. Feel free to scare yourself by reading an entire press release of teen-driving statistics after the break.
[Sources: What Car, Erie Insurance]
Survey reveals teen attitudes about friends' driving habits as well as their own
Despite the fact that auto crashes are the top killer of U.S. teens, a recent survey by Erie Insurance and Lookin' Out, the company's teen driving awareness program, reveals that most teens consider themselves to be good drivers. But while most respondents (91 percent) believe they're driving safely, their other answers told a different story.
The survey, conducted in spring 2008 among 2127 licensed drivers aged 16-19 at 16 Lookin' Out participant schools, revealed a number of risky behaviors.
* Cell phone use among teens is high (76 percent regularly talk on a cell phone while driving).
* Text messaging while driving is common among teens (57 percent sometimes or often read or send text messages while driving).
* Most teens (93 percent) play loud music when they drive.
* Nearly half (48 percent) admit they're easily distracted when friends are passengers.
"These survey results also reveal a real discrepancy between how students perceive their own driving behaviors and how they judge others' habits behind the wheel," said Mark Dombrowski, Public Relations supervisor at Erie Insurance.
While 91 percent consider themselves good drivers, only about a third (34 percent) say their friends are good drivers. And nearly all (97 percent) of the respondents reported seeing other teens taking risks (speeding, not wearing seatbelts, etc.) while driving.
According to the National Safety Council, young drivers aged 15 to 20 are involved in fatal traffic crashes at more than twice the rate as the rest of the population. The Erie Insurance-created Lookin' Out program, which has 72 participating schools for the current school year, is unlike other teen driving programs because it's rooted in positive peer influence.
"Each activity is created by teenagers for their peers," added Dombrowski. "We believe that helping to make teenagers better drivers will make the roads safer for everyone."
Lookin' Out schools create and implement activities to address the risks covered in the survey, such as:
* Seat belt use
* Speeding or reckless behavior
* Limiting the number of passengers in the car
* Alcohol and drug use, and their effects on driving
* Eliminating distractions such as cell phones and loud music
"Teens need to be aware of the dangers and avoid taking unnecessary risks while driving," said John Brinling, Erie Insurance president & CEO. "And it's equally important that they avoid riding with others who are engaging in risky behaviors such as speeding, text-messaging or driving under the influence."













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Spiel @ May 1st 2008 7:39AM
Recklessness vs Awareness
I think I'll stick with the Jap study results.
CarbonBlack @ May 1st 2008 8:06AM
I am with the Japanese.
teens may listen to loud music, but they never drive through gas stations or drive on the wrong side of the highway.
compy386 @ May 1st 2008 8:28AM
Are you serious... You have obviously never seen teens drive. Just because some older people have been caught driving the wrong way and such doesn't mean they're more likely to do it than teenagers. Teenagers are some of the most wreckless drivers. I had friends that drove 70 in a parking lot and knew people that would make left turns right into traffic. Teens are terrible drivers and that's why traffic accidents are the number one cause of teen deaths.
Bah @ May 1st 2008 11:59AM
I don't recall the Japanese study saying that teen drivers are safe, just that elderly are dangerous.
The numbers I recall from the US usually say that teens and the elderly are roughly equal, and that's no compliment for either group!
Benfolio @ May 1st 2008 9:29AM
Tell that to the guy that wrecked those two Porsches last month when he was backing up.
CarbonBlack @ May 1st 2008 3:33PM
compy386, as to your saying teens are Britain's problem,
watch this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKHuHM2cp5k
Were you serious?
tekdemon @ May 1st 2008 8:00PM
CarbonBlack, I'm going to guess you're pretty young yourself, because pretty much nobody who isn't young themselves would ever defend teen drivers.
But seriously? I thought I was a safe driver at 17, at 19, at 21, etc. But you know what? I was an awful driver who did unsafe and reckless crap that everyone else I knew also did. Whether that was going 110 (only once) or not following with proper distance, or just being way too distracted there's no way I was anything even close to a proper and safe driver. I wasn't the worst driver I knew, but I'd have a hard time trusting my younger self to drive me around.
And I'm not even that old-I'm 24 and I'm turning 25 this month...and I think there's a reason why they don't give you that insurance discount until you turn 25. Everyone likes to think they're not the stereotypical young driver, but those insane insurance rates really are there for a reason.
The Doctor @ May 1st 2008 8:08AM
I think I can see how the survey came up with its answer; it's difficult to cause any serious accidents when you're travelling less than 25mph...
