<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm glad to see that they are working their way down to the masses.<br><br>That looks like a Garmin 250W or 360W<br><br>Having recently purchased one, I can say that they are pretty useful and interesting to lug around...<br><br>Funny enough, I put mine in my car's on-dash storage bin and my set up looks a lot like that one ... except that I can bring my unit in the house and sync with my Google Maps.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 9:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA[How do you like yours, Pat?<br><br>I'm thinking of buying an inexpensive portable unit, myself. I got my dad a little Magellan (can't remember the model number) that he loves, and it was under $150. <br><br>If any other readers have recommendations, feel free to weigh in. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Nunez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 10:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ alex...<br> <br>I have the cheap Garmin, the big lookin one its like 199 at circuit city.  I bought it 4 years ago and then bought another one.  It's simple and intuitive - i use it for Insurance inspections so I know from experience it will last a good 3 years if u use it literally every day @ 40time/day.  If you don't use it as often as I do i'm sure it'd last a lot longer.  A little tinkering and you can reconfigure the mount and glue it to the dash.  I seriously recommend Garmin, very good quality.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Me]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 1:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA[cameron,<br><br>Have you checked Mini's sales figures recently?  Recent, as in, like the past 3 years?  Good luck trying to buy a new one for less than MSRP.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tarheelsxl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 27th 2008 12:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA[Way to go Suzuki! Stepping up your game... maybe the bigger car manufacturers should take note!<br><br>Navi-System Price Gouging = FAIL.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RCL1221]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 9:50AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA["...propelling the 2009 SX4 to the front of the compact segment as the personal technology leader. "<br><br>Yes, bigger car manufacturers should take note; we wouldn't want to let Suzuki continue to be the personal technology leader.  Every car company should sell a cheap piece of crap with standard navi.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[1337]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 10:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have the Garmin Nuvi 250W.  It's really great ...it's nice to know the surrounding streets when driving around and its especially usefull when you don't have a clue where you're going.<br><br>The 250W is the base unit, it doesn't have Bluetooth and it doesn't have the capability to get traffic reports --features I wouldn't use anyway.<br><br>One cool thing about the Garmin, is that they have a plug-in which allows you to upload locations from Google Maps.<br><br>I've used it to get around cities I didn't know and I've even learned a few shortcuts within my own city with it.<br><br>The only place it messed up was in Toronto on the 401.  It instructed me to take the Collectors instead of the Express (even though I was going clear across the city).  I didn't listen to it and it hard time distinguishing on which side I was.  Once it figured I was in the Express lanes, it kept on recalculating its trip.<br><br>Also, while in Toronto, it kept telling me to keep left ... so I did ... next you know I had to make a mad dash across a few hundred lanes to grab the 410.    I later figured that when it says "keep left" it means, don't exit.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 11:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA[16,000? That's just a lie. Sorry, do you work for Suzuki? There's no need for subcompacts to have any of the extraordinary features found on this vehicle. All wheel drive? You kidding me? That defeats the purpose of a mall vehicle altogether, guy. 24 MPG, no joke. <br><br>Compacts are purchased by people who want cheap, fuel efficient transportation. This car is neither. <br><br>Try $20,000, buddy. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cameron42985]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 10:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am at the Suzuki site right now, and I am astonished at how low the MPG numbers are for such small cars. A Yaris would be a much better option. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 11:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA[Two things. If I'm not mistaken, isn't the SX4's AWD only locks up to 30mph? After that, I think reverts to FWD to increase efficiency. So it's not a full-time AWD system in that it's not always on at any speed.<br><br>Second, the SX4 is considered a C-segment vehicle, not a B-segment subcompact. When you go to Suzuki's website, the direct competitors listed are the Corolla, Civic and Sentra. So the car's no less purposeful than a WRX.<br><br>That said, I'm not sure I'd want a standard Navi, especially if I wouldn't use it that often. I mean it's great to offer something standard others have as an option, but why would I pay for something I don't to use? That money probably could've gone into adding better materials to the interior or something.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Red]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 10:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wtf are you talking about? The models this comes on aren't 4wd, they do start around $16k.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tankd0g]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 10:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA[cameron: at one point things like ABS and air bags were only on luxury automobiles. it is a natural part of automobile manufacturing, or all manufacturing for that matter; create something new, other people copy it, slowly make it a standard feature for everything you manufacture, repeat. as for the 4WD, this is quite likely my next vehicle, and the reason for that is the 4WD. ontario got pounded by snow in february. 