<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/</guid><description><![CDATA[Both the Challenger and Camaro will cost more than the Mustang, but not substantially more.  Either way there's going to be a load of SE and R/Ts roaming the streets, especially here in the Southwest.  Chrysler has a hit on their hands.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TriShield]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2008 12:43PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>