Smeagle @ May 1st 2008 11:35PM
Unless you're travelling at 25mph in the fast lane on the freeway.
FThorn @ May 1st 2008 8:08AM
I know my parents at one time drove by 'feel', or must have, since their eyesight was so poor. Going slow enough to feel the road and such means the bumps and crashes won't be that severe. It's a trade-off, really.
;)
Dolemite @ May 1st 2008 8:19AM
Contrary to what most Autoblog readers think, obeying the speed limit is safe driving.
It really should be legal to disembowel any and all a-holes who think that their willingness to speed is an indication of their ability to drive.
compy386 @ May 1st 2008 8:29AM
+1
Bah @ May 1st 2008 11:59AM
Obeying the speed limit is one *part* of safe driving. I see plenty of drivers doing the speed limit that I would rather not share the road with.
I would rate situational awareness and courtosey above speed as long as we are not talking gross speeding.
Pat @ May 1st 2008 9:31AM
It's not safe to do the speed limit if the you're in the left lane of a highway and the flow of traffic is 15 mph over.
As the article speculates, older people become less "reckless" to compensate for their lack of ability. I don't understand how lack of ability is safer. While driving slowly may compensate for your slower reaction times, it doesn't compensate for everyone else's. There are times when you have to make quick and sudden movements to avoid an accident
Dolemite @ May 1st 2008 9:49AM
Pat, I am familiar with that argument. But the problem is that it is a logical fallacy. The argument should not be that the speed limit should conform to traffic, but that the traffic flow should conform to the speed limit! It is not going the speed limit that is unsafe but the act of going 15 over and expecting other to follow along that is unsafe.
The very purpose of having speed limits is so that there is no arbitary speed of "traffic flow" whether it is 15, 20, 25 over the limit. It is exactly this kind of faulty "traffic flow" thinking that results in idiots recreating highway speeds on city streets.
Ligor @ May 1st 2008 10:00AM
yeah, but sometime sthose old people be driving 5mph under the speed limit and that raises road rage and casues other to try and change lanes thereby making an accident which in my book was casued by that old retard that can't drive butit's still allowed to
DKB_SATX @ May 1st 2008 10:45AM
feh. broken comments system. See longer response below.
Dan @ May 1st 2008 11:12AM
No, the purpose of having speed limits is to give the police lawyer-proof justificaiton to pull you over for driving while black, teenaged, or having out of state plates so they can fish for drugs or warrants. And net the city and the insurance industry a couple hundred bucks in the process.
A reasonable speed limit would be followed by a majority of drivers, which would defeat the purpose. Hence the idea we should drive at a crawl on open roads with good visibility.
(And the flipside is you can drive at reckless speed in the rain at night in heavy traffic and not get a speeding citation because you're "under the limit'.)
Bah @ May 1st 2008 12:11PM
Dolemite, there are many cases where the speed limit is set too low. This results in driver inattention due to hours behind the wheel with very little stimulus. Try driving US95 through eastern Oregon. 55mph through a completley desolate area with only a handfull of small towns in the whole trip across the state. The road really necessitates cruise controll to keep the speed down and a good copilot for conversation to keep the driver from nodding off. One of the most difficult 60mph drives I have ever made.
Your response to driving in the left lane is a double edged sword. If you are traveling at a slower speed than the flow of traffic, the safe thing to do is to move right and let the faster traffic pass by. Their speed may or may not be safe, but since you are only responsible for your actions, you should do the safe and responsible thing and not attempt to impede others. hile their actions may cause an accident, your actions only compound that and make an accident more likely.
Pat @ May 1st 2008 2:07PM
Dolemite - I agree, driver's should obey the speed limit. But let's face facts - they don't. Those who do obey the speed limit should be aware of their speed and stay in the appropriate lane. I also believe there should be a minimum speed limit as it should be obvious, doing 35 mph on the highway is probably less safe than doing 70.
I also agree that speed limits should not be arbitrarily set by drivers. But do you know how speed limits were originally set? Back during Eisenhower's term, when they built the major highways, they took people out for a drive and covered the speedometer. When the passengers said they felt uncomfortable at that speed, they used that speed as the basis for the speed limit. Seems pretty arbitrary to me. People are now more comfortable with higher speeds and cars are more capable, but the speed limit is still set at that arbitrary number. There is nothing magical about 55 mpg.
The fact is everyone shares the road. When the flow of traffic is above the speed limit, you can either chose to go with it or fight it. All I'm saying is that fighting it is more dangerous than following it.