http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/ Autoblog Comments for Dodge Challenger could start at $23,995 http://www.autoblog.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.autoblog.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/Thank You!]]>Apr 22nd 2008 12:40PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/
]]>Apr 22nd 2008 3:51PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/Apr 22nd 2008 12:43PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/Apr 22nd 2008 12:48PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/
Best value will be the R/T - especially with the power bump in the standard Hemi.]]>Apr 22nd 2008 12:52PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/
I thought this was already out.

When's the refresh due?]]>Apr 22nd 2008 12:53PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/Apr 22nd 2008 1:03PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/
Still on a scale of how much I love these cars the previous gen body was a 10/10 and the current 08 model is about 3/10. It's a good looking car, but I love the older models styling much, much more.]]>May 5th 2008 12:03PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/Apr 22nd 2008 1:55PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/Apr 22nd 2008 2:38PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/
I will say that we have been seeing pics of both cars for about the same time and the STi has been available for a while now. So I thought that the Challenger should be too.

Both, frankly are old news. But the Challenger is older news since it is - in appearance - a copy of what was around when I was a kid. That would make it some 40 years old...and in need of a refresh.

At least for the Subaru - like many "Bangle-esque" designs - it looks much better in 3 dimensions than in 2. And for those of you who are thinking: "But wait until you really see the Challenger." I did, 40 years ago.

Both old news.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.]]>Apr 22nd 2008 3:21PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/Apr 22nd 2008 3:35PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/
With cars there are lookers and there are "goers." You buy a Subaru because they are goers that drive as well as cars costing $10k more. And they spend far less time in the shop to boot. The Legacy sedan is not at all bad to look at though - particularly in Spec. B form.

The SVX was indeed a beautiful car (I had 2 of those).

]]>Apr 22nd 2008 3:45PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/
Good move on their part.

Wil]]>Apr 22nd 2008 12:55PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/>> Twenty-three-nine seems like a digestable price for an entry-level Challenger. And that price may include a slew of features or options that probably warrant the cost.

Since the official price has yet to be announced the bottom line could be on either side of that $23.9K figure. I personally suspect the overall the price will be slightly higher than it's V6-powered Mustang competitor, but not necessarily in the $4,000 range. A base Camaro (when it finally arrives) will most likely fall in this price range as well.

I'm looking forward to seeing the new Dodge cruising the streets soon.
]]>Apr 22nd 2008 12:55PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/Apr 22nd 2008 1:05PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/craptastic 4 speed auto.

How much will the genesis be?]]>Apr 22nd 2008 1:37PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/
mustang will run rings around this 2 door chrysler 300. it will also cost less, and be more practical and efficient.

this thing is all show and no go

i find it funny that some of the same people who laugh the loudest as riced out civics think a v6 4000 lbs retro coupe is cool.]]>Apr 22nd 2008 1:59PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/Apr 22nd 2008 1:00PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/22/dodge-challenger-could-start-at-23-995/
]]>Apr 22nd 2008 1:03PM