Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
New KITT Attack Mode revealed at Comic Con
London 2008: Honda OSM concept roadster says, "Cheerio!"
London 2008: Lotus unveils the Evora
2010 Chevy Camaro - Official Details and Images
2010 Chevy Camaro - LIVE from the reveal
First Drive: Maserati Quattroporte S in Europe
First Drive: 2008 MINI Cooper S JCW
In the Autoblog Garage:2009 Nissan GT-R
North American Exclusive First Drive: Alfa MiTo
First Drive: 2009 Kia Borrego
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadUS federal regulators clear Jag/Land Rover sale
(Page 1 of 1)
Spiel @ Apr 24th 2008 12:27PM
@Sandy
Your argument is somewhat flawed. In your reasoning, why would anyone want to buy an Austin Martin since it's owned by Kuwaiti's. It's not designed or put together in Kuwait, and the same applies to Jaguar. Actually, being owned by Tata is much better than being owned by Ford, since it is less likely for Jaguar to use more Ford parts (down the road that is).
Tata doesn't have parts to plug into a Jaguar, unless they make a Jaguar truck. The only thing Tata has to offer Jaguar/LR is a lot of $$$$.