Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
Saleen makes new value-oriented Racecraft brand official
Officially Official: 2009 BMW 7 Series
Officially Official: 2009 Ford Focus RS
I want my FPV: Super sedans hit the desert in new TV spot
Happy Independence Day from Autoblog
Track Test: 2008 Roush 427R Trak Pak Mustang
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Porsche Cayman S
First Drive: 2009 Chevrolet Traverse
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Mazda MX-5 Miata Retractable Hard Top
In The Autoblog Garage: BMW 128i Convertible
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
MajorGeek @ Apr 20th 2008 4:21PM
Once again, as a long time Dodge fan and purchaser of a new SRT8 Challenger, the problem is in some of your designs. While some cars like the 300, Challenger and the Ram are some nice designs, the rest of your lot is fugly beyond belief. You have the same look to most of your vehicles like the new breadbox looking minivan now spread to the Dodge Ram. Lots of companies have 2-3 brands with similar vehicles. Its like one day someone got tired of nice looking vehicles and decided to redesign the entire line of vehicles with something not as attractive. Weird. Aside from the Challenger, I dont not even consider Dodge anymore when looking for a car.