
Click above for high-res gallery of the 2009 Toyota Corolla XRS
The Toyota Corolla hasn't stirred passion since the AE86, so it's forgivable to greet an all-new version with a yawn. The Corolla recipe has been refined to the point of grand success for so long now that changes must be approached carefully. A new version must not upset the car's combination of refinement, value, and durability. To be sure, the 2009 Corolla is likely to continue the model's grade point average full of red circles from Consumer Reports. Objectively, it's tough to top - subjectively, not so much.
Photos Copyright ©2008 Dan Roth / Weblogs, Inc.
click any image to enlarge

New duds certainly help. The Corolla has gone from blobby to "baby Camry," and it's one of the handsomest pieces of sheetmetal in Toyota's U.S. lineup. Like the last-gen Corolla S, the 2009 Corolla XRS gets extra body frippery, and the visual appeal of the Corolla XRS rates high. Toyota is still a little flummoxed when it comes to making the track appropriately wide for the bodykit, but it's harder to catch the 2009 model looking uncomfortable in its skin. The red on our test car didn't hurt matters either, and the XRS gets further niced-out with alloy rims, a black mesh-pattern grille, black headlight housings and foglamps for visual distinction. The trunklid spoiler is the only boil we can find on this car.




On the spec sheet, the Corolla XRS pleads its case convincingly. There's four-wheel disc brakes, a firmed up suspension, a strut tower brace, and most importantly for the sporty overtures, a bigger engine. The Corolla XRS uses Toyota's 158-horsepower 2.4-liter four cylinder in place of the 1.8-liter, 132-horsepower standard unit. Nearly 500cc of extra displacement chews the fuel economy numbers down to 22/30, each off by 5 mpg from the 1.8L without delivering a gee-whiz increase in performance. The torque is welcome, but we'd trade it in a second for better control feel and a more supple ride.

The leather-wrapped wheel and shift knob bode well, but only the shifter offers some mechanical feel. Steering feel is largely absent, though the weighting is good and action linear from the electrically boosted rack and pinion. The clutch friction point is equally smothered, making smooth driving a deliberate practice. Drive by wire strikes again, too, making strange things happen on the tachometer upon clutch engagement. At least the chassis can keep up when you get frisky, though it's only feigning interest and the ride can be a jigglefest on some surfaces. The Corolla XRS is not a pocket rocket in the vein of the Civic Si or Mazda3.


If it's not a star athlete, what exactly is the Corolla XRS? A handsome, well-trimmed, economical car. All the safety gear is there; airbags left, right, center, and curtain. Seatbelt pretensioners, active head restraints, and stability control. Leather upholstery is available on the decently bolstered seats, though we tried the cloth. It would be stretching to call the chairs sporty, and the lack of lumbar adjustment and a hard bar across the coccyx left us wishing they'd used some of that motor money for better seating, too.

Power windows and locks along with remote entry are part of the power package that eases everyday use. Also upping the liveability quotient is an upgraded audio system with JBL speakers, a six-disc in-dash CD changer, aux jack, and XM. Only you can decide if the spiffy radio is worth another grand, but it is one of the few audio systems we've ever tried that can make satellite radio's miserable quality listenable.
Toyota's typical obsessiveness results in a driving environment with intuitive ergonomics, and the materials and assembly quality are good. It's not a Lexus, and everyone, even domestics, have stepped up their interiors lately, but the Corolla has a clean design that's executed well. The back seat is fairly accommodating - the Corolla's not the subcompact it once was - and a flat floor across the rear enhances the spacious vibe. The usefully large trunk capacity can be expanded by folding down the rear seatbacks, and elsewhere inside are two gloveboxes, large door cubbies, and an also-capacious storage bin in the center armrest. As a car for the everyman, the Corolla hits all the right notes. For the apex-carver who delights in a little cut and thrust, which is the type of customer the plumage will interest, the XRS will come off as nervous when you request it live up to its image.