4WD would help. the SX4 is the cheapest 4WD vehicle and the standard features list is very impressive. i applaud suzuki for incorporating satnav into the SX4, although i do not agree with making it a standard feature. <br><br>lastly, the SX4 AWD system has three modes.<br><br>FWD - obvious<br>iAWD - intelligent all...  .  sends between 5% and 30% of the power to the back wheels. <br>AWD - sends between 30% and 50% of the power to the back wheels until the speed hits 60 kph and then it reverts to iAWD. <br><br>i would have verified those numbers but i couldn't find anything on their site or the net. i'm pretty sure they are close though.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[feeboo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 10:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA[AWD vehicles are purchased by people who want all weather traction. Fuel mileage does you no good in a ditch. Current SX4s are $14K to $18K. If you paid $20K for one, that's your own fault.<br><br>The next time you think that people only want cheap compact cars, price a Mini.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[flychinook]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 11:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA[Price a Mini? Does that have anything to do with Suzuki other than the fact that they're both compacts? This car is not a novelty. Mini is. And last I checked, they're not exactly flying off dealer lots, either. <br><br>I stand by my statement that Americans who buy compacts typically want them cheap and fuel efficient. Aveo for instance, big seller. This car will not sell. <br><br>I sold Suzukis about a year ago and the AWD SX4s we had ALL stickered above 17k. Needless to say, it wasn't a huge seller. With Nav? I shudder to think. <br><br>And I honestly don't care where Suzuki chooses to slot this thing in the market, but I'm telling you it's VERY similar to Yaris and Fit, not the cars they claim to compete with on-line. Maybe that's just their way of justifying the terrible price. <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cameron42985]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 8:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA[Caneron, you are so out to lunch you may need medication. The SX4 is NOT a Yaris competitor. The SX4 has AWD which those of us in the north appreciate. It gets the very best mileage of any AWD vehicle. It has more equipment standard for the best price of practically any vehicle out there. Load a Yaris up and see what the sticker is. If you want basic subcompact transportation, then buy a two door Accent or Yaris. If you want ESP, AWD, climate control, etc., then the Suzuki is absolutely the cheapest and most economical way to go. And yes, it is a niche vehicle. It is not going to sell in Toyota numbers. But I am glad I can buy something that meets my needs better than the Yaris does.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 28th 2008 10:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA[<br>Our Magellan Maestro 3225 (Costco C$200) has text to voice and works extremely well. Magellan technical support is zero. You're on your own if you have a problem]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gardiner Westbound]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 10:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA[More important than the question of whether you would or wouldn't want an SX4, will having nav standard on more cars lead to at least affordable nav options from other manufacturers, or is it just a blip?  I think the rise of Sync across the board with Ford and the growing number of GPS-equipped cell phones is a sign that this level of technology is becoming ubiquitous and will be as common in cars as CD players are now (and MP3 players soon will be.)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DKB_SATX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 11:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA[Contrary to Cameron above, people don't by compact vehicles just for cheap, fuel efficient transportation.<br><br>The fact is, there is a huge market for premium compact vehicles.  No doubt they should get proportionately better fuel economy and cost somewhat less than their larger counterparts, but assuming people don't want GPS or other niceties is false.  There are plenty of cheap small cars out there, but so few have excellent drive trains, fully independent suspensions, and offer an array of features like moonroofs, stereo upgrades, etc.  The best two examples I can think of are the Civic and the BMW Mini.  All the amenities of larger cars with a tidier size, better economy, and all the amenities of a larger vehicle.  Best thing is, they are offered in 2 door versions instead of the worthless dainty little 4 doors.<br><br>Problem is, too many manufacturers today are still equating small car with cheap car.  Unfortunately, that's why we have an array of stodgy 4 door little cars with lame torsion beam suspensions.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RockStoneSteel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 11:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA["directly respond to SX4 shoppers' unmet needs"...<br><br>Then how about making the SX4 available as a 2 door with doors large enough to allow ingress/egress.  The added benefit is getting the stupid B pillar away from my shoulder and from blocking the side view.  Making these small cars as 4 door vehicles is a bit absurd.  If I want to haul a family or multiple passengers, I won't be buying a car in this size category to begin with.<br><br>The SX4 is an otherwise fantastic little vehicle.  I'd consider it in a heartbeat if it were available as a 2 door vehicle.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RockStoneSteel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 11:33AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/26/2009-suzuki-sx4-getting-nav-system-as-standard-equipment/</guid><description><![CDATA[  Suzuki might be offering the navi system since the next generation  Honda Fit will also come with AWD (optional) and navi so it makes perfect sense for Suzuki to offer this.<br>I don't know of any AWD car that has a sub $ 20K price tage, with a host of options and navi.  Is the MPG perfect?<br>Well any AWD system will require more gas.<br>There is no perfect car and even the suzuki should just be a bit longer, but for the money, it is a good buy.<br>I am starting to see more of them on the road.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dot heads]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 12:06PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>