<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for GT-R SUV that never was, nor will be</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/28/gt-r-suv-never-was-nor-will-be/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for GT-R SUV that never was, nor will be</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on GT-R SUV that never was, nor will be]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/28/gt-r-suv-never-was-nor-will-be/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/28/gt-r-suv-never-was-nor-will-be/</guid><description><![CDATA[Okay, let me modify my statement with regards to what Beastage said.<br><br>To my eye, that's not significantly uglier than the regular GT-R.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[why not the LS2LS7?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 28th 2008 1:04PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>