The price, too, is less than palatable. The XRS starts above $20,000, and ours was optioned up to $22,000 - a little hard to stomach for a Corolla. That kind of dough will buy a comparably equipped Civic EX-L, while a Spec-V Sentra SE-R brings 200 horsepower to the party for a couple grand less, and the Ford Fusion delivers more space in its nicer interior, virtually the same mileage, and reliability ratings that better the CamCord while riding a far more ebullient chassis than the Corolla XRS.

We're hardly saying the Corolla XRS is a poor choice - it's sharp looking, well built, and capable. Our main beef lies with the speedy-looking bodywork writing checks that the car's dynamics can't cash, which is a bit of a letdown if you allow your eyes to set expectations. A quick four-word summation: "Looks great, less filling."
Photos Copyright ©2008 Dan Roth / Weblogs, Inc.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
Xcountryflyer @ Apr 16th 2008 1:12PM
It is still very utilitarian transportation wrapped up in a bit of superficial flash. It reminds me of the "S" model Corollas. Some lame bodywork with the same engine and suspension. I'm not sure if a lot of people are going to buy this XRS Corolla, since Corolla buyers are not a sporty bunch. For a loaded model XRS, you could just stretch and get a Mazdaspeed3 that will blow this XRS out of the water! If I was going to get an "XRS" Toyota, I'd just buy the Matrix and get the practicality and a 4-wheel independent suspension and not the beam axle in all Corollas.
KA @ Apr 17th 2008 1:51AM
I agree with the gist of what you're saying -- if you're looking for performance, there are better options.
But, it is a different engine. RTFA:
"The Corolla XRS uses Toyota's 158-horsepower 2.4-liter four cylinder in place of the 1.8-liter, 132-horsepower standard unit"
Torrent @ Apr 17th 2008 2:25PM
Yeah, or you could get (although not in the same class) a Dodge Caliber SRT4 for around the same price range as the XRS.
David Thompson @ Apr 16th 2008 1:12PM
What? No love for the AE92 Corolla GT-S?
hashiryu @ Apr 16th 2008 1:54PM
Same thing I was asking myself.
The supercharged corolla fx16?
What about the AE101 & AE111 Levin GT-Z & BZ-R ? ..oh wait, those didn't go to the US, did they? **snicker**
SPG @ Apr 16th 2008 1:15PM
I'm a little suprised by this writeup.
Pricey, could be roomier, heavy, could have more power.
It looks like the XRS is not the good choice I assumed it to be.
Alex @ Apr 16th 2008 2:24PM
read consumer reports ;)
John Johnson @ Apr 16th 2008 1:17PM
In other news, Toyota designers watched as a Scion tC, Toyota Camry, and Subaru Impreza got into a horrible accident.
tC Owner @ Apr 16th 2008 8:55PM
I couldn't help...I had to reply to you with a kudos...that was awesome!!
Endurancevm @ Apr 16th 2008 1:20PM
Civic SI is a 3000000x better choice than this pile of garbage, for the same amount of money. What is the point of the Corolla? Its slow, ugly(i think it is, beauty is in the eye of the beholder), handles on par with a 3-legged donkey with tourettes, and most importantly: its a COROLLA!@#?!@#111111 I for one, would never, ever, ever buy any Corolla.
David @ Apr 28th 2008 12:33AM
Have you even driven the car, I doubt it since it has only been out for a couple of months. I drove the Civic Si after the XRS and the XRS Handled so mych better, and accelerated so much better I couldn't buy the Honda. Plus, the gas mileage is better, even if only a couple miles per gallon. Better efficiency, better looks, better handling, more room. I'll take the XRS. Plus, there is little bias, since I've never owned a Toyota in my life.
Andrew @ Apr 16th 2008 1:23PM
In other words, exactly like the last Corolla S. Yawn.
Mehul @ Apr 16th 2008 4:02PM
Somehow the word "Corolla" and "Sport" does not go together.
I always laugh when I see a "hooked up" Corolla.
djSyndrome @ Apr 16th 2008 1:30PM
