Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
New KITT Attack Mode revealed at Comic Con
London 2008: Honda OSM concept roadster says, "Cheerio!"
London 2008: Lotus unveils the Evora
2010 Chevy Camaro - Official Details and Images
2010 Chevy Camaro - LIVE from the reveal
First Drive: Maserati Quattroporte S in Europe
First Drive: 2008 MINI Cooper S JCW
In the Autoblog Garage:2009 Nissan GT-R
North American Exclusive First Drive: Alfa MiTo
First Drive: 2009 Kia Borrego
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
iQuack @ Apr 16th 2008 8:43PM
Anything GM does to consolidate dealers so fewer of them sell more car lines will make it easier to drop redundant vehicles.
GM still has too many brands and too many models per brand. This is unnecessarily costly both in manufacturing and marketing.
Does the world really need a Saturn Aura, Chevy Malibu, and Pontiac G6? Do truck buyers really need both Chevy and GMC variations of the same vehicles?
GM needs to be ruthless in simplifying its car lines IMO. And Saab doesn't need to be killed because it's been dead for years, so GM should finally bury the corpse.