• 38
Our cinema-obsessed sister-site got the low down on the next installment of the Fast and Furious franchise, and since the plot and character development (or lack thereof) will be predictable enough, Universal decided to drop the "Four" from the title, so the new flick will simply be known as "Fast and Furious." But wait, there's less. The plot synopsis involves everyone's least-favorite tight-laced trooper, Brian O'Conner (Paul Walker) and the smash-happy Dom Toretto (Vin Diesel) reigniting their feud, but putting bad blood aside to defeat a "shared enemy." The movie will take place in Los Angeles and Mexico, and despite his better angels, the film's director Justin Lin is considering another installment before retiring the series. Fast and Furious is due to hit theaters June 5, 2009. Mark your calendars in anticipation, or avoidance.

[Source: Cinematical]


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 38 Comments
      • 7 Years Ago
      Hell yes! I am so NOT going to see this in the theater.
      • 7 Years Ago
      I absolutely loved the first Fast and the Furious movie - in the same way I loved Hackers. Its a fun time - you just cant take it too seriously. The third movie was pretty good as well. So, Im looking forward to the new one.
        • 7 Years Ago
        I enjoyed the first one, and Hackers is probably one of my favorite movies. Even though now it is horribly outdated, and was completely absurd when it come out, I still enjoyed it.

        Movies like that you just sit back and enjoy. Don't think too hard about it, just watch the shiny objects. :)
      • 7 Years Ago
      That plot sounds... really bad and really lame

      But nobody watches FF for the plot right? It's all about the cars for me
        • 7 Years Ago
        Well put, it's basically car porn. I don't watch it for the storyline.
        • 7 Years Ago
        F&F is as much car porn as TubGirl is regular porn...
        Nobody likes ricers, not even ricers..
      • 7 Years Ago
      Here is a video of some of the cars that will be in the movie... I could recognize an NSX, Soltice, a couple Civics... that's about it. Anyone else?
      http://www.jfxonline.com/jfxonline/2008/02/27/vin/
      • 7 Years Ago
      "But wait, there's less." lol
      • 7 Years Ago
      To be honest, I kind of liked the first one. The plot was relatively good, and even though it was kinda' cheesy throughout, it was entertaining.

      The second one- not so much, and I haven't even bothered watching the third. This fourth one, however, may be worth it. Maybe.
        • 7 Years Ago
        No, because I haven't seen Point Break.

        The first one was pretty damn entertaining no matter how many ricers and Jap-mobiles there were.
        • 7 Years Ago
        You do realize that the first movie was Point Break with cars instead of surfers.
      • 7 Years Ago
      One of my buddies drove by one of the sets in downtown LA. There are at least Skylines in the film and I think he said Challengers. The Mines GTR is at least making an appearance as that car arrived here in LA last weekend.
      • 7 Years Ago
      Straight to DVD this one should go.
        • 7 Years Ago
        dammit, i meant "farce".
        • 7 Years Ago
        The force is weak with this film.
      • 7 Years Ago
      All you haters out there are doing this all wrong. The point of the fast and furious is to stumble into the theater obnoxously drunk, throwing popcorn, and generaly making an A of yourself.

      Dont USE THE BIG BOTTLE PAUL WALKER, YOU MIGHT BLOW AN INTAKE WELD!
      • 7 Years Ago
      exactly, plot is irrelevant here
      • 7 Years Ago
      I like the "putting bad blood aside to battle a shared enemy" concept. Will they be teaming up to battle world hunger? Malaria? Neo-naziism?
        • 7 Years Ago
        That line got me, too. Not because of the "shared enemy" bit, but because of the "bad blood" bit. As I recall, Walker's character gave Diesel's character a car at the end of the first movie to let him escape...and then tells his friend in the second movie that he felt he owed him, blah, blah, blah. What bad blood? Seriously.
        • 7 Years Ago
        The shared enemy is going to be an evil oil-company exec who drives a Twin-Turbo Viper. Only their super fuel-efficient Rice Rockets can stick it to the man in a cross continent endurance race to the death!
        • 7 Years Ago
        Faulty distributors produced in Indonesian sweatshops?
      • 7 Years Ago
      Am I the only one here who saw #3 in theaters?

      el oh el
        • 7 Years Ago
        well, don't you remember being the only one in the theater?
    • Load More Comments