<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[How was the steering and overall non-chassis related dynamics? I haven't had a chance to try it out yet and I'm wondering if there's a real improvement over the outgoing generation in that department. I found the interior to be pleasing and I've gotta agree with you concerning the seats. Only thing I disliked was the door handles (it's one of the reasons I refused going with a base Aveo (sedan, revised), the plastic handles felt flimsy as hell and probably wouldn't be that easy to grab with gloves on in the Winter.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aprime]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 4:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[I mean, I'm pretty sure they're far from being on par with the C1'ers (Mazda 3 and so forth), but as long as it's par with the current Cobalt that suits me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aprime]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 4:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[I had a last-gen Vibe for 2 weeks when my car was in the shop, and I'd say the steering has more weight, but it didn't really stand out.  I actually enjoyed going in a strait line, but it felt tippy when going fast around curves.  Seats were great, still don't like the center arm rest, and I can't say the door handles left an impression on me one way or another.  <br><br>It was a pretty good car overall, but I'd prefer the standard vibe with the best rims I could get... the 2.4 certainly isn't impressive, and the fuel economy was just OK... I got about 24mpg.  I would guess the 1.8 is quite a bit better on fuel.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 5:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[If someone is looking to buy a Toyota Snorolla, they should really look at buying the Matrix/Vibe since they are basically the same car. At least the Matrix/Vibe is eminently more practical the the Camry Jr. clone and it doesn't come with a beam rear axle.<br><br>I think the Pontiac version is better looking than the Toyota. We need more people driving these types of cars than gas guzzling CUVs and SUVs.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Xcountryflyer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 5:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[After seeing the new Matrix in person I'm led to favor it stylingly-speaking over the Vibe, but that doesn't make the Vibe unattractive... Especially financially+equipment+warranty speaking.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aprime]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 7:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[Aprime, <br><br>I think you'll be disappointed in the steering. It's typical Toyota EPS--pretty good path control, but the wheel feels utterly numb and the obviously artificial weighting manages to be both stiff (when turning) and rubbery (on lock). The prev-gen hydraulic setup was much better.<br><br>The GT version's ride is also awfully busy, with heavy-footed "grainy" sensations--this chassis really doesn't want to run low-profile tires or 17" alloys.<br><br>The high cowl and beltline make this new generation feel a lot bulkier to drive, not to mention darker inside. It feels more substantial and less tinny than the previous Vibe, but it's definitely a flabbier, less fun hatch to drive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 1:25AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[that car is as ugly as a fist full of buttholes]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dea911]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 4:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[This has to be one of the funniest things I've read in a while in regards to how a vehicle looks!  LMAO!!<br>I do like the looks of the Vibe/Matrix myself.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AntBee]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 7:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[Two comments only:<br><br>Our neighbors have a previous-generation Matrix, and the new Vibe (and presumably the new Matrix) seem to have an even higher rear beltline and even smaller side/rear window area. Why does this have to get worse just for the sake of style? Drivers need to be able to see out in any direction at a moment's notice.<br><br>The Vibe is produced (as noted) at the NUMMI factory in Fremont, CA; it's the latest of the Corolla-based, GM-labeled cars built there for more than 20 years. Cars from there last a long time; I still see the occasional mid-1980s "Chevy Nova" as well as its Geo/Chevy Prizm successors many years after they left NUMMI. We have a '99 Prizm 5-speed ourselves and would be surprised if it doesn't last 15-20 years. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gottacook]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 4:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just have to ask...<br><br>Am I the only one that sees a degree of irony in GM choosing to offer a car that's essentially designed and engineered by *Toyota* under the umbrella of a brand that claims (however accurate or inaccurate it may be) to offer "driving excitement"?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 4:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm one of the few people that thinks this car would have been better off in GMC's stable.<br><br>It's trying to be too many things at once, while we all know it's a fuel-efficient utilitarian vehicle.<br><br>But Pontiac isn't excitement now, Pontiac is CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aprime]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 4:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[No excitement?  The G8 says 'hi'.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[djSyndrome]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 5:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[dj: I agree completely about the G8-in fact, if the engine in my 35 year old Buick hadn't just lunched itself I'd probably be looking to buy a GXP sometime next year-though I'm afraid it's the only car in their lineup except the Solstice that qualifies as exciting these days, at least IMO.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 5:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[Aprime was referring to the "Pontiac is CAR" commercials.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Seminole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 5:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[The Vibe has universal appeal.  The G8 has mullet appeal.  The G6, G5 and Wave have rental appeal.<br><br>Like it or not, the Vibe was, for a long time, one of the few GM cars that didn't need cash on the hood to sell.  It's also got great demographics and is well-positioned to win customers as the SUV market crashes.  Oh, and it's a better car than the HHR or Optra, all around.  <br><br>GM's dealers--at least in Canada--would scream blue bloody murder at one of their better-moving products no longer being available.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[psarhjinian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 8:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[@ psarhjinian <br><br>The G8 has mullet appeal?<br><br>Stop breathing my air. You're clearly letting it go to waste.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 26th 2008 12:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[The front end clearly resembles the Pontiac G8.  Nice job.<br><br>Not a bad little vehicle...it would be cool if Pontiac was able to offer a GXP version of this car just like the HHR SS has.  I realize they are obviously two completely different platforms, engine mounting points, trannies, yada, yada, yada...but hopefully you see my point.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LMBVette]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 4:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[+1<br>i like the 'g8' style nose, maybe that will be a new trend for pontiac?<br>i think it looks better than the matrix, but i would also like to see a gxp version.<br><br>but i prob still wouldn't buy one, it's not something i would aspire to, and it doesn't suit my preferences more than my current car.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[havoc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 4:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[Aww, it already looks like it ran in to a wall.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Johnson]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 4:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Pontiac Vibe]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/25/in-the-autoblog-garage-2009-pontiac-vibe/</guid><description><![CDATA[It definitely looks better than it's Japanese twin the Matrix this time around.  <br><br>I've always liked these two little hatches and I think they make excellent, fuel frugal little cars for commuting and hauling.  It's just a shame they aren't more fun to drive.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TriShield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 25th 2008 4:42PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>