Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.













Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
Aprime @ Apr 25th 2008 4:18PM
How was the steering and overall non-chassis related dynamics? I haven't had a chance to try it out yet and I'm wondering if there's a real improvement over the outgoing generation in that department. I found the interior to be pleasing and I've gotta agree with you concerning the seats. Only thing I disliked was the door handles (it's one of the reasons I refused going with a base Aveo (sedan, revised), the plastic handles felt flimsy as hell and probably wouldn't be that easy to grab with gloves on in the Winter.
Aprime @ Apr 25th 2008 4:20PM
I mean, I'm pretty sure they're far from being on par with the C1'ers (Mazda 3 and so forth), but as long as it's par with the current Cobalt that suits me.
Chris Shunk @ Apr 25th 2008 5:39PM
I had a last-gen Vibe for 2 weeks when my car was in the shop, and I'd say the steering has more weight, but it didn't really stand out. I actually enjoyed going in a strait line, but it felt tippy when going fast around curves. Seats were great, still don't like the center arm rest, and I can't say the door handles left an impression on me one way or another.
It was a pretty good car overall, but I'd prefer the standard vibe with the best rims I could get... the 2.4 certainly isn't impressive, and the fuel economy was just OK... I got about 24mpg. I would guess the 1.8 is quite a bit better on fuel.
Xcountryflyer @ Apr 25th 2008 5:59PM
If someone is looking to buy a Toyota Snorolla, they should really look at buying the Matrix/Vibe since they are basically the same car. At least the Matrix/Vibe is eminently more practical the the Camry Jr. clone and it doesn't come with a beam rear axle.
I think the Pontiac version is better looking than the Toyota. We need more people driving these types of cars than gas guzzling CUVs and SUVs.
Aprime @ Apr 25th 2008 7:01PM
After seeing the new Matrix in person I'm led to favor it stylingly-speaking over the Vibe, but that doesn't make the Vibe unattractive... Especially financially+equipment+warranty speaking.
PJ @ Apr 26th 2008 1:25AM
Aprime,
I think you'll be disappointed in the steering. It's typical Toyota EPS--pretty good path control, but the wheel feels utterly numb and the obviously artificial weighting manages to be both stiff (when turning) and rubbery (on lock). The prev-gen hydraulic setup was much better.
The GT version's ride is also awfully busy, with heavy-footed "grainy" sensations--this chassis really doesn't want to run low-profile tires or 17" alloys.
The high cowl and beltline make this new generation feel a lot bulkier to drive, not to mention darker inside. It feels more substantial and less tinny than the previous Vibe, but it's definitely a flabbier, less fun hatch to drive.