Toyota should have saved the XRS badge for a car that could get out of its own way. Any 05-06 Corolla XRS would run rings around this thing.
psarhjinian @ Apr 16th 2008 1:43PM
Keep in mind, I really liked the Celica GT-S and Corolla XRS.
Well, yes and no. The old XRS was quick and fun to drive (in that special "shift-like-mad" sense of the word) for it's class, but people were constantly harping on the lack of torque from the 1.8L VVTLi. Toyota remedies this with the 2.4L in the current XRS, and now people complain about it being not extreme enough. They just can't win with you guys, can they?
I agree that this car ought to be hotter, but short of stuffing the 3.5L V6 (which would be awesome, BTW) Toyota has nothing else in it's North American stable (unlike Honda or GM). This car is quick enough and sporty enough for 90% of the population; the other 10% wouldn't walk into a Toyota showroom even if they did have a hotter model.
Seriously. Even if this car had an AWD version of the IS350's powertrain, I really doubt that performance buyers would consider it. It's a Corolla, with all the demographic baggage that entails.
Toyota sells a lot of Corollas. I think that, regardless of what enthusiasts think, they'll continue to do so by making exactly the cars that most people want to buy, not the kind of cars that the gearheard population wants to buy.
djSyndrome @ Apr 16th 2008 2:14PM
I have an '03 Matrix XRS, so I fully understand about the lack of torque from the 2ZZ. Driving with the family and a full hatchback is an exercise in frustration at every stoplight, but the mornings where I take the thinly-populated back roads to work more than make up for it. It's no Mazda 3, but it has way more room and the sound scares the bejezus out of onlookers at 8,000 rpm ;)
Toyota's 2.4L isn't a great engine, and you're right - there's not much else they could have thrown in there without either borrowing from Subaru (which wouldn't fit anyway) or going back to the drawing board. But my comment was more about the complete package: no more high-rpm performance engine, no more six-speed manual, heavier, unnecessary giant tires, etc. The whole thing just seems to be a case of bigger for bigger's sake, not well thought out engineering.
Here's hoping the upcoming RWD coupe brings some performance back to Toyota. It's been missing for far too long.
jgp @ Apr 16th 2008 3:17PM
Thing is, the _base model_ compacts from every other manufacturer are about as powerful as the XRS. Nearly everyone is in the 150s now, or at least the upper 140s. Yet the base Corolla is in the low 130s, and the XRS is in the 150s.
_This_ is why the XRS isn't competitive. The 2.4 needs to be standard in the base Corolla, and the XRS needs a more powerful engine at around 200hp, to be competitive with the Civic Si and VW GTI.
Disgruntled Goat @ Apr 16th 2008 5:28PM
"Thing is, the _base model_ compacts from every other manufacturer are about as powerful as the XRS."
You see, the thing is, almost nobody in the real world cares. You're blinded by the $$$=HP equation where to others it may be $$$=Reliability, or $$$=Refinement, or whatever. 90% of car buyers just want something that's cheap, gets good mileage, is reliable, is stylish and doesn't drive like a toy. That's why the Corolla is the best selling nameplate in the world. Not Mazda3, not Cobalt and not Civic.
David Thompson @ Apr 16th 2008 11:31PM
"Seriously. Even if this car had an AWD version of the IS350's powertrain, I really doubt that performance buyers would consider it."
That would be the JDM Corolla Blade Master G. Build a few hundred of those to US-legal spec and that just might get the Corolla some respect here.
Joe @ Apr 16th 2008 1:31PM
5 mins. of my life I won't get back...
Toyota's fault, not the ed. staff...
I was pleasantly suprised to read something negative about a Toyota though...
It felt good writing that, didn't it ;)